Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Sarbanu Khatun vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 2178 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2178 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Sarbanu Khatun vs State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2026

                                             -1-
                                                         NC: 2026:KHC:14550
                                                     CRL.P No. 2317 of 2026


                 HC-KAR




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                          BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
                   CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2317 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC)/
                                        483(BNSS))

                 BETWEEN:

                 SMT SARBANU KHATUN
                 W/O S.K ALANGIR,
                 AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
                 RESIDING AT AND C/O:
                 YELLAREDDY PROPERTY SHED
                 HULIMANGALA PODU VILLAGE,
                 JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
                 BENGALURU DISTRICT.

Digitally
signed by        PERMANENT RESIDENT OF
SREEDHARAN
BANGALORE        NANDIGRAM, KALICHARANPUR,
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI          P.O GARCHARABERIA,
Location: High
Court of         NANDIGRAM P.S.,
Karnataka
                 PURBA MEDINIPUR DISTRICT,
                 JALPAI PART VII,
                 WEST BENGAL - 721 631.                       ... PETITIONER


                 (BY SRI. MOHAMMAD RASHEEF M., ADVOCATE)
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC:14550
                                   CRL.P No. 2317 of 2026


HC-KAR




AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION

REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT BUILDING

BANGALORE - 560 001.                        ... RESPONDENT


(BY SMT. ANITHA GIRISH N., HCGP)

       THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC

(FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER

ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO.23/2026 OF HEBBAGODI

POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 152, 196, 197(1)

AND 353(1) OF THE BNS 2023 FILED BY IV ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE

AND JMFC ANEKAL.


       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:



CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
                             -3-
                                         NC: 2026:KHC:14550
                                     CRL.P No. 2317 of 2026


HC-KAR




                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by the petitioner who is

arraigned as sole accused in Crime No.23/2026 filed by

the respondent-Police for the offence punishable under

Sections 152, 196, 197(1), 353(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on

11.01.2026 at about 08.30 a.m., the complainant had

been to the Police Station to collect the confidential

information. It was around 01.00 p.m., the complainant

was browsing social media through the mobile phone, at

that time he saw a video, where it was found that huts

were being cleared and a person was capturing the video

of the said operation and they were shouting "Jai Bharat

Mata Ki Jai". Later, a woman was seen walking in the said

area. When she was asked to say "Jai Bharat Mata Ki Jai",

the woman shouted a slogan as "Jai Bangla". Then she

went little ahead and shouted slogan "Jai Bharat Mata Ki

NC: 2026:KHC:14550

HC-KAR

Jai". A case has been registered against an unknown

woman deliberately called "Jai Bangla" with an intention to

hurt the sentiments of Indians and also feelings of them

and also it undermines the national unity and sovereignty.

Based on the said information, the respondent-Police have

registered a case and the investigation is under progress.

The petitioner has been arrested on 12.01.2026 and she is

in judicial custody.

3. Heard Sri.Mohammad Rasheef M., learned

counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Anitha Girish N.,

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-

State.

4. It is the submission of learned counsel for the

petitioner is that the petitioner is the permanent resident

of West Bengal, however, she is working in Prestige Cass

Villa, situated at Hebbagodi as a housemaid. She had no

intention to hurt either feeling or sentiment of the Indians.

When she was provoked to say "Jai Bharat Mata Ki Jai", in

NC: 2026:KHC:14550

HC-KAR

order to avoid further conflict, she might have uttered

such slogan. The petitioner is a woman and aged about 25

years. She is having two children and she has to take care

of them. Therefore, she may be enlarged on bail by

imposing suitable conditions. Makings of submissions

learned counsel for the petitioner prays to allow the

petition.

5. Per Contra, the learned High Court Government

Pleader for the respondent - State vehemently submitted

that the slogan which she had made would certainly hurt

the feelings and sentiments of Indians. She, being an

Indian, shouted a slogan as "Jai Bangla", which is really

hurting the sentiments of Indians. Based on the footage

circulated in the social media, a case has been registered

against the petitioner and she has been arrested. Since

she is a permanent resident of West Bengal, there may be

chances of absconding from the case if she is released on

bail. Hence the bail application has to be rejected. Making

NC: 2026:KHC:14550

HC-KAR

such submission learned High Court Government Pleader

prays to dismiss the petition.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the respective

parties. Perused the averments of the complaint, which

indicates that the authority was clearing the sheds which

were constructed unauthorizedly in the government land.

The said process was being captured by one of the

persons. At that time, a person had instigated the

petitioner herein to shout a slogan as "Jai Bharat Mata Ki

Jai". However, she called "Jai Bangla" and thereafter,

again, she shouted the slogan as "Jai Bharat Mata Ki Jai"

thrice. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

the case and also the fact that she is having two minor

children and she has to take care of them, it is appropriate

to grant her bail by imposing suitable conditions that

would take care of the apprehension of the prosecution.

7. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

NC: 2026:KHC:14550

HC-KAR

ORDER

i. This Criminal Petition is allowed.

ii. The petitioner is order to be enlarged on bail on

in Crime No.23/2026 of respondent-Police for the

offence punishable under Sections 152, 196,

197(1), 353(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023 on executing a personal bond for a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with one

local surety to the like sum of the satisfaction of

the Trial Court.

iii. The petitioner shall not commit any similar

offence till disposal of the present case.

iv. The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court

on all hearing dates.

v. The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution

witnesses.

NC: 2026:KHC:14550

HC-KAR

In case, if the petitioner violates any of the bail

conditions as stated above, liberty is reserved to the

prosecution to file necessary application for cancellation of

bail.

Sd/-

(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NR/-

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter