Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10473 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 108272 OF 2025 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SANJIV S/O. GANU NAIK
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ALAGERI.
R/O: ALAGERI VILLAGE,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
2. AMBIKA W/O: RAJENDRA BHAT,
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KYADAGI.
R/O: HIREKAI, KYADAGI
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
3. SUMATI D/O: SHANKAR MOGER
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SOVINKOPPA.
R/O: MULEPAL, SOVINKOPPA
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
4. SHAKUNTALA D/O: NAGA NAIK
AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
Digitally signed by G.P. LIBRARY, MANMANE
RAKESH S
HARIHAR R/O: MANMANE,
Location: High
Court of Karnataka, TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
Dharwad Bench,
Dharwad
5. GEETA W/O: VASANT PAI
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HULEKAL.
R/O: HULEKAL
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
6. GEETA W/O: VINAYAK HEGDE
AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SHIVALLI (HEGDEKATTA).
R/O: HEGDEKATTA
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
7. SAROJA W/O: MAHESH NAIK
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KANGOD.
R/O: KANGOD
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
8. KAMALAXI W/O: PRASHANT NAIK
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HARSIKATTA.
R/O: HARSIKATTA
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
9. GEETA W/O: RAMAKANT BHAT
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HEROOR.
R/O: HEROOR, TQ: SIDDAPURA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
10. KAMAKSHI W/O: HALAPPA CHALAVADI
AGE: 50 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, NILAKUND.
R/O: NILAKUND
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
11. SURESH S/O. MAILA NAIK
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BEDKANI.
R/O: BEDKANI
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
12. GAJANAN S/O. NARAYANA NAIK
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, DODMANE.
R/O: MADLAMANE, VANDANE
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
13. NETRAVATI W/O: KOTRAPPA NAIK
AGE: 55 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BIDRAKAN.
R/O: BIDRAKANE
TQ: SIDDAPURA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
14. SUNANDA W/O: RAGHUPATI NAIK
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, DODNALLI.
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
R/O: DODNALLI
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
15. LALITA W/O: CHANDRAKANTH UPPIN
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ISLOOR.
R/O: ISLOOR, TQ: SIRSI,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
16. NAGARATNA W/O: MOHAN CHANDAN
AGE: 39 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SUGAVI.
R/O: SUGAVI, TQ: SIRSI,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
17. GANGADHAR S/O. B TALAWAR
AGE: 39 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SALGAOW.
R/O: SALGAOW, CHIGALLI
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
18. MAHADEV S/O. K. NIMBAYI
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, CHIGALLI.
R/O: CHIGALLI
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
19. TARAKESHWAR S/O. V. NAIK
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BEDASGAON.
R/O: BEDASGAON
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
20. PIRAPPA S/O. C. KURIYAVAR
AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, CHOUDALLI.
R/O: CHOUDALLI,
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
21. VIJAYA D/O: PANDURANG SHET
AGE: 41 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MALAGI.
R/O: MALAGI
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
22. YALLAPPA S/O. RAMANNA SIGANALLI
SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LR
AISHWARYA D/O: YALLAPPA SIGNALLI
R/O: CHOUDALLI
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
23. SHANTALA D/O: MANJUNATH NAIK
AGE: 32 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KANGOD.
R/O: KANGOD, TQ: SIRSI,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
24. SAMPRITA W/O: GANAPATI GOUDA
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HUNSEKOPPA.
R/O: HUNASEKOPPA
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
25. SHOBA D/O: MANJUNATH GOUDA
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, YADALLI.
R/O: YADALLI,
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
26. RAJESHWARI W/O:RAGHU NAIK
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BANKANAL.
R/O: KORLAKATTA
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
27. JAGADAMBA D/O: K. PONNAPPA
AGE: 53 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BANAVASI.
R/O: BANAVASI,
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
28. GEETA D/O: NAGESH NAIK
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SALKANI.
R/O: SALKANI
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
29. SUJATA D/O: GANAPATI NAIK
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
G.P. LIBRARY, BAIRUMBE.
R/O: AGASALI, BOMMANAHALLI,
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
30. KUSUMAVATI D/O: MANJUNATH BANDARI
AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KODANGADDE.
R/O: KODANAGADDE
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
31. RAJU S/O. SHIVAPPA NAIK
AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, GUDNAPURA.
R/O: GUDNAPURA
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
32. MADHUKESHWAR S/O. DAKAPPA NAIK
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BHASHI.
R/O: BHASHI, BANAVASI
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
33. CHANDRA S/O. S. MADAR
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ANDAGI.
R/O: ANDAGI
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
34. PARASHURAM S/O. M. SAKANNANAVAR
AGE: 36 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BADANGOD.
R/O: DASANKOPPA,
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
35. DHANANJAY S/O. R HEGDE
AGE: 56 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, NEGGU.
R/O: NEGGU,
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
36. VINAYAK S/O. NARAYAN MUKRI
AGE: 39 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HASARGOD.
R/O: HOSAGEDDE, HASARAGOD
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
TQ: SIDDAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
37. NAGARAJ S/O. RAMA GOUDA
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BANDALA.
R/O: AIGINAMANE, KURSI
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
38. RAMANAGOUDA S/O. BASANGOUDA KADANNANAVAR
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KATUR.
R/O: KATUR,
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
39. GANAPATI S/O. RAMA NAIK
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ITAGULI.
R/O: NEERNALLI, ITAGULI
TQ: SIRSI DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
40. DILIP S/O. HARIKRISHNA NAIK
AGE: 57 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ULGA.
R/O: ULGA,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
41. MANOJKUMAR S/O. NARAYAN NAIK
AGE: 36 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MALLAPUR.
R/O: MALLAPUR,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
42. SUREKHA D/O: ARJUN NAIK
AGE: 53 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KADRAPETE.
R/O: KADRA
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
43. GOYDA S/O. KRISHNA GOUDA
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KARWA.
R/O: KARWA,
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
44. SHRIKANT S/O. BUDUK GURAV
-7-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
AGE: 55 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KINNAR.
R/O: KARWA,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
45. MAHANANDA D/O: GURUNATH GAONKAR
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SIDDAR.
R/O: SIDDAR,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
46. MANDA D/O: SURESH NAIK
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HALAGA.
R/O: HALAGA
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
47. VANITA D/O: BABU NAIK
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, DEVBAGH.
R/O: DEVBAGH,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
48. VIJAYA D/O: SHANTARAM NAIK
AGE: 50 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MAJALI.
R/O: MAJALI,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
49. RAJESH S/O. DEVENDRA SAWANT
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ASNOTI.
R/O: SAWANTWADA,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
50. DIVYA W/O: SUNIL MAJALIKAR
AGE: 39 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MAKKERI.
R/O: MAKKERI,
TQ: KARWAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
51. CHANDRAKALA D/O: RAMA GOUDA
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HARAWADA.
-8-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
R/O: HARWADA,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
52. MANJULA D/O: MASTI MUKRI
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MOGWA.
R/O:KAREBAIL, ANDLE,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
53. SHARADA D/O: GOVIND GOUDA
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BELASE.
R/O: BELSE,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
54. UMA D/O: NAGAPPA NAIK
AGE: 36 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, DONGRI.
R/O: DONGRI, KALLESHWAR
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
55. SHANKARI D/O: GOVIND NAIK
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HATTIKERI.
R/O: SAKALABENA, HATTIKERI
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
56. SUMANA D/O: MAHADEV NAIK
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BOBRAVADA.
R/O: BOBRAVADA
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
57. BABI D/O: RAMA NAYAK
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SAGADGERI.
R/O: SAGADGERI,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
58. DINESH S/O. RUVA NAIK
AGE: 44 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BHAVIKERI.
R/O: BHAVIKERI,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
-9-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
59. DEEPALI D/O: KASHINATH SHET
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, AGRAGONE.
R/O: AGRAGONE,
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
60. GOPALKRISHNA S/O. NARAYAN BHAT
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KALACHE.
R/O: KALACHE, PO: KALACHE
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
61. DASHARATH S/O. MADEVAPPA DHUNDASHI
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, INDOOR.
R/O: INDOOR, PO: INDOOR
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
62. BASAVANANDA S/O. RAMCHANDRAPPA BUDDANNANAVAR
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HUNGUND.
R/O: HUNGUND, PO: HUNGUND
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
63. RACHAPPA S/O. RUDRAPPA KONDIKOPPA
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BACHANAKI.
R/O: BACHANAKI, PO: BACHANAKI
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
64. SMITA D/O: VITHAL JADHAV
AGE: 30 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KODAMBI.
R/O: KODAMBI, PO: PALA
TQ: MUNDGOD DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
65. SHEELA W/O: HASABANNA NAYAK
AGE: 55 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SHETGERI.
R/O: SHILYA, PO: BASKOD
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
66. NAGENDRA S/O. PANDURANG NAIK
SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LR
- 10 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
SMT. NAMITA W/O: NAGENDRA NAIK
R/O: HARWADA, PO: HARWADA
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
67. MANJUNATHA S/O. MUNNA HASLAR
AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MANKI.
R/O: BOLEBASTI, PO: TALAMAKKI(MANKI)
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
68. NAGARAJ S/O. SUBRAYA SHETTY
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MUGVA.
R/O: SURAKATTE, PO: MUGVA
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
69. MAHADEVI D/O: MASTI MUKRI
AGE: 41 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, CHANDAVAR.
R/O: CHANDAVAR, PO: CHANDAVAR
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
70. VASANT S/O. GANAPATI NAIK
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MELIN IDAGUNJI.
R/O: BALUBELE, PO: KELAGIN IDAGUNJI
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
71. MOHAN S/O. RAMACHANDRA NAIK
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HIREBAIL.
R/O: NERALAMAKKI, PO: MUTTA
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
72. GOPAL S/O. HANMANT NAIK
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, JALAVALLI.
R/O: NELLIGADDE, PO: JALAVALLI
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
73. CHANDU S/O. NARAYAN NAIK
AGE: 49 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, NAGARBASTIKERI.
R/O: ANEGADDE, PO: GERASOPPA
- 11 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
TQ: HONNAVAR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
74. MANJU S/O. MANJU GOUDA
AGE: 57 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KELAGINUR.
R/O:HOLLAKULI, PO: KELAGINUR
TQ: HONNAVAR: UTTARA KANNADA
75. SURESH S/O. MANJUNATH NAIK
AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MUNDALLI.
R/O: MUNDALLI, PO: MUNDALLI
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
76. GOIDA S/O. JUTA NAIK
AGE: 50 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BENGRE.
R/O: MUDSHIRALI, PO: BENGRE
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
77. ANASUYA D/O: MASTAPPA NAIK
AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, YALVADKAVUR.
R/O: SHIRALI, PO: SHIRALI
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
78. MANGALA D/O: NARAYAN NAIK
AGE: 30 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, SHIRALI.
R/O: SHIRALI, PO: SHIRALI
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
79. SUSHEELA D/O: VENKAPPA NAIK
AGE: 35 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MUTALLI.
R/O: MUTALLI, PO: MUTALLI
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
80. LAXMI D/O: SUKRA GOUD
AGE: 36 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MARUKERI.
R/O: MARUKERI, PO: MARUKERI
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
81. REVATI D/O: ANNAPPA MOGER
- 12 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
AGE: 34 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BELKE.
R/O: BELKE, PO: BELKE
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
82. NARAYAN S/O. MANGAL GOND
AGE: 41 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KONAR.
R/O: BEELURMANE, PO: KONAR
TQ: BHATKAL DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
83. DATTATREYA S/O. TIMMANNA BHAT
AGE: 42 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, VAJRALLI.
R/O: KANNIPAL, PO: VAJRALLI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
84. RITA D/O: RAGHUNATH ROKHADE
AGE: 44 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KUNDARGI.
R/O: BHARATANALLI, PO: KUNDARGI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
85. NAGARATNA D/O:LAXMAN ACHARI
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KOSAGULI.
R/O: KONDOORU, PO: HASANAGI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
86. GANAPATI S/O. TIMMAPPA NAIK
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, ANGOD.
R/O: ANGOD, PO: ANGOD
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
87. SHAILA D/O: RAMA DESHBHANDARI
AGE: 55 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, HITLALLI.
R/O: HITLALLI, PO: HITLALLI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
88. NALINI D/O: DEVENDRA GUNDUPAKAR
AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MADANURU.
- 13 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
R/O: HATHIBHVIGALLI,
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
89. SAVITRI D/O: CHANDRASHEKAR BHAT
AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, MAVINMANE.
R/O: MAVINMANE, PO: MAVINMANE
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
90. KAVITA W/O: KUPPAYYA POOJARI
AGE: 41YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, UMMACHAGI.
R/O: UMMACHAGI, PO: UMMACHAGI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
91. SHRIPAD S/O. KRISHNA GAONKAR
AGE: 54 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, IDAGUNDI.
R/O: IDAGUNDI, PO: IDAGUNDI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
92. DAYANANDA S/O. RAMACHANDRA SHET
AGE: 51YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, KAMPLI.
R/O: MANCHIKERI, PO: MANCHIKERI
TQ: YALLAPUR DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
93. JAYA S/O. SANNU JAMBAVALIKAR
AGE: 52 YEARS OCC: LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
G.P. LIBRARY, BELEKERI.
R/O: KHARVIVADA, PO: BELEKERI
TQ: ANKOLA DIST: UTTARA KANNADA
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ANDPANCHAYAT RAJ, 3RD FLOOR,
MS BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU. 560 001
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND
- 14 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
BY DESIGNATION DEPARTMENT OF
RURAL DEVELOPMENT ANDPANCHAYAT RAJ,
3RD FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3. THE COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
AND PANCHAYAT RAJ,
BENGALURU. 560 001.
4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTITUTION
AND PRIMARY EDUCATION,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LIBRARY,
CUBBON PARK, BENGALURU - 560 001.
6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DISTRICT CENTRAL LIBRARY KARWAR,
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT - 581 301.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT/STATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR A
DIRECTION OR AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO MAKE PAYMENT OF
6 MONTHS MINIMUM WAGES DIFFERENCE AMOUNT TO THE PRESENT
PETITIONERS AS PER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.10.2025 VIDE
ANNEXURE-S TO THE WRIT PETITION. ISSUE A WRIT OR A DIRECTION
OR AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY A SUM OF RS. 20,000/- TO
THE PETITIONERS AS COST OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 15 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
WP No. 108272 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the
following prayer:
A. Issue a Writ or a direction or an appropriate order in the nature of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to make payment of 6 months minimum wages difference amount to the present petitioners as per the representation dated 08.10.2025 vide Annexure- S to the writ petition.
B. Issue a Writ or a direction or an appropriate order in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 20,000/- to the Petitioners as cost of the proceedings.
C. Issue any other order or directions and grant such other reliefs this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The petitioners are similarly placed to the petitioner
in Writ Petition No.106282 of 2024. This Court considering the
orders that are passed by the Co-ordinate Benches had quashed
the endorsement and directed payment of difference of minimum
wages. The order of this Court reads as follows:
"3. Facts in brief, germane are as follows:
The petitioner is appointed as a Library Supervisor in Unchalli Gram Panchayat and has rendered more than 30 years of service as on date. The State Government issued a communication to the respondent No.3 clarifying that Library Supervisors are considered as skilled labourers and therefore would become eligible for payment of minimum
- 16 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
wages in terms of the Schedule of minimum wages issued by the State Government from time to time. The Minimum Wages Authority, Kalaburgi, passes an order directing the respondent to make payment of difference of six months in minimum wages to Library Supervisors working in Jevargi Taluka, Kalaburgi District.
4. This is said to have been challenged by the State before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburgi Bench, Kalaburgi, in Writ Petition No.20264/2015. The Writ Petition comes to be dismissed. It is later, the State Government is said to have passed an order making payment of six months of difference to the Library Supervisors working at Kalaburgi. The petitioner then submits a representation seeking the same relief and nonconsideration of the representation, led the petitioner to this Court in Writ Petition No.100575/2021, in which, the petitioner along with others. The said Writ Petition comes to be allowed by the following order:
"5. It is not in dispute that the petitioners have been working as Library Supervisor in various Gram Panchayats of Uttara Kannada District for more than twenty years. The Labour Court at Kalaburagi has held that the Assistant Supervisors working in various Gram Pachayat in Kalaburagi District are entitled for payment of six months difference amount of minimum wages. It is also not in dispute that petitioners are also working on par with other government servants as per Annexure-D. The government by its order dated 9.8.2010 vide Annexure-D has held that the Library Supervisors are entitled for enhancement of honorarium on par with other government servants. Hence, it is incumbent on the part of respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 25.11.2020 vide Annexures-J to J59 and pass appropriate order. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed of directing respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representations dated 25.11.2020 at Annexures-J to J59 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order."
5. A direction was issued to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass necessary orders in accordance with law. This resulted in an endorsement dated 08.10.2021. The said endorsement is called in question by
- 17 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
the present petitioner in Writ Petition No.100630/2022. The Co-ordinate Bench disposes the said petition by the following observations:
"6. The material on record would go to show that the last notification that was issued by the State Government extending the benefits of payment of minimum wages even to the library supervisors working in Gram Panchayat Libraries and Zilla Panchayat Libraries was on 05.08.2016. The petitioner has submitted his representation seeking payment of difference amount on the ground that the minimum wages fixed by the State Government was not paid to him. The said representation was made on 19.11.2020, by then the notification dated 05.08.2016 was already withdrawn by the State Government vide notification dated 04.09.2017. The correctness of issuing of notification dated 04.09.2017 had fallen for consideration before this Court in WP No.22420/2017 which was disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 24.04.2022. In the said writ petition, the Coordinate Bench of this Court has quashed the notification dated 04.09.2017 issued by the State Government withdrawing its earlier final notification dated 05.08.2016, on the ground that the notification dated 04.09.2017 was issued without proper and valid reasons as required in law. However, liberty was reserved in favour of the respondents to issue/ pass appropriate orders/directions/notification etc., in accordance with law. Since the notification dated 04.09.2017 issued by the State Government withdrawing its earlier final notification dated 05.08.2016 has been quashed by this Court in WP No.22420/2017, the impugned endorsement Annexure-L which has been issued by the State Government placing reliance on its notification dated 04.09.2017, cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the following:
ORDER
Writ petition is partly allowed.
- 18 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
The impugned endorsement at Annexure-L dated 08.10.2021 issued by the 1st respondent is quashed and the respondent Nos.1 and 2/Competent Authority are directed to reconsider the representation of the petitioner afresh in the light of the orders passed by this Court in WP No.100575/2021 disposed of on 15.03.2021 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law expeditiously, but not later than a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. A direction was issued to respondent No.2 to reconsider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the order passed in the afore-quoted Writ Petition and necessary orders to be passed within three months. What comes about is the impugned endorsement dated 06.08.2024, which is in verbatim similar to the endorsement that was earlier quashed in Writ Petition No.100630/2022.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly situated to the Library Supervisor, who is granted the same benefit in Jevaragi Taluk, Kalaburgi District. The petitioner has been discriminated by the State in making the benefit applicable from prospective date. Learned counsel submits the notification aforesaid issued in the year 2011 comes to be withdrawn by the State. The withdrawal was challenged and the withdrawal of the said notification is quashed. Therefore, what would prevail now is 2011 notification. In terms of which, the petitioner is entitled to minimum wages from the date of the notification. Learned counsel would submit that the State could not have denied payment of the petitioner like the payments made in Kalaburgi District.
8. Per contra, learned AGA would submit that the endorsement so issued is in tune with law. Therefore it should not merit any interference at the hands of this Court.
9. The afore-narrated facts are not in dispute. The orders quoted hereinabove have resulted in the impugned endorsement. A perusal at the
- 19 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
endorsement that stood quashed by an order of this Court i.e., dated 08.10.2021, in juxtaposition with the impugned endorsement dated 06.08.2024 would unmistakably indicate that they are verbatim similar. The same defence is now but up to deny the petitioner the difference of minimum wages between 21.02.2011 and 21.08.2011 for a period of six months.
10. It is necessary to notice that the State had challenged the minimum wages that is granted for a period of six months before this Court in Writ Petition No.100926/2022. The Coordinate Bench dismissing the Writ petition has observed as follows:
"3. This claim by the contesting respondents was based on the Government Order bearing No.PÁ.E 152 J¯ï.qÀ§ÆèJ 2008 dated 21.02.2011. Similar claim was made before the competent officer in Gulbarga in proceeding bearing No. PÁCUÀÄ/PÀªÉÃPÁ/PÉèÃA/Cfð-53/2012 in terms of the order dated 12.06.2013. The claim was allowed. Aggrieved by the said order, the present petitioners filed writ petition No.202674/2015 on the file of High Court of Karnataka, bench at Kalaburgi. Writ petition is dismissed vide order dated 10.09.2015. Against the said order, writ appeal is filed in Writ Appeal No.200369/2015. The said appeal was dismissed on 30.05.2016 confirming the order of learned Single Judge. The State filed SLP No.21549/2016. The said petition is also dismissed.
4. In the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would contend that the present writ petition is not maintainable.
5. Learned AGA appearing for the petitioners would contend that the writ petition as well as the writ appeal have been decided without hearing the contention of the petitioner-State. This Court is unable to accept the said contention. It is also pointed out before this Court by the learned counsel for the respondents that the State has
- 20 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
made payment in favour of some of the claimants who had the benefit of the order dated 12.06.2013 in Application No.53/2012. This being the position, this Court does not find any reason to interfere in the writ petition. The contention that the State was not properly heard before passing the orders in Writ Petition No.202674/2015 cannot be accepted. This order is confirmed by the Division Bench as well as in Writ Appeal no.200369/2015.
6. In the impugned order reference is made to the order passed by the coordinate bench as well as the order passed by the Division Bench of Kalburgi Bench in writ appeal No.200369/2015. And based on said orders the impugned order is passed."
11. The Coordinate Bench observes that the petitioner therein was entitled to the claim as was granted in Kalaburgi District. Therefore, the petition deserves to succeed, on that sole score and becomes entitled to six months difference that is sought for, as a prayer, in the representation.
12. Before parting with the judgment, it is necessary to observe that the State has repeated the same endorsement despite it being quashed to get over the contempt, such actions needs to be deprecated, as it would amount to a contempt on the face of it, as repeating the same endorsements that are quashed by this Court. This Court is holding its hands in not referring the matter to the contempt Court solely on the score that the petitioner is wanting his six months difference, in minimum wages.
13. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is allowed.
(ii) The endorsement dated 06.08.2024 issued by the respondent No.2 vide Annexure-M stands quashed.
(iii) Mandamus issues to the respondents to make payment of six months
- 21 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
minimum wages difference as is being paid to Library Supervisor at Kalaburgi District between 21.02.2021 and 21.08.2011 within an outer limit of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not earlier. Ordered accordingly."
3. The next person is before the Court, yet again. The
petitioner individually is back before this Court notwithstanding
the fact that he was one of the petitioners in the conglomeration
of petitioners which decided minimum wages to be granted to
those petitioners.
4. The learned HCGP would seek to defend the action on
the score that the petitioner has not approached this Court and
this Court has not directed payment of minimum wages. The said
submission on the face of it is untenable.
5. It is not the law that every person, who is similarly
placed, should keep knocking at the doors of this Court. It is the
State's duty that if they are entitled to a relief that is granted to
a similarly situated person, every person need not be driven to
the Court. It is the settled principle of law.
6. In that light the State is driving every person to
come before this Court, and seek minimum wages of ₹19,400/-
- 22 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:15994
HC-KAR
time and again, therefore, the State must be milked with costs
for driving 94 petitioners.
7. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
i. The petition is thus allowed.
ii. Mandamus issues to the respondent-State to pay the
amount as sought for in terms of representation dated
08.10.2025 without brooking any further delay, with costs of
litigation at ₹2,000/- per per petitioner.
iii. In the event the State would not pay the amount to
these petitioners, within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of the
copy of the order, the costs gets enhanced to ₹10,000/- per
petitioner.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
KGK/CT-ASC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!