Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5456 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942
Crl.MC.No.254 OF 2021(B)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 325/2018 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
COURT & SESSIONS COURT - II, ALAPPUZHA
CRIME NO.446/2016 OF MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION , Alappuzha
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3:
1 ALBI
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH, KUTTITHARAYIL (H), PAZHAVEEDU WARD,
ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, ALAPPUZHA.
2 SAJI @ SAJEEV
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O. SOMAN, VELIYIL (H), WARD NO.8, MANNANCHERRY
PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ABDUL JALEEL.A
SMT.M.A.SULFIA
RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. REPRESENTED BY SUB
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION,
ALAPPUZHA - 688538.
2 MANIYAPPAN
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O. SREEDHARAN, CHATTUMOOLAYIL (H), WARD NO.8,
MANNANCHERRY PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA - 688 538.
R2 BY ADV. A.E.ALIYAR
OTHER PRESENT:
PP T.R.RENJITH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.M.C.NO.254 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Dated this the 15th day of February 2021
Petitioners are accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime
No.446/2016 registered at the Mannanchery Police
Station, Alappuzha for offences punishable under Sections
109, 294(b), 452, 308, 324 and 323 read with Section 34
of IPC, now pending as S.C.No.325/2018 on the files of
Additional Sessions Court-II, Alappuzha. The de facto
complainant, at whose instance the crime was registered
is arrayed as the 2nd respondent. Annexure-A3 affidavit
has been filed by the 2 nd respondent stating that the
dispute, which was the reason for the incident and
registration of the crime, has been resolved amicably and
he has no subsisting grievance against the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who,
on instructions, submits that the petitioners have no
criminal antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences
alleged, nature of the injury caused and having perused
the affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent, the contents of CRL.M.C.NO.254 OF 2021
which are submitted to be true and voluntary, I am
satisfied that the dispute is settled and no public interest
is involved in this matter. Moreover, in view of the
settlement, possibility of the criminal proceedings ending
in conviction is remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of process of court
and hence, in view of the legal position set out by the
Honourable Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v.
State of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v.
State of Punjab and another [(2012) 10 SCC 303],
there is no impediment in granting the relief sought.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. Annexure A2,
Final Report/Charge Sheet in Crime No.446/2016 of
Mannanchery Police Station and further proceedings in
S.C.No.325/2018 on the files of Additional Sessions
Court-II, Alappuzha are quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE NB CRL.M.C.NO.254 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONERS'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.446/2016 OF MANNANCHERY POLICE STATION ALONG WITH THE STATEMENT OF THE DEFACTO- COMPLAINANT.
ANNEXURE A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT / CHARGE SHEET.
ANNEXURE A3 THE ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!