Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahiboobu Sab @ Mabusab vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 222 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 222 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Mahiboobu Sab @ Mabusab vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 May, 2025

                                             -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC-K:2737
                                                    CRL.P No. 200747 of 2025




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                           CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200747 OF 2025
                                   (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   MAHIBOOBU SAB @ MABUSAB
                        S/O SADDAM HUSENA SAB,
                        AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                        R/O DEVATAGAL VILLAGE-584111,
                        TQ. DEODURGA, DIST. RAICHUR.

                   2.   SADDAMA HUSENA SAB @ HUSEN SAB
                        S/O KHASIM SAB,
                        AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
                        R/O DEVATAGAL VILLAGE-584111,
                        TQ. DEODURGA, DIST. RAICHUR.

                   3.   PEERAMMA @ PIRAMMA
Digitally signed
by RENUKA               W/O SADDAMA HUSENA SAB @ HUSEN SAB,
Location:               AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
HIGH COURT
OF                      R/O DEVATAGAL VILLAGE-584111,
KARNATAKA
                        TQ. DEODURGA, DIST. RAICHUR.

                   4.   KHASIM BEE @ KHASIMBI
                        D/O SADDAMA HUSENA SAB @ HUSEN SAB,
                        AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
                        R/O DEVATAGAL VILLAGE-584111,
                        TQ. DEODURGA, DIST. RAICHUR.

                                                                ...PETITIONERS

                   (BY SRI. LIYAQAT FAREED USTAD, ADVOCATE)
                                 -2-
                                                 NC: 2025:KHC-K:2737
                                        CRL.P No. 200747 of 2025




AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
       THROUGH JALAHALLI PS,
       DEVADURGA RURAL CIRCLE, DISTRICT RAICHUR,
       REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. SPP,
       HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
       BENCH AT KALABURAGI-585 107.

2.     NOORAJAN BEGHAM W/O MAHIBOOBU SAB,
       AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
       R/O DEVATAGAL VILLAGE-584111,
       TQ. DEVDURGA, DIST. RAICHUR.

                                                    ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. MALIK PASHA MAUZAN, ADV. FOR R2)


        THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.
(OLD), U/SEC. 528 OF BNSS (NEW), PRAYING TO QUASH THE
FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.57/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 R/W 3(5) OF THE
BHARATIYA      NYAYA    SANHITA       (BNS)   ACT    2023,    BY   THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 JALAHALLI PS, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE
FILE    OF   PRL.   CIVIL   JUDGE     (SR.DN.)    AND   CJM    COURT
DEODURGA RAICHUR DIST.

        THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
                               -3-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC-K:2737
                                      CRL.P No. 200747 of 2025




                        ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K)

This petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to

quash the proceeding in Crime No.57/2025 dated

02.04.2025 filed by the Jalhalli Police Station against the

petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 for the offences under

Section 85, 115(2), 351(2) & 352 read with Section 3(5)

of BNSS, 2023.

2. The factual matrix of the prosecution case is

that respondent No.2 being the wife of petitioner No.1,

their marriage solemnized in the year 2016, out of

wedlock two children were born, thereafter, the accused

No.1 started to quarrel with her by suspecting her fidelity.

As such, she has lodged the complaint. On the strength of

the said compliant, FIR came to be registered as stated

supra.

3. Presently, the parties have settled their dispute

amicably and today respondent No.2 is present before this

NC: 2025:KHC-K:2737

Court along with petitioner Nos.1 to 4/accused Nos.1 to 4

and she states that they both settled the dispute amicably

and she is ready to join petitioner No.1. The petitioner

No.1 is ready to take her back to the matrimonial home.

In such circumstance, relying on the judgment of Apex

Court in the case of GIAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF

PUNJAB AND ANOTHER1, though the offence is not

compoundable in nature, I am of the considered the view

that dispute emerged between the family members, the

proceedings need not be continued. Accordingly, I proceed

to pass the following.



                                    ORDER

         i.     The petition is allowed.

         ii.    The FIR and further proceedings in Crime

                No.57/2025        for    the   offence   punishable

under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) & 352

read with Section 3(5) of BNSS, 2023 is

(2012) 10 Supreme Court Cases 303

NC: 2025:KHC-K:2737

hereby quashed is so far as petitioners are

concerned.

Sd/-

(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

TMP

CT: AK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter