Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manikanta vs State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 10457 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10457 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Manikanta vs State Of Karnataka on 20 November, 2025

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC:47985
                                                       CRL.P No. 13044 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13044 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                            483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    MANIKANTA
                            S/O RAMANJINAPPA @ ANJINAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
                            R/AT KARIYAMMAMAPALYA VILLAGE
                            PAVAGADA TALUK
                            TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 561 202.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI M SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY ARASIKERE PS
Digitally signed by
                            REPRESENTED BY SPP
LAKSHMINARAYANA             HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
                            BENGALURU - 560 001.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                                                        ...RESPONDENT
KARNATAKA
                      (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA B ADDL. SPP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.PC (FILED
                      rU/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT BAIL TO HIM IN S.C
                      No.5028/2025 ORIGINATED FROM CR.No.01/2025 OF THE
                      RESPONDENT ARASIKERE PS, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE
                      PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 103(1), 238 NAD 303(2) OF
                      BNS, 2023.
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC:47985
                                          CRL.P No. 13044 of 2025


HC-KAR




    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                             ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by sole accused under Section

483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in S.C.No.5028/2025

arising out of Crime No.01/2025 of Arasikere Police Station

registered for offences punishable under Sections 103(1),

238 and 303(2) of BNS, 2023 pending on the file of the IV

Additional District in Sessions Judge, Tumkuru sitting at

Madhugiri.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional SPP for the respondent -State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would

contend that the case of the prosecution is based on

circumstantial evidence. C.W.2 stated to have last seen

accused and deceased together. C.W.4 is stated to have

seen the petitioner -accused along with goats at

07.00p.m. and his statement is recorded after one month.

There is seizure of cash of Rs.53,500/- stated to be by

NC: 2025:KHC:47985

HC-KAR

sale of 06 goats. The said amount might be possessed by

the petitioner as he was broker in sheep market. The

sickle has been seized from the spot. The body was found

in forest area. The sickle does not belong to the petitioner

and it belongs to the deceased. The motive alleged is the

petitioner is want of money for construction of house.

Circumstances are fabricated by the complainant. There is

a delay of one day in filing the complaint. As charge sheet

is filed, the petitioner is not required for custodial

interrogation. With these, he prays to allow the petition

and grant bail to the petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Additional SPP for the

respondent -State would contend that there are

circumstances which clearly indicate the involvement of

this petitioner in committing the murder of the deceased.

C.W.2 has last seen accused and deceased at 02.45 p.m.

C.W.4 has seen this petitioner taking away 25 goats at

07.00 p.m. There is seizure of Rs.53,500/- which has been

got by sale of 06 goats and the remaining 19 goats have

NC: 2025:KHC:47985

HC-KAR

been seized from the house of C.W.11. The sickle has

been seized at the instance of this petitioner -accused

hidden in a forest area and it is found to be blood stained.

There is seizure of blood stained clothes of the petitioner.

The FSL report indicates that the stains on the said clothes

are human blood of 'O' group and even the clothes of the

deceased were stained with human blood of 'O' group. The

charge sheet materials shows prima facie case against the

petitioner for offences alleged against him. With this she

prayed for rejection of the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsels, this Court has

perused charge sheet and other materials placed on

record.

6. The case of the prosecution is that the

petitioner and the deceased went for grazing the cows of

petitioner and goats of deceased on 03.01.2025. The

petitioner who was in need of money for construction of

his house planned to kill the deceased and take away his

25 goats. The petitioner took the sickle of the deceased

NC: 2025:KHC:47985

HC-KAR

and assaulted him with said sickle on his neck and other

parts and committed his murder and took away 25 goats.

7. The case of the prosecution is based on

circumstantial evidence. C.W.2 is stated to have last seen

the petitioner -accused and deceased together at

02.45p.m. on 03.01.2025. The C.W.4 is stated to have

seen the petitioner -accused taking away 25 goats at

07.00p.m. on 3.01.2025. 19 goats have been seized from

the house of C.W.11 who has stated that they are brought

by the petitioner. A sum of Rs.53,500/- has been seized

from the petitioner, which he got by sale of 06 goats. The

sickle has been seized at the instance of this petitioner

hidden in a forest area and it is stained with the human

blood of 'O' group. Shirt and Bermuda of the petitioner

have been seized under mahazar and they are found to be

blood stained of human origin of 'O' group. The blood of

the deceased was 'O' positive group as per lab report. The

clothes of the deceased are also stained with 'O' blood

group. Therefore, the clothes of the petitioner and the

NC: 2025:KHC:47985

HC-KAR

clothes of the deceased were stained with 'O' blood group.

The mahazar has been drawn of the undergoing

construction of the house of the petitioner to show the

motive of the petitioner to commit the offence. All the

above circumstances indicate the involvement of this

petitioner in committing murder and robbing the goats of

the deceased.

8. Considering above aspects, the petitioner has

not made out any grounds for grant of bail. In the result,

the petition is dismissed.

Observations made in the above order will not

influence the trial Court at the time of passing judgment.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DSP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter