Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Mallika Hegade vs Smt. Jalaja Shedthi @ Jalaja Shetty
2026 Latest Caselaw 542 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 542 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Mallika Hegade vs Smt. Jalaja Shedthi @ Jalaja Shetty on 27 January, 2026

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2026:KHC:4273
                                                         WP No. 812 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                            BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 812 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SMT. MALLIKA HEGADE
                         W/O LATE NARAYAN H. SHETTY,
                         AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.

                   2.    MR.NISHITH N SHETTY
                         S/O LATE NARAYAN H SHETTY
                         AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

                         BOTH PETITIONER NO. 1 AND 2
                         RESIDING AT NO.303, 3RD CROSS
                         INDRANI APARTMENT, DESHPANDE NAGAR
                         HUBLI, TRAFFIC ISLAND
                         HUBBALLI - 580 029.
Digitally signed                                               ...PETITIONERS
by
SHARADAVANI
B                  (BY SRI. VINAYAK MEGUNDI, ADVOCATE)
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka          AND:

                   1.    SMT. JALAJA SHEDTHI @ JALAJA SHETTY
                         W/O. LATE HIRIYANNA SHETTY,
                         AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
                         RESIDING AT NO.303, 3RD CROSS,
                         INDRANI APARTMENT, DESHPANDE NAGAR,
                         HUBLI, TRAFFIC ISLAND,
                         HUBBALLI - 580 029.
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC:4273
                                      WP No. 812 of 2026


HC-KAR




2.   MR. RAVINDRA H SHETTY,
     S/O. LATE HIRIYANNA SHETTY,
     AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT FLAT NO.103, VENKATAGIRI,
     OPP. BAPPANADU TEMPLE, BAPPANADU,
     MULKI - 574 154, D.K. DISTRICT.

3.   MRS. SUJATHA P. SHETTY
     D/O LATE HIRIYANNA SHETTY
     AND W/O PADMANABHA SHETTY
     AGD ABOUT 57 YEARS
     R/AT NO.A-12, ASHOKA APARTMENT
     BHAVANI NAGAR, KESHWAPUR
     HUBBALLI - 580 023.

4.   MR. JAGADEESHA H SHETTY
     S/O. LATE HIRIYANNA SHETTY,
     AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT NEO. A-12, ASHOKA APARTMENT,
     BHAVANI NAGAR, KESHWAPUR,
     HUBBALLI - 580 023.

5.   MRS. SUREKHA S. SHETTY,
     D/O. LATE HIRIYANNA SHETTY,
     AND W/O. MR SURESH,
     AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT NO.2-182C, "SHRI KRISHNA",
     GUME BETTU, 76 BADAGUMANE,
     NEAR BHARATH RICE MILL, ALEVOOR,
     UDUPI TALUK - 574 118.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
      THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ORDER DATED 05.12.2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL
                                -3-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC:4273
                                              WP No. 812 of 2026


HC-KAR




SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M, UDUPI, ON THE APPLICATION
FILED UNDER ORDER XIV RULE 2 CPC IN O.S.NO.139/2024
(ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.,

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR


                           ORAL ORDER

This petition by the defendants in O.S. No.139/2024 on

the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Udupi, is

directed against the impugned order dated 05.12.2025

whereby the application filed by the petitioner - defendant No.2

under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC to decide additional Issue No.1 as

a preliminary issue and decided the same before proceeding

further in the matter was rejected by the trial Court by holding

as under -

The Defendant No.2 filed application under Order XIV Rule 2 of CPC prays the court to take additional issue No.1 as preliminary issue and decide it before proceed with the matter.

Defendant No.2 sworn to an affidavit, wherein he is stated that the plaintiff have filed the suit for partition and for separate possession, in respect of the family properties. The court had framed the issues, wherein, the additional issue No.1 is with

NC: 2026:KHC:4273

HC-KAR

regard to question of limitation. This issue goes to the root of the suit as it decided the maintainability of the suit. Accordingly, pray the court to treat the said issue as preliminary issue.

The plaintiff filed objections to the L.A. filed by the defendant No.2.

Heard.

The plaintiff filed the suit for partition and for separate possession. The defendant has taken the contention that the suit is barred by limitation and cause of action is also barred by limitation Under Order XIV Rule 2 of CPC. only those issues which are pure issues of law and which can dispose all the suit can be treated as preliminary issue. Wherein, issue involves mixed question of law and facts cannot be tried preliminary issue.

In the present case, the additional issue No.1 framed by this court is of limitation which is mixed question of law and fact. Therefore, it does not fallen within the ambit of Order XIV Rule 2(2) of CPC. Hence, application filed by the defendant No.2 to treat the additional issue No.1 as preliminary issues is not maintainable. The said issue shall be tried along with the other issues at the time of full fledged trial. Moreover, the cause of action is deniable of facts. Now at this stage, one cannot be decided the suit as barred by limitation and there is no cause of action to file the suit, since the cause of action regarding continuous and not stagnant. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

I.A. filed by the Defendant No.2 under Order XIV Rule 2 of CPC is hereby rejected.

NC: 2026:KHC:4273

HC-KAR

2. A perusal of the material on record including the

impugned order will indicate that the trial Court has come to

the correct conclusion that additional issue No.1 framed by the

trial Court as regards limitation gave rise to a mixed question

of fact and law which would not fall within the scope and ambit

of "pure question of law" as contemplated under Order XIV Rule

2 CPC as a consequence of which the said issue pertaining to

limitation, which is a mixed question of fact and law, cannot be

treated as a preliminary issue as held by the Apex Court in

several judgments including the case of P Kumarakuruban

vs. P Narayan and others reported in 2025 SCC Online SC

975.

3. Under these circumstances, I do not find any

illegality or infirmity in the impugned order which cannot be

said to occasion failure of justice warranting interference by

this Court as held by the Apex Court in the case of Radhey

Shyam and Ors v Chhabi Nath and Ors - (2015) 5 SCC

423; K.P. Natarajan and Ors. vs. Muthalammal and Ors -

AIR 2021 SC 3443; and in Mohd. Ali v V. Jaya - (2022)

10 SCC 477. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the

petition and the same is hereby disposed of without interfering

NC: 2026:KHC:4273

HC-KAR

with the impugned order. However, it is made clear that all

rival contentions on all issues including the additional issue

regarding limitation are kept open and no opinion is expressed

on the merits/demerits of the rival contentions.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter