Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Jai Malhar Furniture vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1014 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1014 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The Jai Malhar Furniture vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 February, 2026

                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC-D:1821
                                                        WP No. 100787 of 2026


                       HC-KAR




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

                        DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                          BEFORE

                      THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

                       WRIT PETITION NO.100787 OF 2026 (GM-FOR)

                      BETWEEN:
                      THE JAI MALHAR FURNITURE,
                      REPRESENTED BY RAJESHWARI RAJU KADOLKAR,
                      AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
                      KULGI ROAD, TQ. DANDELI,
                      DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581325.
                      (MSTC/JAI MALHAR FURNITURE/575519)
                                                                    ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. K.H. BAGI, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
                      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                           BY ITS SECRETARY,
                           DEPARTMENT OF FOREST,
                           M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                           BENGALURU-560001.
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN KATTIMANI      2.   THE ADDL. PRINCIPAL CHIEF
Location: HIGH             CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                  ARANYA BHAVAN, 4TH CROSS,
                           MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.

                      3.   THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
                           HALIYAL DIVISION, HALIYAL,
                           DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581329.

                      4.   THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
                           YALLAPUR DIVISION, YALLAPUR,
                           DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581359.

                      5.   THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC-D:1821
                                    WP No. 100787 of 2026


HC-KAR




     GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT DANDELI,
     TQ. DENDELI, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581325.

6.   THE RANGE FOREST OFFICE,
     GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT BHAGAWATI,
     TQ. HALIYAL, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581363.

7.   THE RANGE FOREST OFFICE,
     GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT KULAGI,
     TQ. HALIYAL, DSIT. UTTAR KANNADA-581363.

8.   THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
     GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT KIRUVATTI,
     TQ. YALLAUR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581412.

9.   THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
     GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT MUNDAGOD,
     TQ. MUNDGOD, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581349.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S.HIREMATH, HCGP)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE; A) A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR
ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE SALE INTIMATION
LETTERS BEARING AUCTION NUMBER MSTC/BLR/DEPUTY
CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS HALIYAL/ACF GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT
DANDELI/23/DANDELI/25-26/58038     DATED      27.01.2026,
MSTC/BLR/DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS HALIYAL/ACF
GOVT. TIMBER DEPOT DANDELI/25/DANDELI/25-26/58048
DATED 28.01.2026, MSTC/BLR/DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF
FORESTS      HALIYAL/ACF     GOVT.     TIMBER      DEPOT
DANDELI/28/DANDELI/25-26/58079 DATED 28.01.2026 AND
MSTC/BLR/DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS HALIYAL/RANGE
FOREST    OFFICER   VIRNOLI/8/KULGI/25-26/58627    DATED
29.01.2026 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 3, 5 AND 7 IN SO
FAR AS 12% FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX IS CONCERNED AT
ANNEXURE-B, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION, IN
THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. B) SUCH OTHER WRIT OR ORDERS OR
DIRECTION MAY DEEM FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, BE ISSUED IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE.
                                     -3-
                                                  NC: 2026:KHC-D:1821
                                              WP No. 100787 of 2026


HC-KAR




    THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:       THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

                              ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed seeking the following

prayer:

"PRAYER

For the reasons stated above it is humbly prayed that after calling for the records and proceeds of the case this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue;

a) a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ or order or direction, quashing the Sale Intimation Letters bearing Auction Number MSTC/BLR/Deputy Conservator of Forests Haliyal/ACF Govt. Timber Depot Dandeli/23/Dandeli/25-26/58038 dated 27.01.2026, MSTC/BLR/Deputy Conservator of Forests Haliyal/ACF Govt. Timber Depot Dandeli/25/Dandeli/25-26/58048 dated 28.01.2026, MSTC/BLR/Deputy Conservator of Forests Haliyal/ACF Govt. Timber Depot Dandeli/28/Dandeli/25-26/58079 dated 28.01.2026 and MSTC/BLR/Deputy Conservator of Forests Haliyal/Range Forest Officer Virnoli/8/Kulgi/25-26/58627 dated 29.01.2026 issued by the Respondent No. 3, 5 and 7 in so far as 12% Forest Development Tax is concerned at Annexure-B, by allowing the above writ petition, in the ends of justice.

b) Such other writ or orders or direction may deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, be issued in the interest of justice."

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has participated in

the Public e-Tender cum auction of timber Dandelion as per the

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1821

HC-KAR

schedule 27.01.2026, 28.01.2026 and 29.01.2026. The

petitioner is successful bidder of the forest products from the

respondents in auction bids by selecting the lots as per e-bills.

The petitioner was surprised to receive sale intimation letters

mail from the respondents authorities and they have levied FDT

to an extent of 12% on the wood purchased by the petitioner is

erroneous and contrary to the law.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

that levying FDT at 12% on purchase of wood is contrary to law

declared by this Court in WP.No.43937/2016 reported in 2017

(4) AKR 738.

4. The Division Bench of this Court by order dated

04.10.2017 in the case of Sri B. Rudragouda Vs. State of

Karnataka and others1 held that Section 98A of the Karnataka

Forest Act, 1963 is unconstitutional and has struck down the

same. The State had challenged the said order before the

Hon'ble Apex Court. The Hon'ble Apex Court has only stayed the

High Court Order dated 14.10.2017 insofar as refund is

AIR 2018 KAR 19

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1821

HC-KAR

concerned. It is submitted that in the light of the above, there

shall be a direction not to levy and there may be direction as

prayed for.

5. Learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for

respondents submits that the Hon'ble Apex Court had stayed the

refund of the Forest Development Tax collected from the

petitioner. Further, he does not dispute the fact that several

petitions are disposed of.

6. Having heard the learned counsels on either side,

perused the material on record. The prayer of the petitioner

seeking to quash the sale intimation letter as far as imposition of

FDT is concerned, in view of the appeal filed by the Government,

the petitioner is not entitled for any relief. As far as demanding

and collecting the Forest Development Tax in respect of the

timber and other forest produces, auctions held by the Forest

Department and the Government, timber depots across the State

of Karnataka are concerned, holding demand, collection and

refund of the Forest Development Tax would be subject to the

final outcome of W.A.No.743/2021 and connected matter

pending before this Court and Civil Appeal Nos.3974 to 4068 of

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1821

HC-KAR

2016 and Civil Appeal Nos.3214 to 3271 of 2018 pending before

the Hon'ble Apex Court. Accordingly, this Court is passing the

following:

ORDER

i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

ii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.

Sd/-

JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

MEG CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter