Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10486 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:47918
RSA No. 1087 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1087 OF 2023 (PAR/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA,
D/O LATE B. BYRALINGAIAH,
W/O S.G. RAJASHEKARAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDING AT SREENIVASAPURA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
NELAMANGAL TALUK-562123.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed 1. SMT. SAROJAMMA,
by DEVIKA M D/O LATE B. BYRALINGAIAH,
Location: HIGH W/O LATE VIJAYANNA,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BYRASANDRA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MADALAKOTE POST,
NELAMANGALA TALUK-562123.
2. SMT. MAHALAKSHMAMMA,
D/O LATE B. BYRALINGAIAH,
W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR,
AGEDA BOUT 71 YEARS,
RESIDING AT MALLARABANAVADI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:47918
RSA No. 1087 of 2023
HC-KAR
3. SRI. B.H. MUNIRAJU,
S/O HANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI HEGDE SHRIPAD GANGADHAR, ADVOCATE
FOR R1 AND R2;
R3 - SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.03.2023
PASSED IN R.A.NO.7/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA,
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 12.03.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.136/2008
ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
NELAMANGALA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
stating that the parties to the above appeal have settled the
matter by effecting partition of the subject properties on
27.01.2025 and the same is registered in the office of the Sub-
Registrar, Nelamangala on 28.01.2025. The copy of the
partition deed is also produced before the Court and hence,
NC: 2025:KHC:47918
HC-KAR
prayed this Court to dispose of the appeal taking the same on
record.
2. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2
also not disputes the same and they are also parties to the
partition.
3. The respondent No.3 is the purchaser and both the
learned counsel submits that the property, which was
purchased by respondent No.3 is not touched in the partition.
Hence, the memo is taken on record and the second appeal is
disposed of in terms of the memo.
Sd/-
(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!