Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 434 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:3838
CRP No. 218 of 2018
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.218 OF 2018 (RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. DORESWAMY
S/O.SURADAYA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT
KADAKOLA VILLAGE,
JAYAPURA HOBLI,
MYSURU TALUK-571311.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. D L SURESH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. S VASANTHA KUMARI
D/O.LATE D.SHIVAMALLU,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
Digitally signed RESIDING AT NO.89, NGO COLONY,
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA RAJENDRANAGAR,
Location: HIGH N.R.MOHALLA,
COURT OF MYSURU.
KARNATAKA
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. P NATARAJU., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.01.2018, PASSED BY THE
LEARNED II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU IN
M.A.NO.01/2016 AND THE ORDER DATED 16.11.2015 PASSED IN
MIS.NO.63/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AT MYSURU IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:3838
CRP No. 218 of 2018
HC-KAR
THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the
following reliefs:
Set aside the judgment dated 19.01.2018 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Mysuru in M.A.No.01/2016 and the order dated 16.11.2015 passed in Mis No.63/2010 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Mysuru in the interest of justice and equity.
2. A compromise petition had been filed which was
recorded by this Court vide its order dated
27.06.2024. There being certain obligations to be
fulfilled by both the parties, the matter was being
adjourned from time to time.
3. Today, a memo has been filed by the counsel for
respondent enclosing a possession letter. In terms
thereof, it is stated that respondent has taken
possession of the suit schedule property post the
execution of sale deed by the petitioner in favour of
respondent. The payments, which were required to
NC: 2026:KHC:3838
HC-KAR
be made, have been made by respondent to the
petitioner, which has been recorded from time to
time in the order sheet of this case.
4. In that view of the matter, the obligations of the
petitioner towards the respondent and the obligations
of the respondent towards the petitioner in terms of
the aforesaid compromise having been completed,
the petition stands disposed taking on record that
the sale has been executed by the petitioner in
favour of the respondent.
SD/-
(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!