Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6842 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.5148 OF 2021(P)
PETITIONER/S:
ALBY S
AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.SAJITH S.,
RESIDING AT T.C.5/1230, LIZY COTTAGE,
PIPPINMOODU, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010,
REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
S.MARY LIZY, T.C.5/1230, 'LIZY COTTAGE',
PIPPINMOODU, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010.
BY ADVS.
DR.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN
SRI.S.SAJITH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
CORPORATION MAIN OFFICE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695027,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3 THE ZONAL OFFICER,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
KUDAPPANAKUNNU ZONAL OFFICE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695043.
W.P.(C) No.5148 of 2021
2
4 REMYA, D/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN NAIR,
T.C.20/2155, MLA ROAD, DNRA 18,
PATHIRAPALLY, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695043.
BY SRI.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.5148 of 2021
3
W.P.(C) No.5148 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
The petitioner owns a property within the limits of the second
respondent Corporation. The adjoining property on the south of the property
of the petitioner is a property owned by the fourth respondent. The
grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition concerns the alleged
unauthoroised construction carried out by the fourth respondent in her
property violating the rights of the petitioner. Exts.P2 and P3 are the
complaints lodged by the petitioner in this regard before the second
respondent. It is alleged that Exts.P2 and P3 are not being attended to by
the competent authority of the second respondent. The petitioner therefore
seeks appropriate directions in this regard.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the
learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent.
3. When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the
petitioner only prayed for a direction to the competent authority of the
second respondent to take appropriate action on Exts.P2 and P3 complaints.
4. In the nature of the order I propose to pass in this matter,
no notice need be issued to the fourth respondent.
Having regard to the fact that the limited relief sought by the the
petitioner is only for a direction to the competent authority of the second
respondent to take appropriate action on Exts.P2 and P3 complaints, the writ W.P.(C) No.5148 of 2021
petition is disposed of granting the said relief. The direction aforesaid shall
be complied with, within three weeks from the date of production of a copy
of this judgment, after affording the petitioner as also the fourth respondent
an opportunity of hearing. It is also directed that pending disposal of Exts.P2
and P3, the competent authorities of the second respondent shall ensure
that the construction, if any, of the fourth respondent is in accordance with
the building rules applicable and also the building permit obtained by her.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE rkj W.P.(C) No.5148 of 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DATED 26.3.2019.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION NO.A2/769/21 DATED 9.2.2021 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REMINDER DATED 22.2.2021 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION NO.A2/1119/21 DATED 22.2.2021 PREFERRED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!