Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandrashekhar Patil And Ors vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 4122 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4122 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Chandrashekhar Patil And Ors vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr on 18 February, 2025

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                               -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120
                                                     CRL.A No. 200028 of 2025




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                      KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                            BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.200028 OF 2025 (U/S 14 (A))
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    CHANDRASHEKHAR PATIL S/O MALLINATH PATIL,
                         AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: BLOOD BANK OWNER
                         R/O. SONTH VILLAGE, NOW AT KHUBA PLOT,
                         KALABURAGI-585103.
                   2.    ADITYA @ ADESH S/O SHIVAJI RAO THUKALE,
                         AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: TECHNICIAN,
                         R/O. KAMALA NAGAR, TQ. AWARAD (B),
                         NOW AT KALABURAGI.
                   3.    OMPRAKASH S/O BALAJI RAO GORAWADI,
                         AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
                         R/O. LADA, TQ.BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR.
                   4.    RAHUL PATIL S/O RAJASHEKHAR PATIL,
Digitally signed         AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT (B.E.),
by SHIVAKUMAR            R/O. SONTH VILLAGE, NOW AT PRAGATI COLONY,
HIREMATH
                         KALABURAGI.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          5.    ASFAQ AHMED S/O HASSAN PATEL,
                         AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: LEARNING TECHNICIAN,
                         R/O. SANTRASWADI, KALABURAGI.

                   6.    VEERENDRA S/O AMARANATH PATIL,
                         AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                         R/O. SONTH VILLAGE, TQ.KAMALAPUR,
                         DIST. KALABURAGI.
                                                                ...APPELLANTS
                   (BY SRI RAJESH DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE)
                            -2-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120
                                 CRL.A No. 200028 of 2025




AND:

1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
     M B NAGAR POLICE STATION,
     KALABURAGI CITY,
     NOW REPRESENTED BY,
     THE ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
     HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
     KALABURAGI BENCH-585102.

2.   MALLIKARJUN S/O RANAPPA NATIKAR,
     AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: WARD BOY,
     BASAVESHWAR HOSPITAL,
     R/O H.NO.2-907/76/ PLOT NO.146,
     PRAGATI COLONY, KALABURAGI-585103.

                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. ANITA M. REDDY, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)

     THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/SEC. 14-A (2) OF SC/ST (PA)
ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2025
PASSED BY THE HON'BLE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS    JUDGE,    KALABURAGI    CRIMINAL     MISC.NO.
2138/2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS/
A-1 TO 6 (AS PER FIR) IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.
130/2024 OF M B NAGAR POLICE STATION REGISTERED FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S SECTION 189(2), 191(2),
191(3), 103, 115(2), 118(1), 127(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3)
READ WITH SECTION 190 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANTHITA
(BNS) 2023 AND SECTION 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST
(PA) ACT, 1989, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE II
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KALABURAGI
IN CRIME NO.130/2024.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                                    -3-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120
                                           CRL.A No. 200028 of 2025




                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

This appeal under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, is filed by accused

Nos.1 to 6 assailing the order dated 18.01.2025 passed by

the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Kalaburagi in Crl.Misc.No.2138/2024 and seeking to

enlarge them on regular bail in Crime No.130/2024

registered by M.B. Nagar Police Station, Kalaburagi City,

for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2),

191(3), 103, 115(2), 118(1), 127(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3)

read with Section 190 of BNS, 023 and Sections 3(1)(r),

3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants

and learned High Court Government Pleader for

respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 though served in the

matter, has remained unrepresented before this Court.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120

3. FIR in Crime No.130/2024 was registered by

M.B.Nagar Police Station, Kalaburagi, for the aforesaid

offences against the appellants herein on the basis first

information on 13.12.2024 received from respondent

No.2, who is the father of deceased Shashikant. During

the course of investigation of the case, accused No.1 and 4

were arrested on 16.12.2024, accused Nos.2, 3 and 5

were arrested on 13.12.2024 and accused No.6 was

arrested on 18.12.2024. Investigation of the case is

completed and charge sheet has been filed against six

accused persons. The bail application filed by the

appellants before the jurisdictional Sessions Court in

Crl.Misc.No.2138/2024 was rejected on 18.01.2025.

Therefore, they are before this Court.

4. Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that

the final opinion as to the cause of death of deceased

would go to show that death was not due to the alleged

assault made by appellants/accused persons. The

appellants do not have any other criminal antecedents.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120

The deceased had suffered contusion wounds on his body

and said injuries are simple in nature. Investigation of the

case is completed. Accordingly, he prays to allow the

appeal.

5. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent No.1, who has opposed the prayer

made in the appeal, however, does not dispute the

submission made by the learned counsel for the

appellants. The deceased had suffered ten injuries and

the first informant has stated that deceased and the

injured were assaulted by accused persons inside the

blood bank of accused No.1 and the deceased had

collapsed when he was being taken by his parents from

the place where he was assaulted and therefore, there is

nexus between the death of the deceased and assault

made by the accused persons. Accordingly, she prays to

dismiss the appeal.

6. Perusal of the material available on record

would go to show that Akash, who was the friend of

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120

Shashikant was an employee in the blood bank of accused

No.1 and at the request of Akash, deceased Shashikant

used to go to the blood bank to sleep during night hours.

On 12.12.2024, the first informant allegedly received a

phone call from his son and he asked him to come near

the blood bank. At about 5.20 p.m. the first informant

and his wife went near the blood bank and found his son

Shashikant and Akash being assaulted by the persons

named in the first information and on enquiry, he came to

know that on the allegation of committing theft of 40

packs of cigarettes, which were kept in the blood bank, the

accused persons were assaulting Shashikant and his friend

Akash with belt, sugarcane and wooden stick. Thereafter,

the first informant and his wife took Shashikant along with

them from the blood bank and on their way back to their

house, Shashikant collapsed on the road and immediately

thereafter he was shifted to a hospital, but he was

declared dead in the hospital and therefore, the first

informant had approached the police at about 00.30 hours

on 13.12.2024. The postmortem report of deceased

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120

Shashikant would go to show that he had suffered

contusion injuries over his body and in the final opinion,

the cause of death of Shashikant mentioned that death

was due to coronary artery disease associated with

multiple contusion injuries sustained. The wound

certificate of the injured Aakash would go to show that he

has suffered only simple injuries as a result of assault

made by the accused persons. Akash as well as deceased

Shashikant were together assaulted by the accused

persons inside the blood bank by using the very same

weapons. Undisputedly, the appellants do not have any

criminal antecedents. Investigation of the case is

completed and charge sheet has been filed.

7. Under the circumstances, I am of the view that

without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of

the case, the prayer made by the appellants for grant of

regular bail is required to be answered affirmatively.

Accordingly, following order is passed:

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120

ORDER

The appeal is allowed.

The impugned order passed by the Court of II

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in

Crl.Misc.No.2138/2024 dated 18.01.2025 is set aside.

The appellants/accused Nos.1 to 6 are directed to be

enlarged on bail in Crime No.130/2024 of M.B.Nagar Police

Station, Kalaburagi City, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 103,

115(2), 118(1), 127(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) read with

Section 190 of BNS, 2023 and under Sections 3(1)(r),

3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act, pending before

the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Kalaburagi, subject to the following conditions:

a) Appellants shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

b) Appellants shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1120

Court exempts their appearance for valid reasons;

c) Appellants shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

d) Appellants shall not involve in similar offences in future.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

TMP/SRT

CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter