Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr Mohd Moheed vs The Principal Secretary
2026 Latest Caselaw 2224 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2224 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr Mohd Moheed vs The Principal Secretary on 12 March, 2026

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                             -1-
                                                         NC: 2026:KHC-K:2343
                                                      WP No. 200513 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                      KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                        WRIT PETITION NO. 200513 OF 2026 (KLR-CON)
                   BETWEEN:

                   MR. MOHD MOHEED
                   S/O MOHD. ABDUL KHADEER,
                   AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                   R/O. RAVULPALLY VILLAGE,
                   KODANGAL MANDAL,
                   VIKHARABAD DISTRICT-509 338.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. SUNEEL KUMAR KALEKAR, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
Digitally signed        DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE COMMISSIONERATE,
by SACHIN               THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                KANDAYA BHAVAN,
KARNATAKA               K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.

                   2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
                        REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
                        THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                        KALABURAGI TOWN AND DISTRICT-585 102.

                   3.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
                        REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
                        MINI VIDHAN SABA, SEDAM POST AND TALUKA
                        KALABURAGI DISTRICT-585 222.
                                  -2-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC-K:2343
                                          WP No. 200513 of 2026


 HC-KAR




4.   THE TAHSILDAR,
     THE OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR,
     SEDAM TALUKA,
     KALABURAGI DISTRICT-585332.
                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA )

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS SET ASIDE REJECTION
ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO RESPONDENT
NO. 4 FOR CONVERSION OF AGRICULTURE LAND IN TO NON
AGRICULTURE LAND IN SY NO. 125 TO AN EXTENT OF AC. 1.00
GTS OF MDEAK VILLAGE SESAM THALUK KALABURAGI
DISTRICT AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT RESPONDENT NO. 2
TO RESPONDENT NO.4 TO DO CONVERT AGRICULTURE LAND
INTO NON-AGRICULTURE LAND BY CONSIDERING DOCUMENTS
FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF SY NO. 125 TO AN
EXTENT AC.1.00 GTS OF MEDAK VILLAGE SEDAM, TALUK
KALABURAGI DISTRICT. B) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT OR
DIRECTION WHICH THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMED FIT UNDER
THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM:     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                          ORAL ORDER

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India, is filed seeking for the following reliefs:

(a) A writ in the nature of mandamus set aside rejection order passed by the respondent No.2 to respondent No.4 for conversion of agriculture land into non-agriculture land in Sy.No.125 to an extent of

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2343

HC-KAR

Accused. 1-00 Gts of Medak village, Sedam Taluka, Kalaburgi district and consequently direct respondent No.2 to respondent No.4 to do convert agriculture land into non-agriculture land by considering documents filed by the petitioner in respect of Sy.No.125 to an extent Accused.1-00 Gts of Medak village, Sedam Taluka, Kalaburgi district;

(b) Issue any other writ or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the

respondents.

3. The petitioner who has purchased the land bearing

Survey No.125, measuring 0.20 guntas situated at Medak

village, Sedam taluka, under a registered sale deed dated

17.02.2025 from Smt. Padmamma D/o. Bhadrayya appears to

have filed an application seeking conversion of the aforesaid

land from agriculture to non-agriculture purpose. The said

application has been rejected by the respondent-Deputy

Commissioner vide endorsement at Annexure-C. Aggrieved by

the same, the petitioner is before this Court.

4. Perusal of the material on record would go to show

that, the land in dispute is an Inam Land. Sri.Bhadrayya who is

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2343

HC-KAR

the father of the vendor of the petitioner, had filed an

application before the jurisdictional Land Tribunal for granting

occupancy rights of the said land and considering the same,

vide order dated 19.09.1984, the Land Tribunal has granted

occupancy rights of the aforesaid land in favour of

Sri.Bhadrayya. The Registered sale deed has been executed in

favour of the petitioner in respect of the aforesaid land by Smt.

Padmamma who is the daughter of the aforesaid Sri.Bhadrayya

on 11.12.2025 and petitioner claims right, title and interest

over the land measuring 0.20 guntas under the aforesaid sale

deed and it appears that the revenue records of the land in

question were also transferred in his name.

5. The Deputy Commissioner has rejected the

petitioner's application for conversion of the aforesaid land from

agriculture to non-agriculture purpose based on the report of

the Tahasildar dated 14.11.2025, wherein it is stated that, the

land bearing Survey No.125/2 measuring 20 guntas is a Inam

Land. However, the fact remains that, Sri. Bhadrayya who is

the father of the petitioner's vendor was granted occupancy

rights of the entire extent of 03 acre 24 guntas in Survey

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2343

HC-KAR

No.125 of Medak village, Sedam taluka under order Annexure-B

dated 19.09.1984.

6. Under the circumstances, the impugned

endorsement issued by the Deputy Commissioner cannot be

sustained. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

(i) The writ petition is allowed;

(ii) The impugned endorsement at Annexure-

C issued by the respondent-Deputy Commissioner rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking conversion of his land bearing Survey No.125, measuring 20 guntas situated at Medak village, Sedam taluk, Kalaburagi district, is quashed and the Deputy Commissioner is directed to consider the said application afresh in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, but not later than a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67 CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter