Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Manager vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 2508 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2508 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
The Manager vs State Of Kerala on 21 January, 2021
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                       PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

           THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 1ST MAGHA, 1942

                           WP(C).No.25419 OF 2013(B)


PETITIONERS:

       1         THE MANAGER
                 S.M.V HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, POONJAR, KOTTAYAM - 686 581.

       2         ROY JOSEPH SON OF JOSEPH MATHEW
                 AGED 40 YEARS
                 HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (JUNIOR), S.M.V. HIGHER
                 SECONDARY SCHOOL, POONJAR, KOTTAYAM - 686 581, RESIDING AT
                 KALLAMPALLY, ANAKKAL P.O., KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT -
                 686 507.

                 BY ADVS.
                 SRI.SATHISH MURTHY
                 SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN

RESPONDENTS:

       1         STATE OF KERALA
                 REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF
                 GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

       2         THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
                 HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR,
                 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

       3         THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
                 ERNAKULAM - 682 031.



OTHER PRESENT:

                 SRI. P.M.MANOJ - SR.GP

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21.01.2021,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.25419 OF 2013(B)

                                    2




                             JUDGMENT

I notice that this matter has been filed as early as in the

year 2013 and going by the efflux of time, I am of the view that

this writ petition has now become infructuous.

My view is fortified because even though this matter has

been listed today in the hearing list, there is no representation

for the petitioner. I therefore, dismiss this writ petition for

default, however, also finding it to have become infructuous.

SD/-

                                        DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

rp                                                JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter