Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Mohammed Yasin @ Yaseen vs State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 10266 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10266 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Mohammed Yasin @ Yaseen vs State Of Karnataka on 14 November, 2025

Author: Mohammad Nawaz
Bench: Mohammad Nawaz
                                          -1-
                                                       NC: 2025:KHC:46740
                                                 CRL.P No. 14823 of 2025


               HC-KAR




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                     DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                        BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
                        CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14823 OF 2025


               BETWEEN:

                     SRI. MOHAMMED YASIN @ YASEEN
                     S/O LATE MAKBUL AHAMED,
                     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, (PRESENT AGE)
                     R/AT NO.2636, 4TH CROSS,
                     M.K.D.K. ROAD, MANDI MOHALLA,
                     MYSORE-570 001.
                                                            ...PETITIONER
               (BY SRI. GAURAV SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE)

               AND:

               1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                     NARASIMHA RAJA POLICE STATION
                     MYSURU CITY,
                     REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Digitally
signed by            HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
LAKSHMI T
Location:
                     BENGALURU-560 001.
High Court
of Karnataka
               2.    SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR.S.ITAGI
                     POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, INV-1,
                     AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, (PRESENT AGE)
                     NARASIMHARAJA POLICE STATION,
                     MYSORE CITY-570 001.
                                                          ...RESPONDENTS
               (BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR M.V., HCGP FOR R1)

                    THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
               BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL
               PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN
               C.C.NO.6293/2024 (CRIME NO.103/2024) PENDING ON THE
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC:46740
                                   CRL.P No. 14823 of 2025


HC-KAR




FILE OF III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT AT
MYSORE FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 NARASIMHARAJA
POLICE STATION, MYSORE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 20(b)(ii)(A) OF NDPS ACT.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ


                         ORAL ORDER

Petitioner, arraigned as accused No.2 in Crime

No.103/2024 of Narasimharaja Police Station, Mysuru City

and in the charge sheet filed by the Police, for the offence

punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the NDPS Act,

1985 is before this Court seeking to quash the proceedings

initiated against him.

2. FIR is registered on a suo motu complaint

lodged by the PSI, INV-1, NR Police Station, Mysuru City.

It is the case of prosecution that on 07.07.2024 at about

10.00 a.m., while the police were on rounds, they noticed

a person moving in a suspicious manner near Gate No. 6,

Kabaristan Road holding a bag. When he started running

away on seeing the police, he was apprehended and it was

NC: 2025:KHC:46740

HC-KAR

found on search that he had concealed 40 grams of dry

ganja in his bag. The said ganja and the bag were seized

under a mahazar.

3. Petitioner has been arraigned as accused No.2

on the ground that the ganja seized in this case was

supplied by him to accused No.1. To substantiate the said

allegation, this Court finds that except the voluntary

statement of the accused there is no other material placed

by the prosecution. The voluntary statement of the

accused alone is not sufficient to hold that the ganja

seized in this case from the possession of accused No.1

was supplied by the petitioner. There is not an iota of

corroboration in that regard, except the confessional

statement of accused No.1 and the petitioner.

4. In similar circumstances, relying on the

judgment of the Apex Court in Toofan Singh v. State of

Tamil Nadu, (2021) 4 SCC 1, reiterated in Balvinder

Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau, 2023 SCC Online

SC 1213, this Court in Criminal Petition No. 1850/2023

NC: 2025:KHC:46740

HC-KAR

disposed on 19.07.2024 has quashed the proceedings in

respect of the petitioner therein. It is observed that the

statements of the co-accused recorded under Section 67

of the NDPS Act, is clearly hit by Section 25 of the

Evidence Act, as is considered by the Apex Court. Hence,

the continuation of proceedings against the petitioner

would amount to an abuse of process of law. Petition,

therefore succeeds. Accordingly, allowed.

The entire proceeding against the petitioner/accused

No.2 in C.C.No.6293/2024 pending before the III

Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Mysuru is quashed.

Sd/-

(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE

HB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter