Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kerala State Road Transport ... vs S.S. Saju
2021 Latest Caselaw 16029 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16029 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Kerala State Road Transport ... vs S.S. Saju on 2 August, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                      &
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
         MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1943
                           WA NO. 952 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C).NO.14377/2021 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
                               ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS   1 TO 4:

     1       KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,
             FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 023.

     2       CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
             KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT
             BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 023.

     3       THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
             TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 023.

     4       THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER,
             KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, ALUVA DEPOT,
             ALUVA- 683 101.

             BY SRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC, KSRTC


RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

             S.S. SAJU, THENGUVILA HOUSE, NILAMEL P.O., KOLLAM
             DISTRICT 691 535, CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
             CORPORATION ALUVA DEPOT, ERNAKULAM

             BY ADV SRI.V.PREMCHAND


     THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.08.2021, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A. No. 952 of 2021

                                         2




           ALEXANDER THOMAS & A.BADHARUDEEN, JJ.
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             W.A. No. 952 of 2021
           {arising out of the impugned interim order dated 20.7.2021 in
                               WP(C )No. 14377/2021 }
   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2021

                                JUDGMENT

The learned Single Judge has issued interim order dated

20.7.2021 in WP(C).No.14377/2021 ordering that stay of operation of

impugned Ext.P-1 transfer order dated 8.7.2021 till 10.8.2021. Being

aggrieved by the said interim order dated 20.7.2021 in

WP(C).No.14377/2021, respondents 1 to 4 in the said WP(C) have

preferred the instant intra-court appeal.

2. Heard Sri.Deepu Thankan, learned Standing Counsel for

the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) appearing for

the appellants/respondents 1 to 4 in the WP(C) and Sri.V.Premchand,

learned counsel appearing for the respondent in the W.A./writ

petitioner.

3. It is seen that the impugned interim order passed by the W.A. No. 952 of 2021

learned Single Judge is only to the effect that the impugned Ext.P-1

transfer order shall stand stayed till 10.8.2021, and the case has been

posted to 10.8.2021 for further consideration. After hearing both sides,

we are of the firm view that the present impugned order may not be

amenable for appellate challenge in terms of Sec.5(i) of the Kerala High

Court Act, 1958, in view of the dictum laid down by the larger bench of

this Court in the decision in K.S.Das v. State [1992 (2) KLT 358

(FB)]. In majority verdict, the Larger Bench has held in para 46 of

K.S.Das's case supra that that the word 'order' appearing in Sec.5(i) of

the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, includes apart from other orders,

orders passed by the High Court in miscellaneous petitions filed in writ

petitions, provided the orders are to be in force pending the writ

petition. An appeal would lie against such orders only if the orders

substantially affect or touch upon the substantial rights or liabilities of

the parties or are matters of moment and cause substantial prejudice to

the parties.

4. In view of the abovesaid well settled dictum laid down by

the Larger Bench in K.S.Das's case supra, we are of the view that an W.A. No. 952 of 2021

appeal in this case is not maintainable. However, since, the order

under challenge is a transfer order, we would request the learned

Single Judge to consider the final disposal of the main matter in the

WP(C) without much delay, preferably by the fourth week of August,

2021.

With these observations and directions, the above Writ Appeal

will stand dismissed.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE

MMG

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter