Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammed Abdul Khadeer vs The State And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 2188 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2188 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Mohammed Abdul Khadeer vs The State And Anr on 10 January, 2025

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                             -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC-K:119
                                                    CRL.P No. 200989 of 2024




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                           CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200989 OF 2024
                                   (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))
                   BETWEEN:

                   MOHAMMED ABDUL KHADEER
                   S/O MD. IBRAHIM,
                   AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                   R/O. SIDDI TALEEM BIDAR,
                   TQ. AND DIST. BIDAR-585401.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI LIYAQAT FAREED USTAD, ADVOCATE)
                   AND:

                   1.   THE STATE THROUGH
                        BIDAR WOMEN POLICE STATION,
Digitally signed        BIDAR SUB DIVISION,
by SHILPA R             REP. THROUGH
TENIHALLI
                        ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                HIGH COURT OF KALABURAGI BENCH-585107.
KARNATAKA
                   2.   LALITA @ AYESHA SIDDIQA,
                        W/O MOHAMMED ABDUL KHADEER,
                        AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
                        R/O. SIDDI TALEEM BIDAR,
                        TQ. AND DIST. BIDAR-585401.
                        NOW ANNADUR VILLAGE,
                        TQ. AND DIST. BIDAR-585401.
                                                             ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. MAYA T.R., HCGP FOR R1
                    SRI SHARANAGOUDA V . PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
                             -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC-K:119
                                   CRL.P No. 200989 of 2024




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
QUASH     THE    ENTIRE    FURTHER   PROCEEDINGS     IN
C.C.NO.6375/2023, IN CRIME NO. 9/2022 OF BIDAR WOMEN
POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 498A,
323, 504, 506, OF IPC AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF COURT
OF 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BIDAR.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                      ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

1. Accused in C.C.No.6375/2023 pending before the

court of I Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Bidar arising out of

Crime No.09/2022 registered by the Women Police

Station, Bidar for offences punishable under sections

498A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC is before this court under

section 482 of Cr.P.C with the prayer to quash the entire

proceedings in the said case.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1.

Respondent No.2 who is served in the matter has

remained unrepresented before this court.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:119

3. FIR in Crime No.09/2022 was registered by Bidar

Women Police Station, Bidar against the petitioner herein

for the aforesaid offences on the basis of the first

information dated 14.02.2022 received from respondent

No.2 who is the wife of the accused. After investigation,

police have filed charge sheet against the petitioner for the

aforesaid offences and the Trial Court thereafter has taken

cognizance of the charge sheeted offences and issued

summons to the petitioner. Who is now before the Trial

Court in C.C.No.6375/2023.

4. Aggrieved by the criminal proceedings initiated

against him, the petitioner is before this court.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the

petitioner and the respondent No.2 have separated long

back and she had earlier filed a similar criminal case

against the petitioner and he was tried in

C.C.No.1412/2012 by the jurisdictional Magistrate on

similar allegations and was acquitted by judgment and

order dated 17.01.2013. Thereafter, the petitioner and

NC: 2025:KHC-K:119

the respondent No.2 are staying separately. For

extraneous reasons she has now filed a false complaint

which is highly belated and accordingly prays to allow the

petition.

6. Per contra, the learned High Court Government

Pleader has opposed the petition.

7. Perusal of the material available on record would go

to show that marriage of the petitioner with the

respondent No.2 was solemnized on 23.07.1999 and from

the wedlock they have five children. It appears that the

relationship between the petitioner and his wife got

strained subsequently and in the year 2012, the

respondent No.2 had filed a criminal case against the

petitioner and in the said case he was charged sheeted for

offences punishable under section 498A, 504, 323 of IPC.

After charge sheet case against petitioner was registered

in C.C.No.1412/2012. Petitioner was acquitted in

C.C.No.1412/2012 by the jurisdictional court of Magistrate

by judgment and order of acquittal dated 17.01.2013 and

NC: 2025:KHC-K:119

undisputedly the said judgment and order of acquittal has

attained finality.

8. Perusal of the first information in the present case

would reveal that respondent No.2 was staying separately

from the petitioner along with their children and it appears

that on the pretext of taking the children to a picnic, the

petitioner had taken them along with him and thereafter

the children are residing with him. Allegation in the first

information is that on 06.10.2021, petitioner came to the

place where respondent No.2 was residing and after

abusing her, he had assaulted her.

9. In respect of the alleged incident that had taken

place on 06.10.2021, belatedly, a complaint is filed on

14.02.2022 which is after a delay of more than 4 months.

No proper explanation whatsoever has been given by the

respondent No.2 for the inordinate delay in approaching

the police. In addition to the same, material record would

go to show that in the earlier criminal case registered

against the petitioner with very same allegations, he was

NC: 2025:KHC-K:119

acquitted and thereafter the petitioner and the respondent

No.2 were residing separately.

10. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that

the impugned criminal case is liable to be quashed.

Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i) Criminal Petition is allowed.

ii) The entire proceedings in C.C.No.6375/2023 pending before the court of I Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Bidar arising out of Crime No.09/2022 registered by the Women Police Station, Bidar for offences punishable under sections 498A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC, is hereby quashed as against the petitioner.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

DHA

CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter