Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Kannappan Soundarrajan vs M/S Ackuretta Systems (P) Ltd
2025 Latest Caselaw 1359 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1359 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Kannappan Soundarrajan vs M/S Ackuretta Systems (P) Ltd on 9 June, 2025

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                               -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC:19537
                                                      CRL.RP No. 1365 of 2021


                      HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                             BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                         CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1365 OF 2021
                      BETWEEN:

                         SRI KANNAPPAN SOUNDARRAJAN
                         S/O V C KANNAPPAN
                         AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
                         PROPRIETOR
                         M/S. REGISTRON
                         No.22/5, GANGADHAR CHETTY ROAD
                         BENGALURU - 560 042.
                                                                ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SMT. SUNANDA SARKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA        SRI VIVEK N, ADVOCATE)
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF              AND:
KARNATAKA

                         M/S ACKURETTA SYSTEMS (P) LTD.,
                         FORMERLY M/S. PARAMOUNT COMMERCE PVT. LTD.,
                         REGD. OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR
                         SHERIFF HOUSE
                         No.85, RICHMOND ROAD
                         BENGALURU - 560 025.
                                                           ...RESPONDENT

                      (BY SRI M ARUN POONAPPA, ADVOCATE)

                           THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH
                      SECTION    401   Cr.P.C.  PRAYING  TO   EXAMINE   THE
                      CORRECTNESS AND THE LEGAL VALIDITY OF THE SAID
                      JUDGMENT AND ORDER AND APPRECIATE THE FACTS AND
                      GROUNDS MENTIONED IN THE ABOVE CRIMINAL REVISION
                      PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED
                      07.08.2019 PASSED IN C.C.No.51850/2018 ON THE FILE OF
                                     -2-
                                                      NC: 2025:KHC:19537
                                              CRL.RP No. 1365 of 2021


HC-KAR




LVIII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND THE JUDGMENT DATED
11.10.2021 PASSED IN CRL.A.No.25219/2019 BEFORE THE
LXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO
HALL, BENGALURU AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL, CONSEQUENTLY,
ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT AND ETC.,

     THIS  PETITION COMING  ON  FOR  REPORTING
SETTLEMENT THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM:     HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                             ORAL ORDER

1. Petitioner is present. Learned counsel for

petitioner is present. Learned counsel for respondent is

present.

2. Memo for settlement is filed and it reads thus:

"MEMO FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT

The petitioner and respondent submits as follows:

1. The petitioner has preferred this petition challenging the Judgment and order dated 07/08/2019 in C.C.No.51850/2018 passed by the 58th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru and the Judgment dated 11/10/2021 in Crl.A.No.25219/2019 passed by the

NC: 2025:KHC:19537

HC-KAR

LXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Mayo Hall, Bengaluru.

2. At the intervention of well wishers and friends the petitioner and the respondent have amicably settled the matter and have decided to close the above matter as settled in the below manner.

3. The petitioner has agreed to pay the respondent a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) as final settlement in five monthly installments Rs.30,000/- per month. First installment starting in the month of June 2025 and the final installment on October 2025.

4. Accordingly the first installment payable for the month of June 2025 is paid to the respondent through online transfer (NEFT) on 06/06/2025 vide UTR No.SIBLN25157491105.

5. The remaining four installments would be done by the petitioner in July, August, September and October 2025.

6. The petitioner agrees to abide by this settlement memo, and in the event of failure of repayment by the petitioner as stated above, the respondent is at a liberty to proceed in accordance with law for recovery of the same.

7. The Petitioner has no objection for the Respondent to withdraw the entire amount deposited before the trial Court, deposited on the basis of interim order.

NC: 2025:KHC:19537

HC-KAR

WHEREFORE, the petitioner and respondent most humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take this Memo for Settlement on record, and close the above matter in the terms of this Memo for Settlement, in the interest of justice."

3. Petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of

Rs.1,50,000/- in 5 monthly installments of Rs.30,000/-

each. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that

petitioner has paid installment for the month of June,

2025. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the

petitioner has paid the first installment for the month of

June, 2025.

4. As per the terms of settlement petitioner has to

pay installments of July, August, September and October,

2025 in a sum of Rs.30,000/- each. Petitioner has

deposited a sum of Rs.37,273/- on 12.09.2019 and a sum

of Rs.56,550/- on 23.12.2021. The petitioner - accused

has no objection for the respondent to withdraw the said

amount deposited before the trial Court.

NC: 2025:KHC:19537

HC-KAR

5. Another condition in the memorandum of

settlement is that if the petitioner fails to make payment

of installments, the respondent is at liberty to proceed

against the petitioner in accordance with law.

6. Considering the above aspects, as the matter is

settled between the parties, the revision petition is

disposed of in terms of the settlement and offence under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is

compounded. If the petitioner fails to pay the remaining

installments as agreed, the conviction rendered in C.C. No.

51850/2013 restores and the respondent - complainant is

at liberty to recover the fine amount in accordance with

law.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

LRS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter