Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vijith A.N vs The General Manager
2021 Latest Caselaw 14329 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14329 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021

Kerala High Court
Vijith A.N vs The General Manager on 8 July, 2021
OP (CAT) No.34/2021                          1/4

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                         PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                            &
                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
                  Thursday, the 8th day of July 2021 / 17th Ashadha, 1943

                                 OP (CAT) NO. 34 OF 2021


(AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.06.2021 IN OA 180/223/2021 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE
                      TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH, ERNAKULAM)




   PETITIONER/APPLICANT IN THE O.A:

           VIJITH A.N, S/O. GOVINDAN,AGED 38 YEARS, STAFF NO. J/T 5015, PF NO.
           15551201240., NOW WORKING AS STATION MASTER, KANNAPURAM, SOUTHERN
           RAILWAY, PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT NIDUVOTE HOUSE, P.O. MAVILAYI,
           KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670622. MOB. 9744317090.

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

       1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAYS, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI, PIN 600
          002.
       2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, DRM OFFICE COMPLEX, SOUTHERN
          RAILWAY, PALAKKAD DIVISION, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 002
       3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL OPERATING MANAGER, DRM OFFICE COMPLEX,
          SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PALAKKAD DIVISION, OLAVAKKOD, PALAKKAD, PIN-678
          002
       4. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONAL OFFICER, DRM OFFICE COMPLEX, SOUTHERN
          RAILWAY, PALAKKAD DIVISION, OLAVAKKOD, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 002
       5. STATION SUPERINTENDENT, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, KANNAPURAM KANNUR-670 301


        OP(CAT) praying inter alia that in the circumstances stated in the
   affidavit filed along with the OP (CAT) the High Court be pleased to stay
   the operation and implementation of Annexure A18,A20 and A21 in O.A
   180/223/2021 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal(Ext.P1)
   pending disposal of the above Original Petition.




        This petition coming on for admission on 08.07.2021 upon perusing
   the petition and the affidavit filed in support of OP (CAT) and upon
   hearing the arguments of M/S.K.MOHANAKANNAN, BYJU RAGHAVAN E. Advocates
   for the petitioner and of Sri.B.RAJESH, SC,RAILWAYS, for the
   respondents,the court passed the following.
 OP (CAT) No.34/2021                  2/4

                       APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 34/2021
Annexure A18          TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO. 00/NO. J/T-20/2021
                      DATED 22.4.2021.
Annexure A20          TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO.
                      J/T-20/SNP/VAN DATED 5.5.2021.
Annexure A21          TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO.
                      J/T-20/SNP/VAN DATED 17.5.2021, ISSUED BY THE 4TH
                      RESPONDENT.
Annexure A7           TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE NOTE NO.J/P 11/CON/SPL SUPY
                      POSTS/VOL V DATED 7.9.2020 ISSUED BY THE 4TH
                      RESPONDENT.
Annexure A9           TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. J/T-15/2020 DATED 8.9.2020
                      ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
Annexure A12          TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. J/T20/KPQ/VAN/1 DATED
                      7.10.2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Annexure A15          TRUE COPY OF THE RELIEVING ORDER NO. SS/KPQ/DATED
                      8.10.2020 AFFIXED IN THE NOTICE BOARD OF KANNAPURAM
                      STATION.
Annexure A17          TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OA 180/00511/2021 DATED
                      23.3.2021.
EXHIBIT P1:           TRUE COPY OF THE O.A 180/223/2021 OF THE HON'BLE
                      TRIBUNAL WITH ANNEXURES.
 OP (CAT) No.34/2021                             3/4




                  ALEXANDER THOMAS & A.BADHARUDEEN , J J.
                       ------------------------------------------------
                               OP(CAT) No.34 of 2021
                (Arising out of order dated 03-06-2021 in O.A (CAT) No.180/223/2021
                                        on the file of CAT, Ekm.)
                         ----------------------------------------------------
                            Dated this the 8th day of July, 2021

                                            ORDER

Sri.B.Rajesh, the learned Standing counsel for the Railways

seeks short time to get instructions from the respondents. Time granted.

In that regard the competent authority of the official respondents will

hold specific instructions to the learned Standing counsel for the

Railways as to the reasons for not complying with the directions issued by

the CAT, Ernakulam Bench, as per Annexure A17 dated 23-3-2021 in O.A

No. 511 of 2020, more particularly as to why there is inordinate delay in

compliance with that verdict, though the time limit of one month

stipulated therein has elapsed long ago. By Annexure A17 final order, the

Tribunal has quashed the impugned proceedings therein, whereby the

petitioner was earlier ordered to be appointed and deployed as Section

Controller in Palakkad, as it was found that the said post involves

discharge of arduous and heavy duties and that in view of the medical

decategorization of the petitioner due to his serious heart ailments, such

posting in a safety category job is not legally permissible. Over and above OP (CAT) No.34/2021 4/4

OP(KAT) No.156 of 2021

that the Tribunal by Annexure A17 has also quashed the impugned

proceedings therein at Annexures A7, A9, A12 and A15 therein.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the respondents shall take immediate

steps to ensure that the directions of the Tribunal in Annexure A17 are

complied with as expeditiously as possible and in the said process, the

petitioner shall not be posted to any post involving arduous and heavy

responsibilities in a safety job and he should be accommodated in a

non safety job taking into consideration his serious heart ailments.

2. It is also made clear that the delay on the part of the

respondents in complying with the verdict of the Tribunal in

Annexure 17, cannot be a basis to take any action detrimental to the

applicant, as the respondents cannot take advantage of their own

wrong in not complying with the verdict of the Tribunal.

List the case on 21-07-2021.

H/o to both sides.

                                        ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE




                                       A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE

        amk




08-07-2021                        /True Copy/                           Assistant Registrar
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter