Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Sunil Kumar vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1304 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1304 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Sunil Kumar vs State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC:9302
                                                       CRL.P No. 16074 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 16074 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                            482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI. SUNIL KUMAR
                            S/O JAYARAMAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
                            R/AT MUSTOOR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI
                            CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI DEVENDRA N, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY CHIKKABALLAPUR WOMEN POLICE STATION
                            CHIKKABALLAPUR
                            REPRESENTED BY;
Digitally signed by         STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Location: HIGH              BENGALURU - 560 001.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                                                      ...RESPONDENT

                      (BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP
                       SRI SURESH S, ADVOCATE FOR DEFACTO COMPLAINANT)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.PC (FILED
                      UNDER SECTION 482 BNNS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE HIM ON
                      BAIL IN CRIME No.0095/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES
                      PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 115(2), 351(2), 69, 351(3)
                      R/W 3(5), 89 OF BNS REGISTERED BY CHIKKABALLAPUR
                      WOMEN POLICE       STATION  CHIKKABALLAPUR    DISTRICT
                             -2-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC:9302
                                   CRL.P No. 16074 of 2025


HC-KAR




(RESPONDENT HEREIN) AS BAIL APPLICATION FLED UNDER
SECTION 482 OF BNSS 2023.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section

482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime

No.95/2025 of Chikkaballapura Women Police Station

registered for offences punishable under Sections 115(2),

351(2), 69, 351(3) read with Section 3(5), 89 of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent

-State who is assisted by learned counsel for defacto

complainant.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed that

there was love affair between petitioner and the victim girl

and they stayed together for 08 years. The alleged sexual

intercourse is consensual. The complaint has been filed at

the instigation of C.W.2 to C.W.5. Now the charge sheet

NC: 2026:KHC:9302

HC-KAR

has been filed and therefore, the petitioner is not required

for custodial interrogation. The offences alleged against

the petitioner are not punishable either with death or

imprisonment for life. There are no criminal antecedents of

the petitioner. With this, he prays to allow the petion.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for the respondent -State who is assisted by

learned counsel for defacto complainant would contend

that the petitioner has used the victim lady for 08 years

under the promise of marriage. The victim became

pregnant two times and she was aborted. The petitioner

took Rs.35,00,000/- from the victim lady and he has not

returned. The mother of the petitioner has issued cheque

for Rs.35,00,000/- in favour of the victim lady and the

said cheque has been dishonoured. The charge sheet

materials show prima facie case against the petitioner for

offences alleged against him. With this, he prayed to reject

the petition.

NC: 2026:KHC:9302

HC-KAR

5. Having heard learned counsels, the Court has

perused the charge sheet and other materials placed on

the record.

6. As per charge sheet, the case of the

prosecution is that accused No.1 -petitioner and C.W.1 -

victim lady were loving each other and they both resided

in the house of this petitioner and lead life. The petitioner

under the promise of marriage had sexual intercourse with

the victim lady several times and accused Nos.2 to 4 have

cooperated for the said aspect. The petitioner did not

marry the victim lady and victim did insisted the petitioner

to marry her and therefore all accused on 10.01.2025

assaulted C.W.1 and sent her out of their house and gave

her threat over phone to kill her by pouring petrol. The

investigation is over. The charge sheet has been filed and

therefore, the petitioner is not required for custodial

interrogation. The offences alleged against the petitioner

are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for

life. The petitioner has undertaken to appear before the

NC: 2026:KHC:9302

HC-KAR

trial Court on all dates of hearing and abide by any

conditions to be imposed by this Court. Whether the

petitioner has not kept up his promise to marry the victim

lady and whether he had promised her to marry her is

matter of trial. There are no criminal antecedents of the

petitioner. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with

conditions.

7. In the result, the following

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The petitioner -accused No.1 is ordered to be

released on bail in the event of his arrest in

Crime No.95/2025 of Chikkaballapura Women

Police Station subject to following conditions.:

a) The petitioner -accused No.1 shall

voluntarily appear before the jurisdictional

Court within 15 days from this day and

NC: 2026:KHC:9302

HC-KAR

execute a bail bond for a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like

sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional

Court.

b) The petitioner -accused No.1shall not

tamper the prosecution witnesses either

directly or indirectly.

c) The petitioner -accused No.1shall attend the

trial Court on all dates hearing unless

exempted and co-operate for speedy

disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DSP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter