Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2777 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 5TH MAGHA, 1942
WP(C).No.7226 OF 2011(C)
PETITIONER:
SHAJINA C
II GRADE ASSISTANT,
PAYYANNUR KHADI CENTRE,
PAYYANNUR, KANNUR-670 307.
BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2 DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3 THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER
KANNUR-670 001.
4 KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES
BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, KERALA KHADI AND
VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
5 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
6 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISHSCKERALA KHADI BOARD
R1 BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS, SC, KERALA KHADI AMP
VILLAGE INDUSTRIES B
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.SHARAFUDHEEN, SC, KERALA KHADI AND
VILLAGE INDUSTRIES
R4 BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS, SC KERALA KHADI &
VILLAGE INDUSTRIES B
WP(C).No.7226 OF 2011 2
SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE (GP), SRI.TOM K.
THOMAS(SC), SRI. SHARAFUDHEEN(SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
25.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.7226 OF 2011 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner effectively seeks an inter-
departmental transfer in the services of the
Kerala Khadi and Village Industries Board.
2. However, Government has taken a stand
in their counter pleadings that the afore said
Board is not a Government Department and
therefore, that the transfer sought for by the
petitioner cannot be acceded to.
3. In any event of the matter, I notice
that this writ petition has been pending
before this Court for the last more than 9
years without any orders being issued in
favour of the petitioner. I am, therefore, of
the view that no further reliefs can be
granted to him based on the averments in the
writ petition, on account of efflux of time.
In the afore circumstances, I close this
writ petition, but leaving liberty to the
petitioner to seek any relief that he may
require against the respondents through a
fresh writ petition; for which purpose, all
contentions in this case are left open.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
MC/30.1.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!