Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri G Ramaiah vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 10488 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10488 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri G Ramaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 November, 2025

                                                -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:48127
                                                        WP No. 3534 of 2020


                   HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                               BEFORE

                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 3534 OF 2020 (KLR-RES)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SRI G RAMAIAH
                         SINCE DEAD BY LR'S.

                         1(a) CHIKKABYRAMMA
                         W/O LATE G. RAMAIAH
                         AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

                         1(b) SRI. R. GOVINDARAJU
                         S/O LATE G RAMAIAH
                         AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

                         BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
                         NO.205, MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
                         NEAR SHREE SAI VRUDDASHRAMA
Digitally signed         METIPALYA, TAVAREKERE
by PANKAJA S
                         BANGALORE-562 130
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                1(c) SRI. R. PRAJWAL @ R LAKSHMANA MURTHY S
                         R/AT NO.110, 2ND CROSS
                         SHASHIDHARA LAYOUT, CHANNASANDRA
                         RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,
                         BANGALORE-560 098.
                                                                ...PETITIONER

                   (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR SWAMY K.B, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                           -2-
                                     NC: 2025:KHC:48127
                                    WP No. 3534 of 2020


HC-KAR




     REVENUE DEPARTMENT
     REP BY ITS SECRETARY
     M.S. BUILDING
     DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
     BANGALORE-560 001.

2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
     BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT
     BANGALORE-560 009

3.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
     BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVSIION
     BANGALORE-560 009

4.   THE TAHASILDAR
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK
     KANDAYA BHAVAN
     K G ROAD,
     BANGALORE-560 009

5.   THE LAND GRANTS COMMITTEE
     BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK
     BANGALORE-560 009
                                        ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1-R5)

     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS AND PARTICULARLY THE R-4 TO CONSIDER
THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-M
DATED 09.12.2019 AND DIRECT THE R-4 TO EFFECT THE
KATHA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.08.2003 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.750/2002 BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE
(JUNIOR   DIVISION),  BANGALORE    RURAL    DISTRICT,
BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-D DATED 07.08.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                -3-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC:48127
                                          WP No. 3534 of 2020


HC-KAR




CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                         ORAL ORDER

The petitioner, in this writ petition, sought a writ of

mandamus directing respondent No.4 - Tahsildar, Bangalore

South Taluk to consider the representation of the petitioner

dated 09.12.2019 at Annexure-'M' and to effect khata in

respect of property bearing Sy.No.11 measuring 2 acres

situated at Pattanagere Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South

Taluk (for brevity, 'subject land') based on the judgment and

decree dated 07.08.2003 passed in O.S.No.750/2002 by the II

Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Bangalore Rural District vide

Annexure-'D'.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has filed a

suit in O.S.No.750/2002 against respondent Nos.1 and 4 i.e.,

Revenue Department and the Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk

for declaration and consequential injunction in respect of

subject. According to the petitioner, the said suit was decreed

vide judgment and decree dated 07.08.2003. Thereafter, the

petitioner has filed an application before respondent No.4 -

Tahsildar for change of khata of the said land. However,

NC: 2025:KHC:48127

HC-KAR

respondent No.4 has failed to consider the representation of

the petitioner till today, though the same was filed on

09.12.2019. In such circumstance, I am of the considered view

that the prayer made in the petition requires to be granted.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

Respondent No.4 - Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, is

directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

09.12.2019 in accordance with law within an outer limit of four

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

SD/-

(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter