Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2508 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
RP No. 100002 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
REVIEW PETITION NO.100002 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1. SRI ARUN KUMAR.T,
S/O. T. SURESHA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT. 17TH WARD, 6TH CROSS,
HANUMAN NAGARA, BELLARY - 583 101.
2. SRI T. GANGADHARA,
S/O. T. SURESHA,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/AT. 17TH WARD, 6TH CROSS,
HANUMAN NAGARA, BELLARY - 583 101.
3. SMT. SUMA
D/O. K.N. JAMBUNATH,
W/O. BANDA POMPAPATHI,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
Digitally
RESIDING AT 17-1-76,
KALLIMATAM STREET, WARD 17TH,
signed by
MANJANNA
MANJANNA E
E Date:
2025.01.20
14:21:41
+0530
RAYADURGA, ANANTHPUR,
ANDRA PRADESH - 515 865.
4. KUMARI MALATHI,
D/O. K.N. JAMBUNATH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DATTASAI NAGAR,
17TH WARD, BELLARY TOWN-583 101.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S. RAJSHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI AND
SRI S.S.YALIGAR, ADVOCATES)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
RP No. 100002 of 2025
AND:
1. SMT. ANUSUYAMMA, W/O. SRI M. SATHYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/O. NEELAKANATRAYA VIVRESE COLONY,
NEAR RAJARAJESHWARI TEMPLE,
HANUMAN NAGAR, ADONI,
KARNOOL DISTRICT - 518301,
ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. SRI B. SOMESWARA
S/O. LATE RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/O. NEELAKANATRAYA VIVRESE COLONY,
NEAR RAJARAJESHWARI TEMPLE,
HANUMAN NAGAR, ADONI,
KARNOOL DISTRICT - 518301,
ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. SRI B. NAGARAJU
S/O. LATE RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/O. NEELAKANATRAYA VIVRESE COLONY,
NEAR RAJARAJESHWARI TEMPLE,
HANUMAN NAGAR, ADONI,
KARNOOL DISTRICT - 518301,
ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. SRI B. MALLIKARJUNA
S/O. LATE RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/O. NEELAKANATRAYA VIVRESE COLONY,
NEAR RAJARAJESHWARI TEMPLE,
HANUMAN NAGAR, ADONI,
KARNOOL DISTRICT - 518301,
ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. SRI LAKSHMANNA
S/O. SRI BUDDAPPA
MAJOR, R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
6. SMT. ADEMMA
W/O. SRI SHESHAPPA,
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
RP No. 100002 of 2025
MAJOR,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
7. SRI MALLANNA
S/O. SRI BUDDAPPA,
MAJOR,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
8. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. SRI VEERABHADRAPPA,
MAJOR, R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
9. SMT. GANGAMMA
W/O. LATE VISHWANATHSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
10. SRI NARAYANA
S/O. LATE VISHWANATHSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD,
BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
11. SRI NEELAKANTAPPA
S/O. LATE SOMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/O. SHEKAR COLONY, 2ND CROSS,
AVANI APARTMENT (PLOT NO.6),
4TH FLOOR, S.N. PET, BALLARI.
12. SMT. PUSHPA
D/O. KODIGANTI NEELAKANTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/O. SHEKAR COLONY, 2ND CROSS,
AVANI APARTMENT (PLOT NO.6),
4TH FLOOR, S.N. PET, BALLARI.
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
RP No. 100002 of 2025
13. SMT. SOUMYA
D/O. KODIGANTI NEELAKANTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/O. SHEKAR COLONY, 2ND CROSS,
AVANI APARTMENT (PLOT NO.6),
4TH FLOOR, S.N. PET, BALLARI.
14. SRI SHIVA
S/O. LATE VISHWANATHSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
15. SRI B. NARAYANA
S/O. VENKATANARSAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
16. SRI SRIDHAR
S/O. SRI BADESAB,
MAJOR, R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
17. SMT. GANGAMMA
W/O. LATE SRI VISHWANATHSWAMY,
MAJOR, R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
18. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
W/O. LATE ANANDASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
19. SRI RAHAVENDRA
S/O. LATE ANANDASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
RP No. 100002 of 2025
20. SMT. PADMAVATHI
D/O. LATE ANANDASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
21. SMT. JOYTHI
D/O. LATE ANANDASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
22. SRI GURUSWAMY
S/O. LATE MACHANI NARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
R/O Y. NAGESHSHASTRY COMPOUND,
MAHANDIKOTTAM, 16TH WARD,
TALURU ROAD, BALLARI TOWN-583 101.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ
WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS
PRESENT REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND
FINAL ORDER DATED 24.12.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT
IN W.P.NO.107817/2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-A. ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.12.2024
PASSED ON IA NO.III BY HONBLE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BELLARY IN RA NO.12/2018 ON ORDER I RULE
10(2) APPLICATION AT ANNEXURE-B. TO ALLOW THE IMPLEADING
APPLICATION FILED BY WRIT PETITIONERS/APPLICANTS IN RA
NO.12/2018 PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE II ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BELLARY BY ALLOWING THE
PRESENT REVIEW PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
RP No. 100002 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI)
This review petition is filed for review of order dated
24.12.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.no.107817/2024.
2. Sri S.Rajashekhar, learned counsel for petitioners
appearing through video conference submitted that writ petition
was filed challenging order passed on I.A.no.III for impleading
filed in R.A.No.12/2018. It was submitted application was filed
for impleading on ground that petitioners though interested in
suit properties and had filed suit for partition were left out on
array of parties in appeal and would be affected by any
judgment and decree passed therein. It was submitted,
rejection of impleading application would be contrary to various
reported decisions. On said ground seeks for review.
3. Heard learned counsel and perused order
impugned.
4. Though review is sought on ground that rejection of
impleading application by Appellate Court was contrary to law,
it is seen, while disposing of writ petition, this Court had taken
note of fact that application was filed after matter was heard
and reserved for judgment and that petitioners had filed and
were prosecuting independent suit for partition. Dismissal of
NC: 2025:KHC-D:717
writ petition was with observation that rejection of application
would not prejudice to petitioners in prosecuting their suit
independently. Since application was filed after matter was
heard and reserved for judgment by First Appellate Court, only
clarification that would perhaps be required, would be that
rejection of application would not curtail remedies of petitioners
of questioning judgment and decree passed in appeal or
pursuing his suit independently. Same would not however, be a
ground to entertain review petition.
5. With above observation, review petition is
dismissed.
In view of nature of disposal, compliance of office
objection would not be necessary.
SD/-
(RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE
EM CT:PA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!