Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subash S/O Ningappa Kachcharabi vs Sahadevappa S/O Mailareppa
2026 Latest Caselaw 2729 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2729 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Subash S/O Ningappa Kachcharabi vs Sahadevappa S/O Mailareppa on 26 March, 2026

Author: Ravi V.Hosmani
Bench: Ravi V.Hosmani
                                                         -1-
                                                                     NC: 2026:KHC-D:4711
                                                                 MFA No. 102323 of 2014


                             HC-KAR



                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
                                   DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
                                                   BEFORE
                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
                            MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.102323 OF 2014 (MV-D)
                            BETWEEN:
                                 SUBASH S/O NINGAPPA KACHCHARABI,
                                 DECEASED BY HIS LRS,

                            1.A DURGAMMA W/O SUBASH KACHACHARABI,
                                AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
                                R/A ASUNDI VILLAGE,
                                TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
                            1.B MANJUNATH S/O SUBASH KACHACHARABI,
                                AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
                                R/O: ASUNDI VILLAGE,
                                TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
                                                                             ...APPELLANTS
                            (BY SRI LOKESH MALAVALLI, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
                            AND:
                            1.   SAHADEVAPPA S/O MAILAREPPA KACHACHARABI,
                                 AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
                                 R/O: ASUNDI VILLAGE, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.

CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
                            2.   THE CLAIMS EXECUTIVE (LEGAL),
KATTIMANI

Digitally signed by
                                 SRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
Location: High Court of
Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
                                 B-8, EPIP-RICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR,
                                 JAIPUR, RAJASTAN STATE.
Date: 2026.03.27 09:25:09
+0000




                                                                            ...RESPONDENTS
                            (BY SRI SK KAYAKAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (VC);
                            NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)

                                  THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT 1988,
                            AGAINST JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12.06.2014, PASSED IN
                            MVC.NO.691/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
                            JUDGE AND AMACT, RANEBENNUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
                            PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
                            COMPENSATION PETITION AGAINST RESPONDENT NO.2 IS HEREBY
                            DISMISSED & ETC.
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC-D:4711
                                         MFA No. 102323 of 2014


 HC-KAR




    THIS MFA COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI

                            ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for respondents appears through Video

Conferencing.

2. No representation for appellants.

3. It is seen even on previous date, noting absence on

behalf of appellants, matter was ordered to be re-listed,

cautioning that appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution in

case of further non-appearance. Despite same, there is absence.

This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing

appeal, though appeal is more than twelve years old.

4. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution

imposing costs of Rs.10,000/- payable to Advocates' Welfare

Fund, Bengaluru.

Sd/-

(RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE

SMM, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter