Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 646 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
MFA No. 3941 of 2017
C/W MFA No. 2792 of 2017
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3941 OF 2017 (MV-I)
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2792 OF 2017 (MV-I)
IN MFA No. 3941/2017
BETWEEN:
D SHASHIKUMAR
S/O DODDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
R/O MANJUNATHA NILAYA
NEAR THIPPENAGATTAMMA TEMPLE
5TH CROSS, JOGGIMATTI ROAD,
CHITRADURGA-577501
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE)
Digitally AND:
signed by
NIRMALA
DEVI 1. MOHAMMED NASARULLA
Location: S/O MOHAMMED ISMAIL
HIGH COURT MAJOR,
OF
KARNATAKA R/O 952, NATIONAL SHAMIYANA
CHALLAKERE ROAD,
JAGALUR TOWN-577 528
DAVANAGERE
2. THE BRANCH MANAGER
THE NEW INDIAN ASSURANCE CO LTD.,
BRANCH OFFICE,
NEAR P.B.ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577 501
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. C R RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. K SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
MFA No. 3941 of 2017
C/W MFA No. 2792 of 2017
HC-KAR
R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.01.2017 PASSED IN MVC
NO.1253/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, IV MACT AT CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION AND ETC.
IN MFA NO. 2792/2017
BETWEEN:
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,
BRANCH OFFICE, CHITRADURGA TOWN,
THROUGH MOTOR THIRD PARTY CLAIMS,
HUB, M.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001,
BY DULY CONSTITUTED ATORNEY.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. C R RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. K SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR)
AND:
1. D. SHASHIKUMAR
S/O. DODDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
R/AT MANJUNATHA NILAYA,
NEAR THIPPENAGATTAMMA TEMPLE,
5TH CROSS, JOGGIMATTI ROAD,
CHITRADURGA-577 501.
2. MOHAMMED NASARULLA
S/O. MOHAMMED ISMAIL,
MAJOR,
R/OF #952, NATIONAL SHAMIYANA
CHALLAKERE ROAD,
JAGALUR TOWN,
DAVANAGERE-577 528.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE FOR R1
R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
MFA No. 3941 of 2017
C/W MFA No. 2792 of 2017
HC-KAR
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.01.2017 PASSED IN MVC
NO.1253/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, & IV MACT, CHITRADURGA, AWARDING
COMPENSATION OF RS.10,41,600/- WITH INTEREST @ 8% P.A.
FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALIZATION AND ETC.
THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
The above appeals are filed calling in question the
judgment and award dated 17.01.2017 passed in MVC
No.1253/2015 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and IV
MACT, Chitradurga1. Hence, both the appeals are taken up
together for consideration.
2. The Tribunal vide judgment and award dated
17.01.2017 has awarded a total compensation of `10,41,600/-
together with interest at 8% p.a., from the date of petition till
the date of payment. Being aggrieved, the claimant has
preferred MFA No.3941/2017 seeking for enhancement of
compensation and the insurer has preferred MFA No.2792/2017
seeking for reduction of the quantum of compensation.
Hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal'
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
HC-KAR
3. The findings of the Tribunal on negligence and
liability are not under challenge and have attained finality.
Hence, the only aspect that is required to be considered in the
present appeal is with regard to the quantum of the
compensation awarded.
4. Heard the submissions of learned counsel Sri
B.Pramod for the claimant and learned counsel
Sri C.R.Ravishankar for learned counsel Sri K.Suryanarayana
Rao, for the insurer.
5. It is forthcoming that the claimant is aged 20 years.
Hence, the appropriate multiplier to be applied is 18 as has
been rightly applied by the Tribunal.
6. The claimant was stated to be a cleaner and
agriculturist. The Tribunal has assessed the notional income at
`8,000/- p.m. No documents have been produced to
demonstrate the income. Hence, keeping in mind the date of
the accident, the income is re-assessed as `8,500/- p.m.
7. It is forthcoming from the wound certificate (Ex.P3)
and the disability certificate (Ex.P16) that the claimant has
sustained compound fracture of the right proximal tibia as also
the head of fibula as well as crush injury to the right foot. The
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
HC-KAR
claimant has sustained fracture of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th
metatarsal of the right foot. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th toes of the
right foot have been amputated. The claimant was treated as
an inpatient for a total period of 40 days. The doctor (PW.3)
has assessed the disability of the claimant at 52% to the right
lower limb and the Tribunal upon appreciation of the material
on record has re-assessed the disability as 20%, which is just
and proper.
8. In view of the aforementioned, the compensation is
re-assessed as follows:
8.1 Having regard to the nature of injuries sustained, it
is just and proper that the compensation towards pain and
suffering be re-assessed as `60,000/- as against `2,00,000/-
awarded by the Tribunal;
8.2 The actual medical bills, which are produced as
Ex.P20 series totally amount to a sum of `1,37,165/-. Hence,
it is just and proper that a total compensation of `1,40,000/-
be awarded towards medical expenses;
8.3 Having regard to the fact that the claimant has
taken treatment as an inpatient for a total period of 40 days at
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
HC-KAR
Chitradurga, it is just and proper to award a compensation of
`40,000/- towards food, nourishment and attendant charges;
8.4 The Tribunal has not awarded any compensation
towards loss of amenities. Having regard to the nature of
injuries sustained and the resultant disability, it is just and
proper that the compensation towards loss of amenities be
awarded in a sum of `50,000/-;
8.5 The period of treatment is taken as 4 months and
accordingly, loss of income during laid up period is re-assessed
as (`8,500/-x4) `34,000/-;
8.6 The compensation towards disability/loss of earning
capacity is re-assessed as (`8,500/-x12x18x20%) `3,67,200/-
as against `3,45,600/- awarded by the Tribunal;
8.7 The compensation towards loss of marriage
prospects is re-assessed as `50,000/- as against `2,00,000/-
awarded by the Tribunal;
8.8 The compensation towards loss of estate at
`96,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is set aside, as also the
compensation towards medical and incidental expenses
awarded at `2,00,000/- as the same has already been
awarded.
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
HC-KAR
9. It is noticed that the Tribunal has awarded interest
at 8% p.a. However, taking judicial notice of the interest
payable towards fixed deposits, it is just and proper to award
interest at the rate of 7% p.a., on the compensation as re-
assessed by this Court.
10. Accordingly, the total compensation under various
heads is re-assessed as follows:
Sl. Heads Amount Amount
No. awarded by awarded by
the Tribunal this Court (`)
(`)
1. Towards pain and suffering 200000.00 60000.00
2. Towards medical & incidental 200000.00 140000.00
expenses/medical expenses
3. Loss of marriage prospects 200000.00 50000.00
4. Loss of amenities 0.00 50000.00
5. Loss of income during laid up 0.00 34000.00
period
6. Loss of estate 96000.00 0.00
7. Food, nourishment and 0.00 40000.00
attendant charges
8. Permanent disability 345600.00 367200.00
Total 1041600.00 741200.00
11. Hence, the claimant is entitled for a total
compensation of `7,41,200/-.
12. In the result, the following:
ORDER
i) The above appeals are allowed in part;
NC: 2025:KHC:23985
HC-KAR
ii) The judgment and award dated 17.01.2017 passed
in MVC No.1253/2015 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and IV MACT, Chitradurga, is modified to the extent stated herein. In all other respects, the judgment and award of the Tribunal remains unaltered.
iii) The claimant is entitled for a total compensation of Rs.7,41,200/- with interest at the rate of 7% p.a. from the date of petition till its realisation;
iv) The amount deposited by the appellant/insurer in MFA No.2792/2017 along with the records be transmitted to the Tribunal;
v) After deducting the amount deposited by the insurer, if the insurer is required to deposit any further amount towards the compensation awarded, together with accrued interest, the same shall be deposited within six weeks. In the event of any excess amount deposited by the insurer, the same shall be refunded to the insurer;
vi) The Registry to draw the modified award accordingly;
No costs.
Sd/-
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
ND
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!