Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8359 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:36408
RFA No. 2123 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2123 OF 2025 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
G.B. RUKMANGADA
S/O BASAVARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT GANGANAGHATTA VILLAGE,
NONAVINAKERE HOBLI,
TIPTUR TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572201.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI PRASANNA D.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PRABHAMANI
D/O BASAVARAJU,
W/O M.S.MOHAN KUMAR,
Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
MAHALAKSHMI B M R/O. G. MALLENAHALLY VILLAGE,
Location: HIGH NONAVINAKERE HOBLI,
COURT OF TIPTUR TALUK-572201
KARNATAKA TUMKUR DISTRICT.
2. BASAVARAJA
S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
R/AT GANGANAGHATTA VILLAGE,
NONAVINAKERE HOBLI,
TIPTUR TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572201.
3. G.B. PUSHPAVATHI
D/O BASAVARAJU,
W/O JANARDHANA,
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:36408
RFA No. 2123 of 2025
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT NERALAKERE VILLAGE,
NUGGEHALLI HOBLI,
CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573116.
4. G.B. SHARAVATHI
D/O BASAVARAJU
W/O DORESWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT DASARIGHATTA VILLAGE,
NONAVINAKERE HOBLI,
TIPTUR TALUK-572201
TUMKUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.06.2025 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.95/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, TIPTUR, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT
WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant files memo, which
reads as under:
"The Appellant above named pray that, this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file on appeal before the District Court/Jurisdictional Court, Since the above appeal is not maintainable before this Hon'ble Court, hence kindly extend the limitation
NC: 2025:KHC:36408
HC-KAR
benefits and direct the office to return the certified copies, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of memo, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to seek
exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act,
1963 in accordance with law.
Registry to return back the certified copies.
Sd/-
_____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
AT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!