Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tanuja A Bhandari vs The Director
2025 Latest Caselaw 10683 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10683 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Tanuja A Bhandari vs The Director on 26 November, 2025

Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M.Nagaprasanna
                                                  -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:16427
                                                          WP No. 104311 of 2025


                       HC-KAR



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                                DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
                                                 BEFORE
                                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                                WRIT PETITION NO. 104311 OF 2025 (S-REG)


                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   TANUJA A. BHANDARI
                           W/O. SUBHAS BHAT,
                           AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
                           SECODN DIVISION ASSISTANT,
                           TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
                           KUMTA-581343
                           UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

                      2.   LAXMINARAYANA K. HEGDE
                           S/O. KRISHNA L. HEGDE
                           AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
                           TAX BILL COLLECTOR,
                           TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
                           KUMTA-581343
                           UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

                      3.   RAMA M. NAIK
                           S/O. MADHAV NAIK,
Digitally signed by        AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RAKESH S
HARIHAR                    TAX SECTION BILL COLLECTOR,
Location: High
Court of Karnataka,        TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
Dharwad Bench,
Dharwad                    KUMTA -581343
                           UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

                      4.   FRANCIS MANTU FERNADIS
                           S/O. MANTU FERNANDIS,
                           AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
                           WATER SUPPLY VALVEMAN,
                           TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
                           KUMTA - 581343
                           UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

                      5.   NAGARAJ J. NAIK
                           S/O. JATTAPPA NAIK,
                             -2-
                                     NC: 2025:KHC-D:16427
                                   WP No. 104311 of 2025


 HC-KAR



     AGED ABOUT 42YEARS,
     WATER UPPLY PUMP OPERATOR,
     TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
     KUMTA - 581343
     UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

6.   SHAKUNTALA G. DESHBHANDARI,
     W/O. CHANDRAKANT BHANDARI,
     AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
     SECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT,
     TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
     KUMTA - 581343
     UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

7.   SANTOSH T. NAIK
     S/O. THIMMAPPA NAIK,
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
     SECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT
     (BUILDING PERMISSION CASE WORKER)
     TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
     KUMTA - 581343
     UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

8.   MANJUNATH S. NAIK
     S/O. SURESH V. NAIK
     AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
     TAX SECTION BILL COLLECTOR,
     TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
     KUMTA - 581343
     UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

9.   PRAKASH H. GAWADI
     S/O. HERAMBA GAWADI
     AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
     WATER SUPPLU VALVEMAN
     TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
     KUMTA - 581343
     UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

10. SANTOSH P. NAIK
    S/O. PANDURANGA NAIK,
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
    WATER SUPPLY PUMP OPERATOR,
    TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
                               -3-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC-D:16427
                                      WP No. 104311 of 2025


 HC-KAR



      KUMTA - 581343
      UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.
                                                   ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MURALIDHAR K B, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
      9TH FLOOR, ISHVESHWARAIAH TOWERS,
      BENGALURU 560001.

2.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
      UTTAR KANNADA DIST. 581301
                                                  ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO,

     I) ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO
          CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS
          DATED 23.05.2024 AND 03.02.2025 (ANNEXURE-H AND J)
          FOR REGULARIZATION OF THEIR SERVICES WITH EFFECT
          FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF 10 YEARS OF DAILY
          WAGE SERVICE, WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL SERVICE AND
          FINANCIAL BENEFITS AS DONE IN THE CASE OF SIMILARLY
          SITUATED 330 DAILY WAGE GROUP-D EMPLOYEES VIDE
          ORDER          BEARING          NO.JI.NA.KO/SIBBANDI/
          BEM.NAGARA/CR/80/2021-22 DATED 16.04.2022 PASSED BY
          THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
          (ANNEXURE-D) AND ETC.
     II) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER/ORDERS AS THIS HON BLE COURT
          DEEMS FIT AND JUST IN THE MATTER IN THE INTEREST OF
          JUSTICE AND EQUITY IN THE EYE OF LAW.
    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B
GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                    -4-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC-D:16427
                                              WP No. 104311 of 2025


HC-KAR




                              ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following

prayer.

"i) Issue WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the Respondents to consider the Representations of the Petitioners dated 23.05.2024 and 03.02.2025 (ANNEXURE-H AND J) for regularization of their services with effect from the date of completion of 10 years of daily wage service, with all consequential service and financial benefits as done in the case of similarly situated 330 daily wage Group-D employees vide order bearing No.Ji.Na.Ko/Sibbandi/Bem.Nagara/ CR/80/2021-22 dated 16.04.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District (ANNEXURE-D), and as done in the case of similarly situated 70 daily wage Group-C employees vide order bearing No.25260 DMA 26 DWE/2018-19 dated 20.05.2023 passed by the 2nd Respondent (ANNEXURE-E) and as done vide Government Order bearing No.Na.Aa.E 33 BBM 2023 (E) dated 18.12.2023 passed by the 1st Respondent (ANNEXURE-F) and as done in the case of similarly situated 15 daily wage Group-D employees vide order bearing No.Chaa.Ji.Na.Ko/ Sibbandi/CR/426/2018-19 dated 07.02.2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Chamarajanagara District (ANNEXURE-G) on the ground of parity and in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of SHRIPAL AND ANOTHER (ANNEXURE-K) in the interest of justice and equity.

ii) Pass such other Order/orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and just in the matter in the interest of justice and equity in the eye of law."

NC: 2025:KHC-D:16427

HC-KAR

2. Heard the learned counsel Sri. Muralidhar K.B. and

the learned HCGP for the respondents.

3. The petitioners are said to have been appointed

between the years 1998 to 2001 as Group 'C' or 'D' employees in

Town Municipal Council, Kumta, Uttara Kannada. It is the claim

of the petitioners that they have been working for the last 23 to

27 years and are entitled to be considered for regularisation of

their services. The representations having gone unheeded, the

petitioners are before this Court in the subject petition, quoting

several illustrations of either the pourakarmikas of the BBMP or

other departments to buttress the submission with regard to the

claim or entitlement for regularisation.

4. The learned HCGP submits that if reasonable time is

granted, the representations of these petitioners would merit

consideration in accordance with law and appropriate orders

would be passed thereon.

5. In the light of the said submission without going into

the merit of the claim of these petitioners, I deem it appropriate

to dispose of the subject petition with a direction to the

NC: 2025:KHC-D:16427

HC-KAR

respondent - State to consider the cases of these petitioners

strictly in consonance with law bearing in mind the law declared

by the Apex Court as followed by this Court from time to time

qua the cases of regularisation and pass necessary orders

thereon in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from

the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

Rsh / CT:ANB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter