Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2124 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 29TH POUSHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.5570 OF 2020(E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 210/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS ,KASARAGOD
CRIME NO.540/2018 OF VIDYA NAGAR POLICE STATION, Kasargod
PETITIONERS:
1 MOIDU M.
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O.ADAM KUNHI, RESIDING AT PARAPPA HOUSE, DELAMPADY,
PARAPPA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD
DISTRICT.
2 MUHAMMED B.P.
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O.BEERAN MOIDEEN, RESIDING AT BERKA, CHERKALA,
CHENGALA VIA., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
3 JAFFER P.M.
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O.MOIDEEN KUNHI, RESIDING AT PARAPPA HOUSE,
DELAMPADY, PARAPPA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD TALUK,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SHAHID AZEEZ
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
VIDYANAGAR POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671
314.
3 ASHRAF C.A.
AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.ABDULLA, RESIDING AT BANATHIL
HOUSE, CHERKALA, CHENGALA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD
DISTRICT - 671 121.
R3 BY ADV. T.MADHU
Crmc 5570/2020 2
PP DHANIL M.RAVINDRAN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crmc 5570/2020 3
V.G.ARUN, J.
===========================
Crl.M.C.No.5570 of 2020
===========================
Dated this the 19th day of January, 2021
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.540 of 2018
registered at the Vidyanagar Police Station for the offence
punishable under Sections 448, 323, 324, 506 r/w 34 of IPC ,
now pending as C.C.No.210 of 2019 of Judicial First Class
Magistrate -I, Kasargod. The de facto complainant at whose
instance the crime was registered is the 3 rd respondent. Annexure
A3 has been filed by the 3 rd respondent, stating that the dispute
has been settled and that he has no subsisting grievance against
the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who, on
instructions, submits that the petitioners have no criminal
antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences alleged,
nature of the injury caused and having perused the affidavit filed
by the 3rd respondent, the contents of which are submitted to be
true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute is settled and
that no public interest is involved in this matter. Moreover, in
view of the settlement, possibility of the criminal proceedings
ending in conviction is remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of process of court and
hence, in view of the legal position set out by the Honourable
Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab
[(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and
another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no impediment in
granting the relief sought.
4. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in
C.C.No.210 of 2019 of Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Kasargod
is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
lgk
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 13/12/2018 IN CRIME NO.540/2018 OF VIDYANAGAR POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 24/12/2018 IN CRIME NO.540/2018 OF VIDYANAGAR POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 20/11/2020 SWORN IN BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!