Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P Ravindra Naidu S/O Late P Bhaskar Naidu vs S A Habib S/O Late S Habib
2025 Latest Caselaw 5463 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5463 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

P Ravindra Naidu S/O Late P Bhaskar Naidu vs S A Habib S/O Late S Habib on 24 March, 2025

Author: V.Srishananda
Bench: V.Srishananda
                                                     -1-
                                                                   NC: 2025:KHC-D:5424
                                                         CRL.RP No. 100257 of 2022
                                                     C/W CRL.RP No. 100256 of 2022



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                          DHARWAD BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                                   BEFORE

                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

                            CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100257 OF 2022
                                       (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS))

                                                    C/W

                            CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100256 OF 2022


                       IN CRL.RP.NO.100257/2022:

                       BETWEEN:

                       P.RAVINDRA NAIDU
                       AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC. RAILWAY EMPLOYEE.
                       R/O UBL NO.135/A, RAILWAY QUARTERS,
                       RAIL COLONY, RAIL KALIAN KENDRA,
                       GADAG ROAD, HUBBALLI-580020.
                                                                          ...PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
MALLIKARJUN
RUDRAYYA KALMATH       AND:
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
                       SANTOSH S/O. SHYAMSUNDAR HABIB,
                       AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
                       R/O. FLAT NO.2, HABIB BUILDING,
                       BASESHWARA NAGAR, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580030.
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                       (RESPONDENT-NOTICE SERVED)

                              THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397
                       R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED
                       BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
                       IN   CRIMINAL   APPEAL   NO.52/2020   ON   08.07.2022   AND   THE
                                 -2-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:5424
                                    CRL.RP No. 100257 of 2022
                                C/W CRL.RP No. 100256 of 2022



JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN JMFC-III, HUBBALLI IN CC
NO.940/2019   ON   29.02.2020   MAY   BE   SET   ASIDE   AND   THE
PETITIONER MAY BE ACQUITTED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION
PETITION.


IN CRL.RP.NO.100256/2022:

BETWEEN:

P. RAVINDRA NAIDU
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC. RAILWAY EMPLOYEE,
R/O. UBL, 135/A, RAILWAY QUARTERS,
RAIL COLONY, RAIL KALYAN KENDRA,
GADAG ROAD, HUBBALLI-580020.
                                                    ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SANTOSH S/O. SHYAMSUNDAR HABIB,
AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. FLAT NO.2, HABIB BUILDING,
BASESHWARA NAGAR, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580030.
                                           ...RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT-NOTICE SERVED)

       THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO THAT THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.54/2020 ON 08.07.2022
AND THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN JMFC-III, HUBBALLI IN
CC NO.939/2019 ON 29.02.2020 MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THE
PETITIONER MAY BE ACQUITTED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
U/S.138 OF N.I. ACT, BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.


       THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                  -3-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC-D:5424
                                     CRL.RP No. 100257 of 2022
                                 C/W CRL.RP No. 100256 of 2022



                           ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

Common revision petitioner files memos in both the

petitions

Memo in Crl.RP.No.100257/2022 reads as under:

"The Petitioner respectfully submits as under:

1. It is submitted that the Petitioner has filed the above Criminal Revision Petition against judgment and order passed by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.52/2020 dated 08.07.2022 and the judgment and order passed JMFC-III, Hubballi in C.C. No.940/2019.

2. It is submitted that the Trial Court was pleased to convict the Accused/petitioner U/s 138 of the NI Act vide order dated 29-02- 2020 and directed the Petitioner to pay the fine amount of Rs. 59,000/- out of that the Accused shall pay the Rs. 49,000/- to the complainant and Rs. 10,000/- to the state towards prosecution expenses. And the same order was confirmed by the Lower Appellate Court.

3. It is submitted that the during the pendency of the above Criminal Revision Petition, the Petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs. 29,500/- before the III-JMFC Court, Hubballi on 22-03-2025. Petitioner is further ready to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 29,500/- ( Rupees Twenty Nine

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5424

Thousand and Five Hundred only) before the III-JMFC Court, Hubballi within 4 weeks from today.

Therefore it is respectfully prayed to set aside the judgment and order passed by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.52/2020 dated 08.07.2022 and the judgment and order passed JMFC-III, Hubballi in C.C. No.940/2019 and consequently acquit the Petitioner for the offence punishable U/s 138 of the NI Act in the above case in the interest of justice and equity."

Memo in Crl.RP.No.100256/2022 reads as under:

"The Petitioner respectfully submits as under:

1. It is submitted that the Petitioner has filed the above Criminal Revision Petition against judgment and order passed by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.54/2020 dated 08.07.2022 and the judgment and order passed JMFC-III, Hubballi in C.C. No.939/2019.

2. It is submitted that the Trial Court was pleased to convict the Accused/petitioner U/s 138 of the NI Act vide order dated 29-02-

2020 and directed the Petitioner to pay the fine amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- out of that the Accused shall pay the Rs. 1,00,000/- to the complainant and Rs. 10,000/- to the state towards prosecution expenses. And the same order was confirmed by the Lower Appellate Court.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5424

3. It is submitted that the during the pendency of the above Criminal Revision Petition, the Petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs. 55,000/- before the III-JMFC Court, Hubballi on 22-03-2025. Petitioner is further ready to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 55,000/- ( Rupees Fifty Five Thousand only) before the III-JMFC Court, A Hubballi within 4 weeks from today.

Therefore it is respectfully prayed to set aside the judgment and order passed by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.54/2020 dated 08.07.2022 and the judgment and order passed JMFC-III, Hubballi in C.C. No.939/2019 and consequently acquit the Petitioner for the offence punishable U/s 138 of the NI Act in the above case in the interest of justice and equity."

Placing the memos on record, both the revision

petitions stand disposed of.

It is made clear that the compensation amount as

agreed in the memos if not paid, the orders of the Trial

Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court stand

restored automatically.

In view of the memos, show cause notices issued to

the surety stand withdrawn.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5424

After the payment of compensation amount is paid, a

sum of Rs.10,000/- in both the petitions ordered by the

Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court

towards defraying expenses of the State stands set aside

as the lis is privy to the parties and no State machinery is

involved.

The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be

withdrawn by the complainant under due identification.

SD/-

(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

NAA CT:PA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter