Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5566 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 27TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.3984 OF 2021(W)
PETITIONER:
BIJU.R.MOYLAN
AGED 47 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), POWER EQUIPMENT
TESTING (PET) SUB DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY
BOARD LTD, MADAKKATHARA, THRISSUR
BY ADVS.
DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM)
SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR
SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN
SRI.SABU PULLAN
SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN,
PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER (H.R.M),
KEALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN,
PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
ASHOK M CHERIAN SC KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.3984 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 16th day of February 2021
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-
(i) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a time limit that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
(ii) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction to the 2nd respondent to regularizes the appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Engineer with effect from 15.06.2004, the date on which he was temporarily promoted as Assistant Engineer.
(iii) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction to the 2nd respondent to ascertain whether 33 vacancies of Assistant Engineers were available under 10% quota prior to 01.02.2005 and if so, the petitioner may be regularized in the said cadre with effect from 15.06.2004.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned standing counsel appearing for the PSC.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that pointing out the vacancies which were available on WP(C).No.3984 OF 2021
31.05.2005, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 representation
before the 2nd respondent. It is submitted that Ext.P3
representation is liable to be considered in accordance with law.
Having heard the learned standing counsel also, there will
be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take up, consider and pass
orders on Ext.P3 representation preferred by the petitioner within
a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
ssa WP(C).No.3984 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.2.2020 IN WA NO 2343/2019
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.9.2020 IN RP NO 354/2020 IN A NO 2343/2019
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.10.2020
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!