Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siddharth Navin Salian vs Rekha Biswas
2025 Latest Caselaw 2007 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2007 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Siddharth Navin Salian vs Rekha Biswas on 7 January, 2025

                                                -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC:181-DB
                                                        COMAP No. 581 of 2024




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                           DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
                                             PRESENT
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
                                               AND
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
                             COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2024
                   BETWEEN:

                         SIDDHARTH NAVIN SALIAN,
                         S/O CHENNAPPA SALIAN,
                         AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
                         R/AT AMBER KUTIR,
                         5TH FLOOR, 166 SHIVAJI PARK,
                         DR. M.B. RAUT ROAD,
                         MUMBAI - 400 028.

                         AND WORKING FOR GAIN AT:
                         2M ATELIERS AND DESIGN PVT. LTD.,
                         62, FLOOR 3, EVERGREEN INDUSTRIAL
                         ESTATE, DR. E. MOSES ROAD,
                         SHAKTI MILL LANE, JACO B CIRCLE,
                         MUMBAI CITY, MUMBAI,
Digitally signed
by                       MAHARASHTRA, INDIA - 400 051.
SREEDHARAN
BANGALORE
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI                                                           ...APPELLANT
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
                   (BY SMT. RUPA RON, ADVOCATE FOR
KARNATAKA              SRI. KIRAN V RON, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    REKHA BISWAS
                         D/O RAJKUMAR KHATRI,
                         AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
                         C 601, SHRIRAM LUXOR,
                         HENNUR BAGLUR MAIN ROAD,
                         BENGALURU - 560 077.
                           -2-
                                     NC: 2025:KHC:181-DB
                                  COMAP No. 581 of 2024




2.   MAXIMILLANO MODESTI
     S/O DELFINO MODESTI,
     AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
     HAVING OFFICE AT 2M ATELIERS,
     AND DESIGN PVT LTD.,
     62, FLOOR 3, EVERGREEN INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
     DR. E. MOSES ROAD,
     SHAKTHI MILL LANE,
     JACO, B CIRCLE, MUMBAI CITY,
     MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA,
     INDIA - 400 051.

3.   STUDIO SILAI LLP
     REGISTERED UNDER THE LIMITED
     LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT 2008
     HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT
     SY. NO.33,
     MANASVI EDIFICE, KOTHANUR MAIN ROAD,
     BEHIND AMMAS PASTERIES,
     KOTHANUR, BENGALURU,
     BENGALURU NORTH, KARNATAKA
     INDIA - 560 077.
     REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ALL ITS
     DESIGNATED PARTNERS.

                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)


     THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SEC.13(1) OF THE
COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDERS DATED 18.12.2024, 13.12.2024, 12.12.2024 AND
28.11.2024 PASSED IN COMMERCIAL A.A. NO. 279/2024 ON
THE FILE OF LXXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)      (CCH 88), BENGALURU AT
ANNEXURES A, D, E AND F RESPECTIVELY, IN SO FAR AS THEY
EXTEND THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20.08.2024 AND ETC.


    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                  -3-
                                               NC: 2025:KHC:181-DB
                                          COMAP No. 581 of 2024




CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
            and
            HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

                    ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)

1. The present appeal has been filed with the following

prayers:

"a) Set aside the orders dated 18.12.2024, 13.12.2024, 12.12.2024 and 28.11.2024 passed in Commercial A.A. No.279/2024 on the file of LXXXVII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) (CCH-88), Bengaluru, at Annexures A, D, E and F respectively, in so far as they extend the Interim order dated 20.08.2024;

b) Allow the application I.A. No.6 dated 01.10.2024 filed by the Appellant in Com. A.A. No.279/2024 on the file of LXXXVII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) (CCH-88), Bengaluru under Order XXXIV Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which is produced at Annexure J;

c) Consequently set aside the ad-interim orders dated 20.08.2024 passed on I.A. Nos.2, 3 and 4 in Com.

A.A. No.279/2024 on the file of LXXXVII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) (CCH-88), Bengaluru, which is produced at Annexure-B; and

d) Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

NC: 2025:KHC:181-DB

2. Conceding the order passed in on an application filed

under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996 ('Act of 1996' in short), learned counsel for the

parties on instructions states that the parties be relegated

to the arbitration process by appointing an Arbitrator.

They agree that the Arbitrator be appointed by the

Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru from its

panel.

3. Noting the said submissions, the parties are relegated to

the arbitration process under the aegis of the Arbitration

and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru. The Director of the

Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru shall

appoint an Arbitrator, a retired Judge of the High Court

from its panel.

4. The appointment of the learned Arbitrator shall be

regulated by the rules framed by the Arbitration and

Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru.

5. Accordingly, the parties and their counsel are directed to

appear before the Director, Arbitration and Conciliation

Centre, Bengaluru on 10.01.2025.

NC: 2025:KHC:181-DB

6. It goes without saying that all the contentions of the

parties are left open to be agitated before the learned

Arbitrator for his consideration and decision. They are

also at liberty to file such application as deem appropriate

before the learned Arbitrator, for a decision thereof.

7. The appeal is disposed of.

8. Let the copy of the order be sent to the Director,

Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru through e-

mail.

9. Parties are also at liberty to submit a copy of this order to

the Director of the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre,

Bengaluru.

Pending I.A No.1/2024 do not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE

Sd/-

(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter