Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5474 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5377
WP No. 101795 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 101795 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
SHREE SHIVA BASAV SPORTS AND SOCIAL CLUB,
SY NO.1690/1/A, AT-POST: KUDACHI,
TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 311,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
SRI. VINODKUMAR RAVASAB DARURE,
AGED: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O KUDACHI, TQ: RAIBAG,
DIST: BELAGAVI-591 311.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL KHOT., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
Location: HIGH BENGALURU-560 001.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BELAGAVI,
TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 001.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
BELAGAVI,
TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 001.
4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
ATHANI, SUB-DIVISION,
AHTHANI-591 201.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5377
WP No. 101795 of 2025
5. THE CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR,
HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG,
DIST: BELAGAVI-591 317.
6. THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR,
KUDACHI POLICE STATION,
KUDACHI, TQ: RAIBAG,
DIST: BELAGAVI-591 317.
7. THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND DEPUTY
REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
BELAGAVI, SAHAKARA ADALITA BHAVAN,
JAKKERI HONDA, NEAR RAILWAY OVER BRIDGE,
BELAGAVI-590 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN
RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS
UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Sunil Khot., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Praveen
K.Uppar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person.
2. Counsel for the respective parties jointly submits
that the issue involved in the captioned Writ Petition is covered
in terms of the Judgment passed by the Coordinate bench of
this Court in W.P.No.201133/2017.
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5377
3. AGA on instruction would submit that by imposing
the conditions incorporated in the said Judgment, the Writ
Petition may be allowed.
4. Heard, the contentions urged on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the Writ papers with utmost
care. The issue involved is covered in terms of the order passed
in W.P.No.201133/2017 referred above.
5. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed.
6. The petitioner shall adhere to the conditions
incorporated in the aforementioned Judgment which are as
under:
I. The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is/are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 day's period shall be made available by the petitioner, to the police, as and when called upon to do so.
II. The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5377
member(s), when called upon by the police, during the raid(s) and surveillance etc.
III. The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played, except games of skills. * [incorporated vide Judgment dated:27.06.2016 in Writ Appeal No.200290/2015].
IV. The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the police find that game(s) played is contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
V. The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5377
any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner's premises.
VI. The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner - Club/ Association.
VII. It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.
Sd/-
(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!