Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chethan vs State By Ashoknagar Police
2026 Latest Caselaw 2241 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2241 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Chethan vs State By Ashoknagar Police on 12 March, 2026

Author: M.G.S. Kamal
Bench: M.G.S. Kamal
                                           -1-
                                                         NC: 2026:KHC:14818
                                                    CRL.A No. 288 of 2026


               HC-KAR



                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                        DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
                                          BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
                     CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2026 (U/S 14(A) (2)
              BETWEEN:

              CHETHAN
              S/O LATE MUNIRAJU
              AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
              R/AT 18, 7TH, D, CROSS
              ROSE GARDEN, NEELASANDRA
              BENGALORE - 571 301.
                                                                ...APPELLANT
              (BY SRI RAJU C.N, ADV.)
              AND:

              1.   STATE BY ASHOKNAGAR POLICE
                   BENGALORE, REPRESENTED BY SPP
                   HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                   AT BANGALORE - 560 009.

              2.   SUSHMITHA
                   W/O MAHADEV
                   AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
Digitally
signed by          R/AT. 45, THIMMAPPA
NANDINI M S        GARDEN, NEELASANDRA
Location:          BENGALURU - 560 047.
HIGH COURT                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
OF
KARNATAKA     (BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R-1;
                  MS. KANNIKA N, ADV., FOR R-2)

                   THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14(A)2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT
              PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.02.2026 PASSED BY
              THE LXX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND PSL.JUDGE
              BENGALURU    IN   CRL.MISC.NO.114/2026    ARISING   OUT   OF
              CR.NO.313/2025 OF ASHOK NAGAR POLICE BENGALURU FOR THE
              OFFENCE P/U/S 69 OF BNS AND SEC.3(2)(VA) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.

                   THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
              JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:14818
                                           CRL.A No. 288 of 2026


 HC-KAR



CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is by the accused in Crime No.313/2025

registered by Ashoknagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the

offences punishable under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'BNS, 2023') and Sections 3(1)(r),

3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, 'the Act').

2. The allegation against the accused/appellant is that he

befriended the victim/respondent No.2 and by promising to

marry her, had forced her to obtain divorce from her husband.

Victim used to reside in a rented house and accused/appellant

used to frequently visit her house and she became pregnant

out of her relationship with the accused/appellant and she also

gave birth to a girl child. Further, the accused/appellant refused

to marry her as promised, which constrained the victim to

lodge the complaint before Ashoknagar Police Station on

07.10.2025 for the offences noted above. Accused/appellant

was arrested 01.11.2025 and has been in confinement since

then. Accused/appellant had moved an application under

NC: 2026:KHC:14818

HC-KAR

Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for

short, 'BNSS, 2023') seeking regular bail on the file of the

Court of LXX Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in

Crl. Misc. No.114/2026, which came to be dismissed by order

dated 06.02.2026. Being aggrieved by the same,

accused/appellant is before this Court.

3. Notice of this appeal was issued to the victim/respondent

no.2 who is present before this Court with her child, and is

represented by her Counsel Ms. Kannika.N.

4. Learned Counsel for respondent no.2 has no objection in

considering the application of the appellant-accused for release

on bail and she has also filed a memo indicating her no

objection for the said purpose.

5. Heard. Perused the records.

6. Notwithstanding the 'no objection' indicated by

respondent no.2, it is seen that charge sheet has already been

filed. The allegation is that the accused-appellant had

committed breach of promise to marry respondent no.2 and

had emotionally exploited her and she became pregnant of his

NC: 2026:KHC:14818

HC-KAR

child. Whether the accused had promised to marry and had

misused the circumstances is a matter which requires to be

adjudicated and determined after the trial. Since the charge

sheet is already filed and in the light of the circumstances

narrated above, more particularly the submission being made

on behalf of respondent no.2 by her Counsel, this Court deems

it appropriate to allow the appeal. Accordingly, the following

order:

(i) Criminal appeal is allowed.

(ii) The impugned order dated 06.02.2026 passed by the Court of LXX Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge & Spl. Judge, Bengaluru, in Crl. Misc. No.114/2026 is set aside.

(iii) The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.313/2025 registered by Ashoknagar Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, subject to the following conditions:

a) Appellant shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

b) The appellant shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless

NC: 2026:KHC:14818

HC-KAR

the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

c) The appellant shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

d) The appellant shall not involve in similar offences in future;

e) The appellant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the case registered against him is disposed off.

Sd/-

(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter