Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11137 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.5482 OF 2020(I)
PETITIONER:
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
CSB BANK LIMITED, (FORMERLY CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK
LTD), ZONAL OFFICE, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 034, REPRESENTED BY NAWIN
THOMAS, S/O. LATE M.J. THOMAS, AGED 46 YEARS, WORKING
AS CHIEF MANAGER, CSB BANK LTD. (FORMERLY CATHOLIC
SYRIAN BANK LTD), ZONAL OFFICE, MARKET ROAD,
ERNAKULAM - 682 035
BY ADV. SHRI.P.PAULOCHAN ANTONY
RESPONDENTS:
1 INDIABULLS FINANCE COMPANY LTD.,
M-62 AND 63, FIRST FLOOR, CONNAUGHT PLACE,
NEW DELHI - 110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
OFFICER, BRANCH OFFICE AT THIRD FLOOR,
TRUST PHARMA BUILDING, KAYYATH LANE,
PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN - 682 025
2 INDIABULLS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. LTD
HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT INDIABULLS HOUSE,
445-451, PHASE V, GURGAON - 122 016, REPRESENTED BY
ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, HAVING OFFICE AT RAVIPURAM,
ERNAKULAM - 682 017
3 BABY SHOP
TC 4/2554(3), INDRAPRASTHAM, KURAVNKONAM,
TRIVANDRUM - 695 003
4 LINI ZACHARIAH
9B, SUMMER BREEZE SEASONS, KURAVANKONAM,
TRIVANDRUM - 695 003
5 AYYAPPAN
9B, SUMMER BREEZE SEASONS, KURAVANKONAM,
TRIVANDRUM - 695 003
6 SUB REGISTRAR
SUB-REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, PATTOM, MUTTADA P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 025
WP(C).No.5482 OF 2020(I) 2
7 VILLAGE OFFICER
KOWDIAR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003
8 NANADAKUMAR R.
R/O. NANDNAM MELAMCODE, P.O. PAZHKUTTY,
NEDUMANNGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 561
R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN
R3-5 BY ADV. SRI.NIDHI SAM JOHNS
R3-5 BY ADV. SRI.LIJO JOSEPH
R3-5 BY ADV. SRI.A.KEVIN THOMAS
R8 BY ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ
R8 BY ADV. SHRI.ARJUN GOPAL P.
SMT MABLE C KURIAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.5482 OF 2020(I) 3
JUDGMENT
Sri.Paulochan Antony, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
submitted that the petitioner is not pressing for any relief in this writ petition
and prays that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In order to avoid any sort of confusion, it is made clear that the interim
order dated 25.2.2020 will stand vacated.
This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE DSV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!