Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K Saroja W/O. K. P. Obaiah vs K Jyothi W/O. K. Shantha Kumar
2025 Latest Caselaw 5682 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5682 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

K Saroja W/O. K. P. Obaiah vs K Jyothi W/O. K. Shantha Kumar on 28 March, 2025

Author: V.Srishananda
Bench: V.Srishananda
                                                   -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:5756
                                                         CRL.RP No. 100379 of 2023




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                         DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                                BEFORE

                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

                         CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100379 OF 2023
                                    (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS))

                       BETWEEN:

                       K. SAROJA W/O. K. P. OBAIAH,
                       AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
                       R/O. LITTLE FLOWERS HIGH SCHOOL,
                       OPPOSITE TO P AND T QUARTERS,
                       T. B. SANATORIUM ROAD, CANTONMENT,
                       DIST. BALLARI-583102.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI SHIVA SHIRUR, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       K. JYOTHI W/O. K. SHANTHA KUMAR,
                       AGE: 51YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
                       R/O. HOUSE NO.13A, DEEPU NILAYA,
         Digitally
         signed by V
                       BANDIHATTI ROAD, OPP. GOLDSMITH COLONY,
         N BADIGER
VN
BADIGER Date:
        2025.03.29
                       MUNCIPAL COLONY, BALLARI-583102.
         12:03:12
         +0530                                                       ...RESPONDENT
                       (BY SRI MAHESH WADEYAR, ADVOCATE)

                             THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397
                       R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE
                       COURTS BELOW AND FURTHER ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION BY
                       SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION
                       PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
                       (COMMERCIAL COURT) AT BALLARI, IN CRL. APPL. NO. 47/2022
                       VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 25.08.2022, AND THE JUDGMENT AND
                       ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND
                       J.M.F.C AT BALLARI IN C.C.NO. 687/2015, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED
                       06.01.2022 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER.
                              -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC-D:5756
                                   CRL.RP No. 100379 of 2023




    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

                        ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

Parties are present with respective Advocates and

they present a joint memo. Joint memo reads as under:

"That, the son of the Rev Petitioner Namely Shamkishor and respondent jointly submits as under

That, with the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties to the lis have entered into joint memo as below.

1. That, the son of R.Petitioner has deposited Rs. 2,40,000/- before the trail court and respondent has already withdrawn the same.

2. That, the Son of Rev Petitioner hereby undertakes to pay remaining balance amount of Rs.3,60,000/- within 6 months from today.

That, the Son of rev petitioner and respondent hereby agreed to the above mentioned terms, and the same may kindly be taken on record and the top noted Petition may be disposed off in terms of this memo."

Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition

stands disposed of.

It is made clear that amount as agreed in the joint

memo if not paid by the revision petitioner, order of the

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5756

learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate

Court stands restored automatically and respondent is at

liberty to execute the impugned order.

Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the

complainant under due identification.

After payment of entire compensation amount, fine

amount of Rs.10,000/- imposed by the learned Trial

Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court towards

defraying expenses of the State stands set aside.

SD/-

(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

KAV CT:PA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter