Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karthik vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 10109 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10109 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Karthik vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 November, 2025

                                                   -1-
                                                                NC: 2025:KHC:45960
                                                            CRL.A No. 2187 of 2025


                       HC-KAR



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                             DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
                                                BEFORE
                                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2187 OF 2025 (U/S 14(A) (2))
                       BETWEEN:

                       KARTHIK
                       S/O. NARAYANAPPA
                       AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
                       R/AT. MANIGATTA MITTA VILLAGE,
                       BYRAKUR HOBLI, HEBBANI POST,
                       MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.
                       PIN 563 131
                                                                      ...APPELLANT
                       (BY SRI. SHARANA BASAPPA G., ADV.)
                       AND:

                       1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                             BY NANGLI POLICE STATION,
                             KOLAR.
                             REPRESENTED BY
Digitally signed by
                             STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
LAKSHMINARAYAN N
Location: HIGH COURT
                             HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
OF KARNATAKA
                             BENGALURU-560 001.

                       2.    ANITHA N,
                             D/O. NAGARAJA,
                             AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
                             R/AT. MANIGATTA MITTA VILLAGE,
                             BYRAKUR HOBLI,
                             HEBBANI POST,
                             MULBAGAL TALUK,
                             KOLAR DISTRICT.
                             PIN - 563 131
                                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
                       (BY KUM. ASMA KOUSER, ADDL SPP.)
                              -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC:45960
                                      CRL.A No. 2187 of 2025


HC-KAR




      THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14A(2) OF SC AND ST (POA)
ACT BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE II ADDL.DIST.
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR IN CR.NO.151/2025, DATED,
24.10.2025 AND ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN
CR.NO.151/2025 OF NANGLI POLICE FOR THE ALLEGED
O/P/U/S 69, 89, 318(4), 351(2),3(5) OF BNS, 2023 AND SEC.
3(1)(r)(s), 3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) AND
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.DIST. AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, KOLAR.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

                      ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The appellant/accused No.3 has preferred this appeal

against the order dated 24.10.2025 in Crime No.151/2025

of Nangli Police passed by the II Additional District and

Sessions Judge, Kolar (for short 'the trial Court').

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are

referred to the same rank and status before the trial

Court.

3. The brief facts leading to this appeal are that, on the

basis of the complaint filed by Anitha.N, Nangli Police have

NC: 2025:KHC:45960

HC-KAR

registered the case in Crime No.151/2025 against accused

1 to 3 for the commission of offences under sections

318(4), 69, 89, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and sections

3(1)(r)(s), 3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (POA)

Amendment Act, 2015.

4. The appellant/accused No.3 - Karthik had been

already arrested on 16.10.2025 and he is not required for

further investigation. Thereafter, accused No.3 filed

application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 seeking

regular bail. Same came to be rejected by the trial Court

on 24.10.2025. Being aggrieved by this order of rejection,

the appellant/accused No.3 has preferred this appeal.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant/accused No.3 would submit that, there is no

allegation against the present appellant to attract the

alleged offence under the penal provisions of SC & ST

(POA) Act and also offence punishable under sections

318(4), 69, 89 of BNS, 2023. The only offence attracted

NC: 2025:KHC:45960

HC-KAR

to the present accused, is the offence under section

351(2) of Indian Penal Code which is not punishable with

death or imprisonment for life. The appellant is ready to

abide by the conditions which may be imposed by this

Court. On all these grounds, it is sought for allowing this

appeal.

6. Learned Additional SPP has supported the order

passed by the trial Court and sought for dismissal of this

appeal.

7. I have examined the materials placed before this

Court. On the basis of complaint filed by Anitha.N, Nangli

Police have registered the case against accused 1 to 3 for

the commission of offences under sections 318(4), 69, 89,

351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and sections 3(1)(r)(s),

3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (POA) Amendment Act,

2015.

8. The substance of the First Information Report reads

as under:

NC: 2025:KHC:45960

HC-KAR

" ಾಂಕ 5.10.2025 ರಂzÀ ರಂ Ä ಸಂ ೆ 4-30 ಗಂ ೆಯ ಾ ಎ .

     ಅ ತ              ಾಗ ಾಜ,
                         ಾಜ 24 ವಷ , ೋ           ಜ ಾಂಗ,
                                                    ಾಂಗ ಾಸ ಮ"ಘಟ% «ÄlÖ
     &ಾ'ಮ,
     &ಾ'ಮ ಮುಳ*ಾಗಲು ,ಾಲೂಕು ರವgÀ
                          ರವ Ä .ಾ/ೆ&ೆ ಬಂzÀ
                                      ಬಂ Ä                          ೕ1ದ ದೂ3ನ
     5ಾ ಾಂಶ ೇ ೆಂದ ೆ,

ೆ ,ಾನು ಮತು7 ತಮ8 &ಾ'ಮದ 9. . ಮಂಜು ಾಥ ಎಂಬ ºÀÄqÀÄUÀ ಸು;ಾgÀ ಸು;ಾ Ä 5 ವಷ ಗ<ಂದ ಪರಸ>ರ 'ೕ?@AೊಳBC?7ದುD, ಾಂಕ:03.01.2020 ಾಂಕ ರಂzÀ ರಂ Ä ತಮ8 ಊ ಾದ ಮ"ಘಟ%Fಟ% &ಾ'ಮದ ತಮ8 Gೆ'ೕ;ಾನುಬಂಧ ದೃಢ ಾKತು.

                                             ಾKತು            ನಂತರ         ಪರಸ>ರ
         'ೕ?@AೊಳBC?7ದುD, ,ಾ ೕಬLರು *ೆಂಗಳM3ನ              ೆ.Aೆ
                                                         ೆ Aೆ.
                                                           Aೆ    ೆ5ೊ%ೕ ೆಂN ನ
     ?ಂಗ<ಂದ           2    *ಾ3    ,ಾ ಬLರು      ಒಂPಾಗು?7PೆDವQ.
                                                           Q      ,ಾನು      ಎರqÀ
                                                                            ಎರ Ä

?ಂಗ<&ೊR8 ಊ3&ೆ ಬಂPಾಗಲು ಸಹ ಒಂPಾಗು?7PೆDವQ.

Q ಇPೇ 3ೕ?

ಸು;ಾರು 5ಾ3 ಮಂಜು ಾಥ ರವgÀ ರವ Ä ತನUನುU ಮದು ೆ ಾಗು,ೆ7ೕ ೆಂದು ನಂ @ Vಾ3ೕ3ಕ ಾW ಬಳ@AೊಳBC?7ದ.D JgÀqÀÄ *ಾ3 *ಾ3 ತನ&ೆ ಅ*ಾಷ ;ಾ1@ದ ನಂತರ ಪರಸ>ರ 'ೕ?@AೊಳBC?7PೆDವQ.

                                                            Q         ಾಹ ಾಗಲು
     ?ೕ;ಾ           @ರು,ೆ7ೕ ೆ ಇದರ ಮXೆY ಮಂಜು ಾಥ ರವgÀ
                                               ರವ Ä *ೇ ೆ ಹುಡುWಯ
         ೊ,ೆ       ಾಹ ಾಗಲು @ದ[ ಾWದುD, ತನ&ೆ             \ಾರ &ೊ,ಾ7W Aೇ<ದDAೆ]
         ೕನು ಎ^.@
             ಎ^ @.          ಾ?&ೆ 5ೇ3ದವಳB ತಮ8 ಮ ೆಯ                ಒಪQ>?7ಲ    ೕನು
     *ೇ ೆಯವ
         ೆಯವ ೊಂ &ೆ ಮದು ೆ DUÀÄ ಇಲ ಾದ                ಎ       ಾದರೂ _ೋW ೇಣು
     _ಾaAೊಂಡು 5ಾK ತನ&ೆ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಲ JAzÀÄ ತನ&ೆ                          ಾ?      ಂದ ೆ
     ;ಾ1ರು,ಾ7 ೆ.
              ೆ ಅbೆ% ಅಲPೆ ಸದ3 ಅ5ಾFಯು                      ಾಂಕ:
                                                          ಾಂಕ 10.10.2025
     ರಂzÀ
     ರಂ Ä ಾ?' 8-00 ಗಂ ೆ ಸಮಯದ                   ತನ&ೆ cೕ       ;ಾ1 Gಾ'ಣ *ೆದ3Aೆ
     _ಾaದುD, 9. . ಮಂಜು ಾಥ ರವರ

ರವರ 5ೆUೕdತ ಾದ ಅPೇ &ಾ'ಮದ ಹ3ೕe . ೆfೆgಪ>, > ಮತು7 Aಾ? h ಾ ಾಯಣಪ> gÀªÀgÀÄ ಾi ಸಂXಾನAಾ]W ಬಂ ದುD, ,ಾನು ಒಪ> PಾDಗ ನ&ೆ ಒಂzÀ ಒಂ Ä ಕfೆಯ ಅವAಾಶ Aೊಡು?7PೆDೕ ೆ ೕನು ಒಪ>Pೆ ಇದD ೆ ನUನುU Aೊjೆ ;ಾಡು,ೆ7ೕ ೆಂದು Gಾ'ಣ *ೆದ3Aೆ _ಾaರು,ಾ7gÉAvÀ Aೊಟ% ದೂ3ನ ದೂ3ನ Rೕ ೆ&ೆ ಈ ಪ'.ವ ಪ' ವ.ವರ ವರ . "

9. On careful examination of the contents, it is crystal

clear that the only allegation against the present appellant

NC: 2025:KHC:45960

HC-KAR

is that, he along with accused No.2 threatened the victim

to kill her. Except this allegation, absolutely there are no

materials to attract the alleged penal provision of SC & ST

(POA) Act. Hence, there is no bar to grant Regular Bail as

the alleged commission of offence under Section 351(2) of

BNS, 2023 is not punishable with death or imprisonment

for life. Considering the nature and gravity of offence,

antecedents of the appellant and the role of the

appellant/accused No.3 in this case, it is just and proper to

allow this appeal. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is allowed.

(ii) The order dated 24.10.2025 in Crime

No.151/2025 of Nangli Police passed by the

II Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Kolar, is set aside. Consequently, the bail

application filed under Section 483 of

BNSS, 2023 is allowed.

NC: 2025:KHC:45960

HC-KAR

(iii) The appellant/accused No.3 shall be

released on bail on executing self-bond of

Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for likesum

to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

(iv) The appellant/accused No.3 shall not

tamper or threaten the prosecution

witnesses in any manner.

(v) The appellant/accused No.3 shall assist the

Investigating Officer for investigation.

Sd/-

(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

DHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter