Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arif Sulthan vs Trident Hotel
2021 Latest Caselaw 14300 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14300 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021

Kerala High Court
Arif Sulthan vs Trident Hotel on 8 July, 2021
RSA No.199/2021                         1/5




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                    PRESENT
                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
            Thursday, the 8th day of July 2021 / 17th Ashadha, 1943
                      IA.NO.4/2021 IN RSA NO. 199 OF 2021

                        AS 58/2018 OF SUB COURT,KOCHI.

             OS.NO.385/2016 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT,KOCHI.

   PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
          ARIF SULTHAN, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.LATE MOHAMMED SULTHAN DAR,
          CRAFTERS AND ANTIQUE SHOP, BRISTOW ROAD, WILLINGTON ISLAND,
          KOCHI-682 003.
   RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
          TRIDENT HOTEL, BRISTOW ROAD, WILLINGTON ISLAND, KOCHI-682
          003, REPRESENTED BY ITS OWNER VIKRAM OBRAY.
        Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
   affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to grant 3
   months time to remove the articles belonging to the appellant
   from the Plaint Schedule Shop room.
        This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the
   application and the affidavit filed in support thereof,and this
   court's judgment dated 30.03.2021 and upon hearing the arguments
   of SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN, Advocate for the petitioner, the court
   passed the following:
 RSA No.199/2021                              2/5




                                N. ANIL KUMAR, J.
                        -------------------------------------------
                                    I.A.No.4/2021
                                            in
                               R.S.A.No.199 of 2021
                       ---------------------------------------------
                       Dated this the 8th day of July, 2021

                                         ORDER

This is an application seeking to grant three months

time to remove the articles belonging to the appellant

from the plaint schedule shop room.

2. In the case on hand, the RSA was dismissed in

limine by this Court on 30.03.2021. However,

considering the submission made by the learned counsel

for the appellant, the appellant was given one year's time

to vacate the premises on his undertaking to file an

affidavit before the executing court agreeing to

surrender the scheduled room on expiry of one year

from the date of that judgment i.e. from 30.03.2021 and

also to pay the licence fee as agreed between the parties

as on date within a period of one month from the date of

that judgment and continue to pay the licence fee till the RSA No.199/2021 3/5

I.A.No.4/2021 in RSA No. 199 of 2021 ..2..

,

date of surrender. It was further clarified that, in case of

failure to comply with the directions as stated herein

above, it is within the realm of the execution court to

execute the decree, in accordance with law.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/

appellant.

4. The petitioner who is the appellant in the above

appeal filed this application stating that currently he is in

Jammu and Kashmir and he is not in a position to come

over to Kerala due to Covid-19 situation prevailing in the

State. He would say that he has decided to remove all his

articles from the plaint schedule shop room within three

months. In order to facilitate such removal of articles

from the plaint schedule shop room, he seeks three

months time as a special case.

5. On going through the affidavit, it is clear that

the petitioner/appellant has not deposited the licence fee RSA No.199/2021 4/5

I.A.No.4/2021 in RSA No. 199 of 2021 ..3..

,

as agreed between the parties as on date within one

month from the date of the judgment and continued to

pay the licence fee as ordered by this court as per

judgment dated 30.03.2021. He also failed to file an

affidavit before the Executing Court in terms of the above

judgment as ordered by this Court. The petitioner who

has not remitted any amounts towards the arrears of

licence fee is asking for further relief taking advantage of

Covid-19 situation prevailing in the State. Even if the

petitioner is not in station, the payment of money towards

licence fee can be made by bank transfer. There is no

justification on his part in not paying the licence fee

though this Court was liberal in granting one year time

for him to surrender. A party, who has stoutly disobeyed

the order of this Court, is not entitled to get three months

time more as claimed by him. The application is liable to

be dismissed.

 RSA No.199/2021                                    5/5




          I.A.No.4/2021
               in
          RSA No. 199 of 2021
                                                ..4..
                                                  ,


                  In   the   result,   the      interlocutory   application   is

dismissed. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of

this order to the executing court forthwith.

Sd/-

N. ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE

kkj

08-07-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter