Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajalekshmi vs The State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 13922 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13922 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2021

Kerala High Court
Rajalekshmi vs The State Of Kerala on 6 July, 2021
WP(C) NO. 25854 OF 2020            1

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
     TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1943
                         WP(C) NO. 25854 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:

             RAJALEKSHMI
             AGED 61 YEARS
             D/O.PONNAMMA, GEETHA BHAVAN, NANTHENCODE,
             NOW RESIDING AT KNRA-15A, GOLF LINKS ROAD, KOWDIAR,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003.

             BY ADV J.HARIKUMAR



RESPONDENT/S:

     1       THE STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
             GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
             PIN CODE-695001.

     2       DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
             COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN CODE-695043.

     3       THE SECRETARY,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TRIDA),
             JAYA MANSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O.,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010.

             BY ADV SRI.K.A.JALEEL



             SMT A.C VIDHYA, GP




      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   06.07.2021,   THE    COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 25854 OF 2020                 2

                                   JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a senior citizen. From Ext.P4 certificate it is evident that

she is undergoing treatment at the Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences for

'Carcinoma Breast' since 2009. The petitioner has approached this Court

being aggrieved by the recalcitrant attitude of the respondents in releasing the

amount awarded consequent to the award passed in Land Acquisition

proceedings.

2. The petitioner states that she is the claimant in

L.A.R.No.465/2009 on the file of the IInd Additional Sub Court,

Thiruvananthapuram. By award dated 31.07.2013 a sum of Rs.10,42,000/-

with 12% interest on the said sum for the period from 26.06.2006 to

14.11.2007 with 30% solatium on the enhanced compensation and 9%

interest per annum for a period of one year on the enhanced amount from

20.11.2007 and thereafter interest at the rate of 15% per annum till

realisation of the enhanced amount with proportionate cost was awarded to

her. The judgment has become final.

3. Seeking realisation of the amount E.P.No.228/15 was filed by the

petitioner before the Execution Court. As is evident from Ext.P2, the

Execution Petition was filed as early as on 31.03.2015. The petitioner would

refer to Ext.P3 case proceedings and would contend that from 2015 onwards

till date, the matter is being adjourned for one reason or the other. Not even a

single paise has been paid to the petitioner. It is in the above backdrop that

the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the

respondents 1 and 2 to make payment of the amount in satisfaction of Exhibit

P1 decree within a time frame.

4. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that now

that the petitioner has filed an application for execution, it is for the petitioner

to realise the amount by recourse to execution proceedings.

5. I have considered the submissions advanced. I find that the

award was passed in favour of the petitioner as early as on 31.07.2013. From

2015 onwards the petitioner has been knocking the doors of the execution

court to secure the fruits of the judgment. Ext.P4 medical certificate would

show that she is suffering from serious ailments. There is no justification on

the part of the respondent in exercising their powers of eminent domain and

thereafter refusing to pay the compensation due to the persons who have

been deprived of their valuable property. More than 6 years have elapsed after

filing the execution petition. I am of the considered opinion that this is a fit

case wherein directions can be issued to the respondents to deposit the

amount covered under the award together with the benefits and interest

within a time frame.

Resultantly, this writ petition will stand allowed and there will be a

direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to make payment of the entire amount

due to the petitioner in satisfaction of Ext.P1 decree together with interests

and solatium as ordered, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a

period of 45 days from today.

This writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE IAP

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25854/2020

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 31.7.2013 IN LAR NO.465 OF 2009 OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION NO.228 OF 2015 IN LAR NO.142 OF 2010 BEFORE THE SECOND ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF THE CASE DETAILS OF EXECUTION PETITION NO.228 OF 2015 IN LAR NO.142 OF 2010 BEFORE THE SECOND ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 11.11.2020.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.16901 OF 2013 DATED 25.9.2013.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.6911 OF 2019 DATED 21.3.2019.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter