Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhananjay vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1087 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1087 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Dhananjay vs State Of Karnataka on 10 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                    -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC:7996
                                                          CRL.P No. 16800 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                                BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16800 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                              483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      DHANANJAY
                      S/O CHINNIDORAL
                      AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
                      RESIDING AT 191, AVATTI VILLAGE
                      THITTAKUDI TALUK, KADALURU
                      KARUR, TAMIL NADU-639 001
                                                                    ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. GIRISH R, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY HAL PS
                            NOW REPRESENTED BY
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA             STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                            HIGH COURT BUILDING
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                            BENGALURU-560 001

                      2.    R. PARVATI
                            C/O V. HARI
                            AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
                            R/AT. 0061, 1ST FLOOR
                            SRI SAI HOMES
                            CHINNAPPANAHALLI
                             -2-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC:7996
                                    CRL.P No. 16800 of 2025


HC-KAR




    DODDANEKUNDI
    BENGALURU-560 037
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
    SRI. VISHAK HEGDE M.S, ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI. ANGAD KAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C
(FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNNS) PRAYING TO PASS AN
ORDER GRANTING REGULAR BAIL THEREBY DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENT HAL PS TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER IN
CR.NO.274/2025 ON SPL.C 1738/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE- FTSC-
V, BENGALURU FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTION UNDER SECTION 4(2) AND 6 OF PROTECTION
OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2012 AND
64(2)(m), 127(3), 87, 65(1) OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA
SANHITHA (BNS) 2023.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by the sole accused under

Section 483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime

No.274/2025 of HAL Police Station, registered for offences

under Section 4(2), Section 6 of POCSO Act and Sections

64(2)(m), 127(3), 87, 65(1) of BNS, pending in

Spl.C.1738/2025 on the file of Additional City Civil and

Sessions Judge, FTSC-V, Bengaluru.

NC: 2026:KHC:7996

HC-KAR

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

HCGP for Respondent No.1/State and learned counsel for

respondent No.2.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that

the statement of the victim recorded by the

counsellor/apta Samalochakaru, indicate that the victim

girl is having love affair with the petitioner and she

voluntarily went with him. The victim girl is aged more

than 15 years and she is of the age of understanding the

consequences of her acts. The petitioner is in judicial

custody since 10.06.2025. As the charge sheet is filed, she

is not required for further custodial interrogation. There

are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. The victim,

her mother and the school Principal have already been

examined. With this he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that the

date of birth of victim girl is 14.10.2009 and she is aged

15 years. The statement of the victim girl has been

recorded under Section 183 of BNSS wherein she has

NC: 2026:KHC:7996

HC-KAR

stated the act of this petitioner having sexual intercourse

with her. The charge sheet material show prima-facie case

against the petitioner for the offences alleged against him.

With this he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 would

contend that the statement of the victim girl has been

recorded by the police wherein she has stated that the

petitioner had committed sexual intercourse against her

will. The victim girl having love affair is not a matter to be

considered. The petitioner is a resident of Tamil Nadu and

there is flight risk. With this, he prayed to reject the

petition.

6. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has

perused the charge sheet and other materials placed on

record.

7. The case of the prosecution as per charge sheet is

that the victim came in contact with the petitioner through

app and they exchanged mobile numbers and continued to

NC: 2026:KHC:7996

HC-KAR

have contact with each other. The petitioner, in the guise

of loving her, has induced her and secured her to Tamil

Nadu and took her to different place and stayed in a

rented house and had sexual intercourse against her will.

8. The statement of the victim girl has been

recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, wherein the victim

girl has specifically stated that she is having love affair

with the petitioner. The victim girl is aged 15 years and 8

months as on the date of incident and she is of the age of

understanding the consequences of her acts. The

petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.06.2025 and as

the charge sheet is filed, he is not required for further

custodial interrogation. There are no criminal antecedents

of the petitioner. The petitioner has undertaken to abide

by any conditions to be imposed by this Court.

9. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has

made out case for grant of bail with conditions. In the

result, the following:

NC: 2026:KHC:7996

HC-KAR

ORDER

Petition is allowed. Petitioner is granted bail in

Spl.C.No.1738/2025 (Crime No.274/2025 of HAL Police

Station), pending on the file of Additional City Civil and

Sessions Judge, FTSC-V, Bengaluru, subject to the

following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

(ii) Petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

(iii) Petitioner shall attend the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and co-operate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter