Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Yojaka India Pvt Ltd vs Department Of Tourism
2025 Latest Caselaw 4606 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4606 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

M/S Yojaka India Pvt Ltd vs Department Of Tourism on 3 March, 2025

                                           -1-
                                                     NC: 2025:KHC:9015-DB
                                                     WA No. 1894 of 2024




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                       PRESENT
                      THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                          AND
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
                        WRIT APPEAL NO. 1894 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

               BETWEEN:
               1.   M/S. YOJAKA (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,
                    REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR
                    JAGADISH BOLOOR,
                    NO.3-28/43, ABCO TRADE CENTRE,
                    2ND FLOOR, N.H17,
                    KOTTARA CHOWKI,
                    MANGALORE - 575 006
                                                               ...APPELLANT
               (BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
                   SRI. B. YOGEENDRA ACHAR, ADVOCATE)
               AND:

               1.   DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM
Digitally
signed by           REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
CHAITHRA            KHANIJA BHAVANA
Location:
High Court          BENGALURU - 560 001
of Karnataka
               2.   DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM
                    REGIONAL TOURIST OFFICE
                    MANAGALORE - 575 003
                    REP. BY ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

               3.   DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND
                    PRESIDENT/ CHAIRMAN DISTRICT TOURISM
                    DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE,
                    DAKSHINA KANNADA,
                    MANGALORE - 575 001
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC:9015-DB
                                             WA No. 1894 of 2024




4.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     REPRESENTED BY
     ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
     VIDHANA SOUDHA
     BENGALURU - 560 001
                                                  ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

      THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH
COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P. No.6633/2019 (GM-RES) DATED
12.12.2024, SUSPEND THE COST IMPOSED AND ALLOW THE WRIT
PETITION BY ALLOWING THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
       N. V. ANJARIA
       and
       HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

The prayer before learned Single Judge of the appellant-

original petitioner was to consider the petitioner's letter dated

08.11.2013, whereby the request of the petitioner was to extend

the lease/contract period for a further period of fifty years. It was

next prayed to set aside the tender notification dated 25.01.2019

which was published in the Daily Newspaper on 27.01.2019.

NC: 2025:KHC:9015-DB

2. Learned Single Judge noticing the relevant aspect that the

lease of the petitioner itself had expired since the same was for the

period of five years, stated that the question of seeking extension

of lease for fifty years did not arise. While the petitioner relied on

the letter of the Assistant Director, Government of Karnataka,

Tourism Department, Mangaluru Taluka, Dakshina Kannada

District, dated 08.11.2013 which recommended for extension,

learned Single Judge has directed the Principal Secretary to initiate

the inquiry and submit a report as to how the such recommendation

could be made when the lease period had expired.

3. While dismissing the petition with cost of Rs.1 lakh, the

respondent-authorities were directed to issue fresh tender

notification at the earliest and proceed thereafter in accordance

with law. The respondents were also put at liberty to claim such

losses by initiating appropriate proceedings.

4. On consideration of facts and the submissions made by

learned Senior Advocate Mr. Kiran S. Javali for learned advocate

Mr. B. Yogeendra Achar for the appellant and learned Additional

Government Advocate Mr. K.S. Harish, the court does not find any

infirmity in the order of learned Single Judge, however, imposition

NC: 2025:KHC:9015-DB

of cost of Rs.1 lakh could be said to be harsh. Therefore, the cost

part is removed and the direction to pay the cost is set aside.

5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed subject to deletion of

costs.

At this stage, learned advocate for the appellant submitted

that in the fresh tender which may be issued by the respondent-

authorities, the petitioner-appellant may be permitted to be

participated.

It is observed that the appellant may participate in such

tender process which may be initiated afresh in accordance with

law, if eligible.

In view of dismissal of the appeal, the interlocutory

applications would not survive and they stand accordingly disposed

of.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter