Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10489 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15962
MFA No. 101491 of 2015
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101491 OF 2015 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI. VISHWANATH SADASHIV TANGADI,
AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: GOUNDI,
R/O: CHIKKATTI, TQ: ATHANI,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. ARCHANA A. MAGADUM, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. BHUPAL RAYAPPA MORAB
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: MAHISHWADAGI,
TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
GIRIJA A. 2. SRI. NINGAPPA DHAREPPA HIPPARAGI
BYAHATTI
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
Digitally signed by
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI
Location: HIGH COURT
R/O: MAHISHWADAGI,
OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DHARWAD TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
KATAGI BUILDING,
1ST FLOOR, KACHERI ROAD,
JAMKHANDI-587301.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.S. JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
NOTICE TO R1 & R2 SERVED)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15962
MFA No. 101491 of 2015
HC-KAR
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MVC ACT
PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY
THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR
ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ATHANI IN MVC NO.135/2013
DATED 02.07.2014 AND AWARD THE COMPENSATION AS
PRAYED FOR IN THE CLAIM PETITION, BY ALLOWING THIS
APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON DISMISSAL
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
No representation on appellant's side on call.
2. On 12.11.2025, following order was passed:
"No representation on appellant's side on call.
Sri S.S.Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.3 is present.
On 08.10.2025 learned counsel for the appellant sought time and accordingly time was granted. However, on this day there is no representation.
Therefore list the matter on 20.11.2025 under the caption 'for dismissal'."
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15962
HC-KAR
3. The appellant did not choose to represent the
matter even on passing the aforementioned order.
Therefore, it is clear that the appellant is not interested in
pursuing the appeal. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
RH CT-MCK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!