Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr Shivanna vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1092 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1092 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr Shivanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                               -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:7878
                                                         CRL.P No. 224 of 2026


                      HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                             BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                        CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 224 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                           483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      MR. SHIVANNA
                      S/O VENKATAPPA
                      AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
                      POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR
                      CHIKKAJALA P.S, BENGALURU
                      R/A NO.300, NEAR HANUMAN TEMPLE
                      KODAGALAHATTI, BENGALURU-562 157
                                                                  ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA       BENGALURU URBAN DIVISION
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH        REP. BY ITS SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                      BANGALORE - 01
                                                                 ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. MANISH R, ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE )

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.PC
                      (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE
                      THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.62/2025 REGISTERED FOR
                      THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 7(a) OF
                      PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT BY THE RESPONDENT i.e.,
                      KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, AND
                                -2-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC:7878
                                        CRL.P No. 224 of 2026


HC-KAR




PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE CUM SPECIAL JUDGE (P.C.ACT) BENGALURU
(CCH-24).

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by the sole accused under

Section 483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime

No.62/2025 of Karnataka Lokayuktha Police Station,

Bengaluru City registered for offence punishable under

Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would

contend that the trap has been laid on the petitioner on

23.12.2025 and Rs.50,000/- has been recovered from the

petitioner. There was hand wash and drawing of trap

mahazar. Even the sample voice of the petitioner has been

NC: 2026:KHC:7878

HC-KAR

collected. In trap cases, major portion of the investigation

will be over on the day of trap. The petitioner is in judicial

custody since 23.12.2025. As major portion of

investigation is over, he is not required for further

custodial interrogation. The petitioner is ready to abide by

any conditions to be imposed by this Court. With this, he

prays to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent

would contend that in the entrustment mahazar, there is

clear mention of conversation between the petitioner and

the complainant with regard to demand of bribe. The

petitioner has accepted the bribe amount kept in his bike

and it has been recovered from the petitioner. There is

clear demand and acceptance of bribe attracting offence

punishable under Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption

Act. The investigation is in process. With this, he prays to

reject the petition.

NC: 2026:KHC:7878

HC-KAR

5. Having heard learned counsels, the Court has

perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on

record.

6. The petitioner was working as PSI and case has

been registered against the complainant in Crime

No.105/2025. The complainant was also rowdy sheeter. In

order to close the case against the complainant and to

remove his name from rowdy sheeter, the petitioner

alleged to have demanded bribe from the complainant. A

trap has been laid on 23.12.2025. Out of the bait amount,

Rs.2,00,000/-, Rs.50,000/- has been recovered from the

petitioner under mahazar and Rs.1,50,000/- from Police

Inspector of the same police station which is stated have

been given by the petitioner as hand loan to him to

perform some marriage. In trap cases, major portion of

the investigation is over on the day of the trap. Therefore,

the petitioner is not required for further custodial

interrogation. The petitioner has undertaken to cooperate

with the Investigating Officer in further investigation and

NC: 2026:KHC:7878

HC-KAR

abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court.

Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has made

out case for grant of bail with conditions.

7. In the result, the following

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The petitioner is granted bail in Crime

No.62/2025 of Karnataka Lokayuktha Police,

Bengaluru City, subject to following conditions:

a) The petitioner -accused shall execute a

personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

with one surety for the likesum to the

satisfaction of the trial Court.

b) The petitioner -accused shall cooperate with

the Investigating Officer in further

investigation if any.

NC: 2026:KHC:7878

HC-KAR

c) The petitioner -accused shall not tamper the

prosecution witnesses either directly or

indirectly.

d) The petitioner -accused shall attend the trial

Court on all dates of hearing unless

exempted and co-operate for speedy

disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter