Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5795 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:32236
RFA No. 628 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.628 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MR. NAGAVARMA PRABHU .A
S/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNA ANANTHAN
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
EARLIER AT NO.227, 1ST FLOOR,
HRBR LAYOUT 1ST BLOCK,
KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU-560043.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT:
FLAT NO.207, ARJUN AURA APARTMENT,
97/4, 5TH CROSS, BILEKAHALLI,
OFF: BANNERGHATTA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560076.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI R M ANNAMALAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: HIGH MRS. SRILAKSHMI .N
COURT OF W/O MR. NAGAVARMA PRABHU .A
KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
D/O MR. NARAYANASWAMY N.K.
HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENT AT
NO.159, 3RD CROSS, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR,
4TH BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT.
BENGALURU-560096.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
FLAT NO.R-702, ROHAN JAROKA II,
KEMPAPURA MAIN ROAD,
YAMALURU, BELLANDUR,
BENGALURU-560037.
...RESPONDENT
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:32236
RFA No. 628 of 2025
HC-KAR
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.02.2025 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.291/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL
JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
The present Regular First Appeal is preferred by the
plaintiff assailing the legality and correctness of the
judgment and decree dated 03.02.2025 passed in OS No.
291/2019 on the file of the I Additional Principal Judge,
Family Court, Bengaluru.
2. The suit for declaration and permanent
injunction is filed before the Family Court, Bengaluru and
by the impugned judgment and decree the suit came to be
dismissed. Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984
(for short 'the Act') clearly envisages that, an appeal
would lie from every judgment or order, not being an
interlocutory order, of a Family Court to the High Court
both on facts and on law. The present Regular First
NC: 2025:KHC:32236
HC-KAR
Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is
not maintainable in light of Section 19(1) of the Act.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not
maintainable. Appellant is at liberty to file an appeal
before the appropriate Court in accordance with law.
Liberty is reserved to the appellant to seek exclusion of
time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in
accordance with law.
Sd/-
____________________
JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CKL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!