Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16300 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 17465 OF 2020
PETITIONERS:
1 KUNCHANDY CHACKO
AGED 73 YEARS
S/O.KUNCHANDY,
RESIDING AT PULIYAMKUNNU,
CHERUVAKKAL.P.O,
AYOOR(VIA),KOLLAM.
2 SARAMMA,
AGED 69 YEARS
W/O.KUNCHANDY CHACKO,
RESIDING AT PULIYAMKUNNU,
CHERUVAKKAL.P.O,
AYOOR(VIA),
KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.
M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS
SRI.SHAKTHI PRAKASH
SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN M.S.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECREATARY,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE TAHSILDAR,
OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR,
FIRST FLOOR,
MINI CIVIL STATION,
KOLLAM-TENKASI ROAD,
PANAMKUTTYMALA,
PUNALUR,KERALA-691305.
3 EDAMULAKKAL PANCHAYAT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
EDAYAM.P.O,
ARAKKAL,
WP(C) NO.17465 OF 2020 2
PUNALUR,
KOLLAM-691333.
4 DISTRICT TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION
OF UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION
IN EDAMULAKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER,
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER,KOLLAM-691001.
BY ADVS.
BY R1, R2, & R4 - ADV.SRI.RAJIV JYOTHIS GEORGE
GOVERNMENT PLEADER
BY R3 - ADV.SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY - STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 04.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.17465 OF 2020 3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 4th day of August 2021
The petitioners had constructed a shopping complex
in the 17 cents of land comprised in Survey No.137/5 and
137/8 in Block No.27 of Edamulakkal Village, Kollam District
owned by them. The grievance of the petitioners is that the
Panchayath is not assigning building number to the said
building after regularising certain unauthorised construction.
2. A statement has been filed on behalf of the
Panchayath, wherein it is stated that the petitioners had made
an application for regularisation of the unauthorised
construction and it is in view of the said unauthorised
constructions the building is not numbered. The petitioners
have undertaken that the unauthorised constructions would be
removed. The stand of the Panchayath is that, if the
unauthorised construction is removed as undertaken by the
petitioners before the Panchayath they will consider the
application for numbering the building.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the the petitioners as
well as the learned Government Pleader and the learned
counsel for the Panchayath.
4. An affidavit dated 12.02.2021 is filed by the
petitioners stating that the petitioners have removed the
constructions which the Panchayath refers to as unauthorised
construction. The photograph of the building after removing
the unauthorised structures are also produced along with the
affidavit.
The learned counsel for the Panchayath also submits
that the petitioners had removed the unauthorised structures.
In said circumstances, there will be a direction to the 3 rd
respondent Panchayath to consider and pass orders on the
application of the petitioners for numbering the building. This
shall be done within a period of one month from the date of
receipt of copy of this judgment.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SMF
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17465/2020
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.03.2020 OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED
15.07.2020 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT
TAHSILDAR.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORER NO.TCPKLM/223/2020/C
DATED 09.07.2020 PASSED BY THE 4TH
RESPONDENT COMMITTEE.
EXHIBIT P4 SERIES COPIES OF PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION.
EXHIBIT P5 PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING REMOVAL OF
UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION.
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!