Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11048 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.8275 OF 2021(H)
PETITIONER:
AYYAPPADAS S.
AGED 25 YEARS
S/O.SIVASANKARA PILLAI P.K., RESIDING AT PUNNAKKATTIL
HOUSE, ASRAMAM ROAD, KALADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DT. PIN
682 574
REGISTER NO.140010030
BY ADVS.
SRI.B.S.SIVAJI
SMT.DHANYA SREENIVASAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
MULANKUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR, PIN 680 596,
REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR.
2 THE GOVERNING COUNCIL
KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, MEDICAL COLLEGE
P.O., MULANKUNNATHUKAVU,
THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 596 REP.BY ITS CHAIRPERSON
3 MALPRACTICES AND LAPSES ENQUIRY COMMITTEE
KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, MEDICAL COLLEGE
P.O., MULANKUNNATHUKAVU,
THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 596
REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN
4 THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS
KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH
SCIENCES,MULANKUNNATHUKAVU,
THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 596
5 GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE
KANNUR, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ACADEMY OF MEDICAL
SCIENCES, PARIYARAM) MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O.,
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 503
R1-4 BY ADV. SHRI.P.SREEKUMAR
SMT.NISHA BOSE-GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.8275 OF 2021(H)
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 7th day of April 2021
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
i) To call for the records leading to Exhibit P2 and set aside the same by issuing a writ of certiorari, order or direction.
ii) To issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of 3 rd MBBS Part-II Examinations October, 2020 Examination appeared by the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner was a student of the 5 th
respondent college for the MBBS course for the period 2015-20. A cell
phone was found in his possession while attending the third MBBS
Part II Examination in October 2020. The 3 rd respondent committee
had conducted an enquiry and submitted a recommendation as is
evident from Ext.P2 itself. The recommendation was to cancel the
particular examination of the third MBBS Part II Examination, October
2020 written by the candidate. However, without putting the
petitioner on notice and without accepting the recommendation of
the committee, the 2nd respondent has passed Ext.P2 order dated WP(C).No.8275 OF 2021(H)
03.03.2021 disqualifying the petitioner from appearing in the
University examination at the next chance that is the third MBBS Part
II, May 2021 and to cancel his appearance in the whole examination
that is the third year MBBS Part II Examination, October 2020 (all
subjects). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
he had only been found in possession of a mobile phone and there was
absolutely no allegation that he had used the mobile phone for any
illegal activities. It is submitted that this aspect had been considered
by the 3rd respondent while recommending the lesser penalty to the
petitioner which has not been considered by the 2 nd respondent while
passing Ext.P2 order.
4. The learned Standing Counsel, on instructions submits that
the regulations provided for the higher penalty alone and that is why
an order in the nature of Ext.P2 has been issued.
5. Having considered the contentions advanced on either side, I
find that the recommendation of the 3rd respondent was admittedly
only for cancellation of the particular examination. Before inflicting
the higher penalty of disqualifying the petitioner from appearing in
the University Examination at the next chance and cancelling his WP(C).No.8275 OF 2021(H)
appearance in the third year MBBS Part II Examination in all subjects,
apparently, the petitioner was not put on notice or heard. In the above
view of the matter, I am of the opinion that the issue requires a
reconsideration at the hands of the 2 nd respondent. This writ petition
is accordingly disposed of with the following directions:
Ext.P2 shall be treated as a show cause notice to the petitioner
with regard to the higher penalty imposed on him. The petitioner
shall be free to make a detailed representation in response to Ext.P2
within a week. The petitioner shall be heard by the Registrar of the
University and a report submitted before the Governing Council, who
shall consider the matter after considering the representation of the
petitioner and pass appropriate orders in the matter in the next
Governing Council and at any rate, within a period of six weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SVP WP(C).No.8275 OF 2021(H)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 23/12/2020 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION OF 1ST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER
U.O.NO.16/2021/EXAM GENERAL DATED
3/3/2021 ISSUED BY THE CONTROLLER OF
EXAMINATIONS OF 1ST RESPONDENT
UNIVERSITY.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF
EXAMINATION MANUAL ISSUED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED
7.3.2021 BEFORE THE VICE CHANCELLOR OF
THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS
NO.3109/2018/A1/EX GEN/KUHS DATED
23.3.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!