Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Basavaraj vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 3412 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3412 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Basavaraj vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr on 1 February, 2025

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                              -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-K:722
                                                     CRL.A No. 200017 of 2025




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                      KALABURAGI BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                            BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200017 OF 2025 (U/S 14 (A))
                   BETWEEN:

                   BASAVARAJ S/O. SADDAPPA HADAPAD,
                   AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
                   R/O. GANI, TQ NIDAGUNDI,
                   DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586101.

                                                                  ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI SANJAY A. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH,
                         NIDAGUNDI POLICE STATION, NIDAGUNDI CIRCLE,
                         DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586101.
Digitally signed
by SHIVAKUMAR            REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP,
HIREMATH                 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
Location: HIGH           KALABURAGI BENCH-585103.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   2.    RACHAPPA S/O. KALLAPPA KUMBAR,
                         AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                         R/O. GANI, TQ NIDAGUNDI,
                         DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586101.


                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. MAYA T.R., HCGP FOR R1
                    R2 SERVED)
                             -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC-K:722
                                    CRL.A No. 200017 of 2025




     THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/SEC. 14-A (2) OF SC/ST (PA)
ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
17.12.2024 PASSED IN CRL MISC NO. 1765/2024 ON THE FILE
OF II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE
VIJAYAPURA BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND THEREBY
ENLARGE THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO. 3 ON BAIL IN CRIME
NO. 28/2024 REGISTERED BY NIDAGUNDI POLICE STATION,
DISTRICT VIJAYAPURA, CHARGE SHEETED FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE U/SECs 120-B, 302, 201, R/W 34 OF IPC AND
SEC 3(2)(V) OF SC/ST (PA) ACT 2015, PENDING ON THE FILE
OF II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE
VIJAYAPURA.


    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                     ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

1. Accused No.3 in Crime No.28/2024 registered by

Nidagundi Police Station, Vijayapura for offences

punishable under Section 120-B, 302, 201 r/w 34 of IPC

and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 2015, is before

this Court in this appeal filed under Section 14(A)(2) of

SC/ST POA Act, assailing the order dated 17.12.2024

passed by the II Addl. District & Sessions and Special

Judge, Vijayapura in Crl.Misc.No.1765/2024.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:722

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1.

3. Respondent No.2 - de facto complainant who is

served in the matter has remained unrepresented by

before this Court.

4. FIR in Crime No.28/2024 was registered by

Nidagundi Police Station, Vijayapura, initially for offence

punishable under Section 302 of IPC against unknown

person on the basis of first information received from

Rachappa who is the brother of deceased Somaningappa.

5. During the course of investigation of the case,

appellant herein was arrested on 23.03.2024 and

subsequently remanded to judicial custody. Investigation

of the case is completed and charge sheet has been filed

against 3 persons for the aforesaid offences and the

appellant herein is arrayed as accused No.3 in the charge

sheet. Bail application filed by the appellant before the

jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.1765/2024 was

NC: 2025:KHC-K:722

rejected on 17.12.2024. Assailing the said order, he is

before this Court.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

appellant who is the youngster having no criminal

antecedent is in custody for last more than 10 months.

Entire case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial

evidence. Accordingly, he prays to allow the appeal.

7. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader

has opposed the prayer made in the appeal. There are

sufficient material to connect the accused to the crime and

accused were seen together immediately prior to they

committing the murder. Accused No.1 had a strong

motive to commit the murder. Accordingly, she prays to

dismiss the appeal.

8. FIR in the present case was initially registered for the

offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC against

unknown persons on the basis of first information received

from Rachappa who is the brother of deceased

NC: 2025:KHC-K:722

Somaningappa. During the course of investigation,

accused Nos.1 to 3 were arrested. Investigation of the

case is completed and the charge sheet has been filed.

9. As per the charge sheet allegations, deceased

Somaningappa had illicit relationship with

Smt.Parvathavva who is the mother of accused No.1.

Because of the said illicit relationship between Parvathavva

and Somaningappa, the marriage proposal of the younger

sister of accused No.1 had failed and accused No.1 was

finding it difficult to get proposals for the marriage of his

younger sister. It is in this background, accused No.1

allegedly conspired with accused Nos.2 & 3 who are his

friends to commit the murder of his mother Parvathavva

and her paramour Somaningappa. In furtherance of such

conspiracy, on 18.03.2024, accused No.1 allegedly picked

up his mother Parvathavva and Somaningappa in his

motor bike and when they reached the spot of crime, he

allegedly made deceased fall on the ground and accused

Nos.2 & 3 who were waiting near the spot of crime

NC: 2025:KHC-K:722

assaulted Parvathavva and Somaningappa with deadly

weapons and thereafter even accused No.1 had joined

accused Nos.2 & 3 and all the accused together assaulted

Parvathavva and Somaningappa with deadly weapons and

committed their murder.

10. The entire case of the prosecution is based on

circumstantial evidence. Undisputedly, appellant had no

other criminal antecedent and he is in custody for the last

10 months. Trial in the case is yet to commence.

Investigation of the case is completed and charge sheet is

already filed. Accused Nos.1 & 2 are said to be in custody.

11. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that,

the learned Sessions Judge was not justified in rejecting

the bail application of the appellant. Accordingly, the

following order:

ORDER

The criminal appeal is allowed.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:722

The order dated 17.12.2024 passed by the II Addl.

District & Sessions and Special Judge, Vijayapura in

Crl.Misc.No.1765/2024, is set aside.

The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in

Crime No.28/2024 registered by Nidagundi Police Station,

Vijayapura for offences punishable under Section 120-B,

302, 201 r/w 34 of IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST

(POA) Act, 2015 pending before the court of II Addl.

District & Sessions and Special Judge, Vijayapura in

Crl.Misc.No.1765/2024, subject to the following

conditions:

a) The appellant shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

b) The appellant shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

NC: 2025:KHC-K:722

c) The appellant shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

d) The appellant shall not involve in similar offences in future;

e) The appellant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the case registered against him is disposed off.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

DHA

CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter