Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2837 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:17726
WP No. 11962 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 11962 OF 2025 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1. M/S RAJU ENTERPRISES
R/AT FLAT NO. 108, TAMAKA,
INDUSTRIAL AREA,
BETHAMANGALA ROAD,
KOLAR 563 101.
REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
SRI. S. N. RAJU.
2. SRI. S. N. RAJU,
S/O SOMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
3. SMT. SUJATHAMMA,
W/O S. N. RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T 4. SRI. RAKESH RAJ H R,
Location:
HIGH COURT
S/O S. N. RAJU,
OF
KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
5. SMT. RAMYA H R,
D/O S.N. RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT NO.12,
7TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR,
TEKAL ROAD,
KOLAR - 563 101.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H. SURESH, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3
SRI. M.S.JASWANTH, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONERS NO.4 & 5)
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:17726
WP No. 11962 of 2025
HC-KAR
AND:
SIR M VISVESVARAYA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
CORPORATE OFFICE NO. 109,
SHANKARMUTT ROAD,
SHANKARAPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 004.
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
...RESPONDENT
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SALE
NOTICE DATED. 04.04.2025 BEARING REF.NO.
VCB/CO/VJN/SN/15/2025-26 ISSUED BY THE AUTHORIZED
OFFICER OF THE RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND
ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following
prayers:
"a. Issue an Order, Direction of Writ in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI, Quashing the sale notice dt.04-04-2025 bearing ref. No. VCB/CO/VJN/SN/15/2025-26, issued by The Authorized Officer of the respondent Bank vide ANNEXURE-M.
b. Pass any other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to pass in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."
;
NC: 2026:KHC:17726
HC-KAR
2. A memo is filed stating that, in the light of the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Central Bank of
India vs. Prabha Jain1, the petitioners may be permitted to
withdraw writ petition, with a liberty to approach the
jurisdictional Court for redressal of their grievance relating to
breach of contract, substitution and misrepresentation by the
respondent.
3. The memo is taken on record.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn, with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.
i. The petitioners shall have the benefit of
Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
ii. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/-
(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
2025 INSC 95
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!