Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tikasa S/O Narayan Habib vs Narayansa S/O Tikasa Habib
2025 Latest Caselaw 10117 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10117 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Tikasa S/O Narayan Habib vs Narayansa S/O Tikasa Habib on 12 November, 2025

Author: R.Devdas
Bench: R.Devdas
                                               -1-
                                                         NC: 2025:KHC-D:15448-DB
                                                         RFA No. 100233 of 2023


                     HC-KAR




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

                    DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
                                     PRESENT

                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS
                                       AND
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
                         R.F.A. NO.100233 OF 2023 (PAR/POS)

                    BETWEEN:

                    1.   TIKASA S/O. NARAYANSA HABIB,
                         AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                         R/O. BHANDAGE BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR,
                         BESIDE SHAMBHU PAN SHOP,
                         GHANTIKERI ONI CROSS,
                         AGASAR ONI, HUBBALLI-580030.

                    2.   SMT. DIVYA W/O. TIKASA HABIB,
                         AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                         R/O. BHANDAGE BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR,
                         BESIDE SHAMBHU PAN SHOP,
Digitally signed
                         GHANTIKERI ONI CROSS,
by V N
BADIGER
                         AGASAR ONI, HUBBALLI-580030.
Location: High
Court of
                                                                    ...APPELLANTS
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench.
                    (BY SRI. SADASHIV S. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                    AND:

                    1.   NARAYANSA S/O. TIKASA HABIB,
                         AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                         R/O. H.NO. 19, 2ND CROSS,
                         PRAGATI COLONY, VIDYANAGAR,
                         HUBLI, PIN CODE-580021.

                    2.   NAGARAJ S/O. NARAYANSA HABIB,
                         AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                            -2-
                                     NC: 2025:KHC-D:15448-DB
                                     RFA No. 100233 of 2023


HC-KAR




     R/O. H.NO. 19, 2ND CROSS,
     PRAGATI COLONY, VIDYANAGAR,
     HUBLI, PIN CODE-580021.

3.   MAHADEV S/O. NARAYANSA HABIB,
     AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O. H.NO. 19, 2ND CROSS,
     PRAGATI COLONY, VIDYANAGAR,
     HUBLI, PIN CODE-580021.

4.   RAJU S/O. NARAYANSA HABIB,
     AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O. H.NO. 19, 2ND CROSS,
     PRAGATI COLONY, VIDYANAGAR,
     HUBLI, PIN CODE-580021.

5.   SMT. MANJULA W/O. RAMCHANDRA BARAD,
     AGE: 48 YEARS, OOC: HOUSE WIFE,
     R/O. BESIDE BHAVANI PRINTING PRESS,
     AGASAR ONI, HUBBALLI-580020.

6.  SMT. ROOPA @ REKHA W/O. SURESH ATHANI,
    AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE,
    R/O. FLAT NO.102, MADHURA APARTMENT,
    NEW BADAMI NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580023.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VADIRAJ P. VADAVI, ADVOCATE)

     THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 OF CPC., 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE PASSED IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.116/2022, PASSED BY
THE HON'BLE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
HUBBALLI VIDE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2023, IN
THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS
          AND
          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
                              -3-
                                    NC: 2025:KHC-D:15448-DB
                                     RFA No. 100233 of 2023


HC-KAR




                      ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)

1. Parties to this appeal, namely the appellants and

the respondents have filed a compromise petition under

Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, stating

that they have amicably settled their dispute in terms of the

said compromise petition.

2. It is stated that Respondent No.5 - Smt. Manjula

and Respondent No.6 - Smt. Roopa @ Rekha have

relinquished their rights in the suit schedule properties in

favour of the other parties and have declared that they

have no claim whatsoever in respect of the said properties.

3. The two items of the suit schedule properties are

divided between Appellant No.1, Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in

the manner stated in the compromise petition.

4. This Court has read over the contents of the

compromise petition to Respondent Nos.5 and 6 - Smt.

Manjula and Smt. Roopa @ Rekha, and ascertained from

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15448-DB

HC-KAR

them whether they have understood the terms of the

compromise. Both Respondents Nos.5 and 6 have clearly

stated that they have understood the contents of the

compromise petition and that they have voluntarily given up

all their claims whatsoever in respect of the suit schedule

properties. They have also stated that they have no further

claim against the other parties to these proceedings.

5. The compromise petition also records the fact

that Appellant No.2 who is the wife of Appellant No.1 has

consented to the allotment of 1 acre 15 guntas of land in

favour of her husband, Appellant No.1 and has given up all

her independent claims, having regard to the gift deed

executed in her favour by Appellant No.1.

6. Consequently, suit in O.S.No.16/2022, on the file

of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, JMFC, Hubballi

is decreed in terms of the compromise petition filed by the

parties. Accordingly, the judgment and decree passed by

the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, JMFC, Hubballi is

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15448-DB

HC-KAR

modified in accordance with the terms of the compromise

petition filed by the parties herein.

7. The parties are directed to affix their signatures

on the order sheet, which shall be duly identified by their

respective learned counsel.

8. The office is directed to refund the court fee to

the appellants in accordance with law. Draw decree

accordingly.

Sd/-

(R.DEVDAS) JUDGE

Sd/-

(B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE

VB /CT-AN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter