Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Basavaraju V vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 955 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 955 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Basavaraju V vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                  -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:7095
                                                        CRL.P No. 15460 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15460 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                            482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    BASAVARAJU V
                            S/O VENKATARAMNAYAK
                            AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

                      2.    RACHAPPAJI @ RACHANAIKA
                            S/O LATE SIDDANAIK
                            AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

                      3.    KRISHNA @ KRISHNANAIKA
                            S/O LATE BELLANAYAK
                            AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

                      4.    MAHADEVANAYAKA @ MOODALSEEME
                            MAHADEVANAYAKA
Digitally signed by         S/O MADANAYAK
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                      5.    SIDDARAJANAYAKA
                            S/O KARINAIK
                            AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

                      6.    MAHADEVANAYAKA
                            S/O THIMMANAYAK
                            AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

                      7.    SHIVANNANAYAKA
                            S/O HONKARANAYAK
                            AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC:7095
                                 CRL.P No. 15460 of 2025


HC-KAR




8.   CHENNANAYAKA
     S/O LAKSHMANANAYAK
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

     RESIDENT OF
     YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
     GUNDLUPETE TALUK
     CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT
     PIN-571 111
                                          ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. OMKAR MUTTAGI, ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI. SHARAS CHANDRA M, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGUR P.S
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT
(THROUGH THE S.P.P
HIGH COURT PREMISES
BENGALURU CITY-560 001)
                                          ...RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C
(FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.04.2025 IN CRL. MISC NO.
485/2024 AND ALSO ORDER DATED 25.04.2025 IN CRL. MISC
NO.51/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION
306, 114, R/W SECTION 149 OF I.P.C AND ENLARGE THEM ON
ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH THE CRIME NO.
201/2023    (CC   NO.432/2024)   TRIED  FOR   OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 306, 114, R/W SECTION 149
OF I.P.C PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE     (JR.DN)   AND    JMFC    COURT,   GUNDLUPET,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                              -3-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC:7095
                                    CRL.P No. 15460 of 2025


HC-KAR




CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR




                      ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed by accused Nos. 10, 18, 19,

21, 22, 23, 24, 27 under Section 482 of BNSS praying to

grant anticipatory bail in Crime No. 201/2023 of Beguru

Police Station registered for offence under Sections 306,

114 read with Section 149 of IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and

learned HCGP for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners would contend

that the petitioners were not members of the panchayat.

The allegation is that panchayat members had imposed

fine on C.W.2 to C.W.4 for having assaulted each other

with chappal and it was questioned by the deceased

Shivaraju and to him also, fine has been imposed.

Deceased is stated to have committed suicide as he had

been insulted by imposition of fine. It is stated that the

deceased has left a death note. Death note is not part of

NC: 2026:KHC:7095

HC-KAR

the chargesheet. Investigation is over and chargesheet is

filed. Petitioners are not required for any custodial

interrogation. The offence alleged against the petitioners is

not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life.

There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. With

this he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that

the petitioners were members of the panchayat which

imposed fine not only on C.W.2 to C.W.4 but also on the

deceased. The deceased, as he was insulted by imposition

of fine, left death note and committed suicide by hanging

with a saree in the house. There is a prima facie case

against the petitioners for offences alleged against them.

With this, she prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties,

this Court has perused the chargesheet and other

materials placed on record.

NC: 2026:KHC:7095

HC-KAR

6. The accusation in the chargesheet against the

petitioners is that they were members of the panchayat

and they have imposed fine on C.W.2 to C.W.4 for having

assaulted each other with chappal. When deceased

questioned them, they also imposed fine on the deceased.

The deceased, being insulted by imposition of fine, left

death note and committed suicide by hanging with a saree

in the house. Whether the alleged act of the petitioners

imposing fine on the deceased amounts abetment to

commit suicide or not is a matter of trial. As chargesheet

is filed petitioners are not required for custodial

interrogation. The offence alleged against the petitioners is

not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life.

There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners.

7. Considering the above aspects, petitioners have

made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with

conditions.

In the result, the following

NC: 2026:KHC:7095

HC-KAR

ORDER

Petition is allowed. Petitioners are ordered to be

released on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.

201/2023 of Beguru Police Station subject to following

conditions.

I. Petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional

Court within 15 days from this day and execute bail

bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with one

surety for the likesum with the satisfaction of the

jurisdictional Court.

II. Petitioners shall not tamper the prosecution

witnesses either directly or indirectly.

III. Petitioners shall attend the trial Court on all dates of

the hearing unless exempted and cooperate for

speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter