Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahesh Enterprises vs Sri.Mrutyunjaya Traders
2025 Latest Caselaw 3394 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3394 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Mahesh Enterprises vs Sri.Mrutyunjaya Traders on 1 February, 2025

Author: Ravi V.Hosmani
Bench: Ravi V.Hosmani
                                                -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
                                                      CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                         DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                              BEFORE

                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI

                         CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100074 OF 2019
                                    (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)]

                       BETWEEN:

                       MAHESH ENTERPRISES
                       ITS PROP: MAHESHAPPA MURIGEPPA UPPIN,
                       AGE: YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                       R/O: BANDAR ROAD, MANGALURU,
                       STATE: KARNATAKA.
                                                                  ... PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       SRI MRUTYUNJAYA TRADERS
                       REPRESENTED BY PROP: MAHADEVAPPA
                       S/O. UJJAPPA MALLAPPANAVAR,
          Digitally
          signed by
                       AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                       R/O: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI,
          MANJANNA E
MANJANNA
E        Date:
         2025.02.01
          15:46:11
          +0530
                       STATE: KARNATAKA.
                                                                 ... RESPONDENT
                       (BY SRI S.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE (VAKALATH FILED))

                            THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
                       R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
                       AND ORDER DATED 19.12.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II-
                       ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI, SITTING AT
                       RANEBENNUR IN CRL.A.NO.91/2015, CONFIRMING THE
                       JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 07.09.2015
                       PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI, IN
                       C.C.NO.188/2009 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.138 OF NI ACT.
                                        -2-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
                                               CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019




    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

                                  ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI)

Challenging judgment/order dated 07.09.2015 passed by

Civil Judge and JMFC., Byadgi in C.C.no.188/2009 and

judgment/order dated 19.12.2018 passed by II Addl. District

and Sessions Judge, Haveri, sitting at Ranebennur in Crl.Appeal

no.91/2015, this revision petition is filed.

2. Sri Naveen Chatrad, learned counsel for petitioner

and Sri S. B. Patil, learned counsel for respondent jointly

submitted that matter is settled between parties and a

compromise petition is filed under Section 147 of Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881, wherein, it is stated as under:

"1. It is submitted that Petitioner has filed the above Criminal Revision Petition against the judgment and order dated 19-12-2018 passed by the Ld. II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Haveri, Sitting at Ranebennur in Criminal Appeal No.91/2015, confirming the judgment and order of conviction dated 07-09-2015 passed by the Ld. Civil Judge and JMFC Byadgi, in C.C.No.188/2009 for the offence punishable under section 138 of NI

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043

Act, whereby The trial court after appreciation of the evidence on record Acting U/s 255 (2) of Cr.P.C.the accused is convicted for the offence punishable U/s 138 of N.I.Act. The accused is sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 1 year and also pay fine of Rs.4,000/- In default, the accused shall undergo S.I. for a period of 3 months. Acting U/s 357 (3) of Cr.P.C. the accused is directed to pay compensation amount of Rs.65,000/- to the complainant. The fine amount of Rs.4,000/- shall be deposited to the state. It is submitted that Accused/petitioner has taken to the custody and now he is in judicial custody. Therefore the son of the accused is entering into compromise and signing this petition and filing the affidavit. However the Accused will file separate affidavit in support of the compromise immediately after release from the custody.

2. It is submitted that during the pendency of the above petition due to intervention of elders and mediation of the well wishers both the Petitioner and Respondent have amicably settled the above case on the following terms and conditions:

i) that the Respondent / Complainant has agreed to receive Rs. 65,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand only)as full and final settlement amount. Out of the same he has already received Rs. 15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) by cash and today

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043

he is receiving balance agreed of Rs.

50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only)by way of cash from the Petitioner/Accused before this Hon'ble Court.

ii) that the Respondent/ Complainant has no objection to set aside the order of convictions passed by the courts below."

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since

petitioner i.e., Maheshappa Murigeppa Uppin is in custody, his

son Shailesh S/o. Mahesh Uppin is before this Court and has

not only signed on compromise petition but also undertakes to

comply with terms of compromise.

4. Sri Mahadevappa S/o. Ujjappa Mallappanavar i.e.,

complainant is present and identified by his counsel. He

knowledges receipt of entire amount as mentioned in

compromise petition.

5. Compromise petition is taken on record.

6. In view of above compromise, revision petition

requires to be allowed. Hence, following:

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043

ORDER

i) Criminal Revision Petition is allowed.

ii) Impugned judgment/order dated 07.09.2015 passed by Civil Judge and JMFC., Byadgi in C.C.no.188/2009 and judgment/order dated 19.12.2018 passed by II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Haveri, sitting at Ranebennur in Crl.Appeal no.91/2015 are set aside.

iii) Revision petitioner is ordered to be released from custody, forthwith.

iv) Intimate to concerned Jail Authority immediately.

SD/-

(RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE

RH CT:PA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter