Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Jayaramaiah H S vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 5555 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5555 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Jayaramaiah H S vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 March, 2025

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty
                                                   -1-
                                                                NC: 2025:KHC:12811
                                                           CRL.P No. 3045 of 2025




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                             CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3045 OF 2025
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SRI JAYARAMAIAH H S
                         S/O. LATE B. SIDDALINGAIAH,
                         AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
                         R/AT HALEPETE, HULIYURDURGA VILLAGE,
                         HULIYURDURGA HOBLI,
                         KUNIGAL TALUK -572123

                   2.    SMT. PREMA,
                         W/O. LATE SIDDALINGAIAH,
                         AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
                         R/AT NO.448, 4TH CROSS,
                         3RD MAIN, NEAR AMBIKA
                         HIGH SCHOOL, JAI MARUTHI NAGAR,
                         NANDINI LAYOUT,
                         BENGALURU NORTH,
Digitally signed         BENGALURU -560096
by NIRMALA
DEVI               3.    SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA,
Location:                W/O. JAYARAMAIAH H.S,
HIGH COURT               AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
OF                       R/AT HALEPETE,
KARNATAKA                HULIYURDURGA VILLAGE,
                         HULIYURDURGA HOBLI,
                         KUNIGAL TALUK -572123
                                                                     ...PETITIONERS
                   (BY SRI. LETHIF B., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                   BY HULIYURDURGA POLICE STATION
                   KUNIGAL TALUK,
                   TUMKUR DISTRICT
                                   -2-
                                                      NC: 2025:KHC:12811
                                              CRL.P No. 3045 of 2025




REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
                                                            ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K NAGESHWARAPPA ., HCGP)

      THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.PC (FILED U/S 482 BNSS)
PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR
ARREST IN C.C.NO.1792/2024 (CR.NO.132/2021) HULIYURDURGA
P.S. FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 465,468,471,419,506 OF IPC PENDING
ON THE FILE OF HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT
KUNIGAL AND ETC.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                            ORAL ORDER

Accused Nos.1 to 3 in CC No.1792/2024 pending before

the Court of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kunigal, arising out of

Crime No.132/2021 registered by Huliyurdurga Police Station,

Kunigal, Tumakuru, for the offences punishable under Sections

465, 468, 471, 419, 506 of IPC are before this Court under

Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., seeking for Anticipatory Bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.132/2021 was registered by

Huliyurdurga Police Station, Kunigal, Tumakuru, for the

aforesaid offences based on the first information dated

6.7.2021 received from B.Siddalingaiah, against the petitioners

herein and others. Apprehending arrest in the said case, the

NC: 2025:KHC:12811

petitioners had filed Crl.Misc.No.235/2025 before the

jurisdictional Sessions Court, which was rejected on 21.2.2025.

Therefore, they are before this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners having

reiterated the grounds urged in the petition prays to allow the

petition.

4. Per contra, the learned HCGP opposed the petition.

5. A perusal of the material on record would go to

show that the allegation in the first information submitted by

the first informant B.Siddalingaiah against the petitioners is

that they had created certain fraudulent documents and based

on the said documents revenue entries in respect of lands

bearing Sy.Nos.7/1A and 7/1B of Lakkashettipura village,

Huliyurdurga Hobli, Tumakuru, were changed. The material

produced by the learned counsel for the petitioners would go to

show that challenging the entries in respect of the lands

bearing Sy.Nos.7/1A and 7/1B, proceedings were initiated by

the first informant and others before the jurisdictional Assistant

Commissioner, who had dismissed the same and thereafter, the

said order was unsuccessfully challenged in an appeal before

the Deputy Commissioner. The material on record also goes to

NC: 2025:KHC:12811

show that there is a civil dispute between the parties in respect

of certain other items of land and the first informant and his

relatives had filed OS No.281/1997 which was also dismissed

by judgment and decree dated 31.3.2023. In the present case,

after investigation, the police had filed 'B' report and the

learned Magistrate having rejected the 'B' report has issued

summons to the petitioners and thereafter has issued NBW

against the petitioners. It is under these circumstances, the

petitioners are apprehending arrest in this case.

6. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, I

am of the opinion that the prayer made by the petitioners for

grant of Anticipatory Bail in this petition needs to be answered

in the affirmative.

7. The petition is allowed. The respondent - Police or

any other police in the State of Karnataka are directed to

release the petitioners in the event of their arrest in Crime

No.132/2021 registered by Huliyurdurga Police Station,

Kunigal, Tumakuru, for the offences punishable under Sections

465, 468, 471, 419 and 506 of IPC, subject to the following

conditions:

NC: 2025:KHC:12811

1. The Petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

each with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

2. Petitioners shall regularly appear before the Trial Court without fail unless exempted by the Trial Court for valid reasons.

3. Petitioners shall not tamper with the prosecution witness and they shall co-operate with the police for investigation and appear before them whenever called upon.

4. The petitioners shall not involve in similar offences in future.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

ND

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter